search
HomeTechnology peripheralsAINew research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

Scaling of Transformer models has aroused the research interest of many scholars in recent years. However, not much is known about the scaling properties of different inductive biases imposed by model architectures. It is often assumed that improvements at a specific scale (computation, size, etc.) can be transferred to different scales and computational regions.

However, it is crucial to understand the interaction between architecture and scaling laws, and it is of great research significance to design models that perform well at different scales. Several questions remain to be clarified: Do model architectures scale differently? If so, how does inductive bias affect scaling performance? How does it affect upstream (pre-training) and downstream (transfer) tasks?

In a recent paper, researchers at Google sought to understand the impact of inductive bias (architecture) on language model scaling . To do this, the researchers pretrained and fine-tuned ten different model architectures across multiple computational regions and scales (from 15 million to 40 billion parameters). Overall, they pretrained and fine-tuned more than 100 models of different architectures and sizes and presented insights and challenges in scaling these ten different architectures.

New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

##Paper link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.10551.pdf

They also note that scaling these models is not as simple as it seems, that is, the complex details of scaling are intertwined with the architectural choices studied in detail in this article. For example, a feature of Universal Transformers (and ALBERT) is parameter sharing. This architectural choice significantly warps the scaling behavior compared to the standard Transformer not only in terms of performance, but also in terms of computational metrics such as FLOPs, speed, and number of parameters. In contrast, models like Switch Transformers are quite different, with an unusual relationship between FLOPs and parameter quantities.

Specifically, the main contributions of this article are as follows:

  • The first derivation of different inductive biases and the scaling law of the model architecture. The researchers found that this scaling factor varied significantly across models and noted that this is an important consideration in model development. It turns out that of all ten architectures they considered, the vanilla Transformer had the best scaling performance, even if it wasn't the best in absolute terms per compute area. Researchers have observed that
  • A model that works well in one computational scaling region is not necessarily the best model in another computational scaling region. Additionally, they found that some models, while performing well in low-computation regions, were difficult to scale. This means that it is difficult to get a complete picture of the model's scalability by comparing point by point in a certain computational area. Researchers found that
  • when it comes to scaling different model architectures, upstream pre-training perplexity may be less relevant to downstream transfer. Therefore, the underlying architecture and inductive bias are also critical for downstream migration. The researchers highlighted the difficulty of scaling under certain architectures and showed that some models did not scale (or scaled with a negative trend). They also found a tendency for linear temporal attention models (such as Performer) to be difficult to scale.
  • Methods and Experiments

In the third chapter of the paper, the researcher outlines the overall experimental setup and introduces the model evaluated in the experiment.

Table 1 below shows the main results of this article, including the number of trainable parameters, FLOPs (single forward pass) and speed (steps per second). In addition, it also includes Validate perplexity (upstream pre-training) and results on 17 downstream tasks.

Are all models scaled the same way?

Figure 2 below shows the scaling behavior of all models when increasing the number of FLOPs. It can be observed that the scaling behavior of all models is quite unique and different, i.e. most of them are different from the standard Transformer. Perhaps the biggest finding here is that most models (e.g., LConv, Evolution) appear to perform on par or better than the standard Transformer, but fail to scale with higher compute budgets.

Another interesting trend is that "linear" Transformers, such as Performer, do not scale. As shown in Figure 2i, compared from base to large scale, the pre-training perplexity only dropped by 2.7%. For the vanilla Transformer this figure is 8.4%.

New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

Figure 3 below shows the scaling curves of all models on the downstream migration task. It can be found that compared with Transformer, most models have different The scaling curve,changes significantly in downstream tasks. It is worth noting that most models have different upstream or downstream scaling curves.

The researchers found that some models, such as Funnel Transformer and LConv, seemed to perform quite well upstream, but were greatly affected downstream. As for Performer, the performance gap between upstream and downstream seems to be even wider. It is worth noting that the downstream tasks of SuperGLUE often require pseudo-cross-attention on the encoder, which models such as convolution cannot handle (Tay et al., 2021a).

Therefore, researchers have found that although some models have good upstream performance, they may still have difficulty learning downstream tasks.

New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

#Is the best model different at each scale?

Figure 1 below shows the Pareto frontier when calculated in terms of upstream or downstream performance. The colors of the plot represent different models, and it can be observed that the best model may be different for each scale and calculation area. Additionally, this can also be seen in Figure 3 above. For example, the Evolved Transformer seems to perform just as well as the standard Transformer in the tiny to small region (downstream), but this changes quickly when scaling up the model. The researchers also observed this in MoS-Transformer, which performed significantly better than the ordinary Transformer in some areas, but not in other areas.

New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

Scaling law of each model

Table 2 below shows the fitting of each model in various situations The slope of the linear straight line α. The researchers obtained α by plotting F (FLOPs), U (upstream perplexity), D (downstream accuracy), and P (number of parameters). Generally speaking, α describes the scalability of the model, e.g. α_F,U plots FLOPs against upstream performance. The only exception is α_U,D, which is a measure of upstream and downstream performance, with high α_U,D values ​​meaning better model scaling to downstream tasks. Overall, the alpha value is a measure of how well a model performs relative to scaling.

New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

Do Scaling Protocols affect model architecture in the same way?

Figure 4 below shows the impact of scaling depth in four model architectures (MoS-Transformer, Transformer, Evolved Transformer, LConv).

New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

Figure 5 below shows the impact of scaling width across the same four architectures. First, on the upstream (negative log-perplexity) curve it can be noticed that although there are clear differences in absolute performance between different architectures, the scaling trends remain very similar. Downstream, with the exception of LConv, deep scaling (Figure 4 above) appears to work the same on most architectures. Also, it seems that the Evolved Transformer is slightly better at applying width scaling relative to width scaling. It is worth noting that depth scaling has a much greater impact on downstream scaling compared to width scaling.

New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?

For more research details, please refer to the original paper.

The above is the detailed content of New research from Google and DeepMind: How does inductive bias affect model scaling?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement
This article is reproduced at:51CTO.COM. If there is any infringement, please contact admin@php.cn delete
从VAE到扩散模型:一文解读以文生图新范式从VAE到扩散模型:一文解读以文生图新范式Apr 08, 2023 pm 08:41 PM

1 前言在发布DALL·E的15个月后,OpenAI在今年春天带了续作DALL·E 2,以其更加惊艳的效果和丰富的可玩性迅速占领了各大AI社区的头条。近年来,随着生成对抗网络(GAN)、变分自编码器(VAE)、扩散模型(Diffusion models)的出现,深度学习已向世人展现其强大的图像生成能力;加上GPT-3、BERT等NLP模型的成功,人类正逐步打破文本和图像的信息界限。在DALL·E 2中,只需输入简单的文本(prompt),它就可以生成多张1024*1024的高清图像。这些图像甚至

找不到中文语音预训练模型?中文版 Wav2vec 2.0和HuBERT来了找不到中文语音预训练模型?中文版 Wav2vec 2.0和HuBERT来了Apr 08, 2023 pm 06:21 PM

Wav2vec 2.0 [1],HuBERT [2] 和 WavLM [3] 等语音预训练模型,通过在多达上万小时的无标注语音数据(如 Libri-light )上的自监督学习,显著提升了自动语音识别(Automatic Speech Recognition, ASR),语音合成(Text-to-speech, TTS)和语音转换(Voice Conversation,VC)等语音下游任务的性能。然而这些模型都没有公开的中文版本,不便于应用在中文语音研究场景。 WenetSpeech [4] 是

普林斯顿陈丹琦:如何让「大模型」变小普林斯顿陈丹琦:如何让「大模型」变小Apr 08, 2023 pm 04:01 PM

“Making large models smaller”这是很多语言模型研究人员的学术追求,针对大模型昂贵的环境和训练成本,陈丹琦在智源大会青源学术年会上做了题为“Making large models smaller”的特邀报告。报告中重点提及了基于记忆增强的TRIME算法和基于粗细粒度联合剪枝和逐层蒸馏的CofiPruning算法。前者能够在不改变模型结构的基础上兼顾语言模型困惑度和检索速度方面的优势;而后者可以在保证下游任务准确度的同时实现更快的处理速度,具有更小的模型结构。陈丹琦 普

解锁CNN和Transformer正确结合方法,字节跳动提出有效的下一代视觉Transformer解锁CNN和Transformer正确结合方法,字节跳动提出有效的下一代视觉TransformerApr 09, 2023 pm 02:01 PM

由于复杂的注意力机制和模型设计,大多数现有的视觉 Transformer(ViT)在现实的工业部署场景中不能像卷积神经网络(CNN)那样高效地执行。这就带来了一个问题:视觉神经网络能否像 CNN 一样快速推断并像 ViT 一样强大?近期一些工作试图设计 CNN-Transformer 混合架构来解决这个问题,但这些工作的整体性能远不能令人满意。基于此,来自字节跳动的研究者提出了一种能在现实工业场景中有效部署的下一代视觉 Transformer——Next-ViT。从延迟 / 准确性权衡的角度看,

Stable Diffusion XL 现已推出—有什么新功能,你知道吗?Stable Diffusion XL 现已推出—有什么新功能,你知道吗?Apr 07, 2023 pm 11:21 PM

3月27号,Stability AI的创始人兼首席执行官Emad Mostaque在一条推文中宣布,Stable Diffusion XL 现已可用于公开测试。以下是一些事项:“XL”不是这个新的AI模型的官方名称。一旦发布稳定性AI公司的官方公告,名称将会更改。与先前版本相比,图像质量有所提高与先前版本相比,图像生成速度大大加快。示例图像让我们看看新旧AI模型在结果上的差异。Prompt: Luxury sports car with aerodynamic curves, shot in a

五年后AI所需算力超100万倍!十二家机构联合发表88页长文:「智能计算」是解药五年后AI所需算力超100万倍!十二家机构联合发表88页长文:「智能计算」是解药Apr 09, 2023 pm 07:01 PM

人工智能就是一个「拼财力」的行业,如果没有高性能计算设备,别说开发基础模型,就连微调模型都做不到。但如果只靠拼硬件,单靠当前计算性能的发展速度,迟早有一天无法满足日益膨胀的需求,所以还需要配套的软件来协调统筹计算能力,这时候就需要用到「智能计算」技术。最近,来自之江实验室、中国工程院、国防科技大学、浙江大学等多达十二个国内外研究机构共同发表了一篇论文,首次对智能计算领域进行了全面的调研,涵盖了理论基础、智能与计算的技术融合、重要应用、挑战和未来前景。论文链接:​https://spj.scien

​什么是Transformer机器学习模型?​什么是Transformer机器学习模型?Apr 08, 2023 pm 06:31 PM

译者 | 李睿审校 | 孙淑娟​近年来, Transformer 机器学习模型已经成为深度学习和深度神经网络技术进步的主要亮点之一。它主要用于自然语言处理中的高级应用。谷歌正在使用它来增强其搜索引擎结果。OpenAI 使用 Transformer 创建了著名的 GPT-2和 GPT-3模型。自从2017年首次亮相以来,Transformer 架构不断发展并扩展到多种不同的变体,从语言任务扩展到其他领域。它们已被用于时间序列预测。它们是 DeepMind 的蛋白质结构预测模型 AlphaFold

AI模型告诉你,为啥巴西最可能在今年夺冠!曾精准预测前两届冠军AI模型告诉你,为啥巴西最可能在今年夺冠!曾精准预测前两届冠军Apr 09, 2023 pm 01:51 PM

说起2010年南非世界杯的最大网红,一定非「章鱼保罗」莫属!这只位于德国海洋生物中心的神奇章鱼,不仅成功预测了德国队全部七场比赛的结果,还顺利地选出了最终的总冠军西班牙队。不幸的是,保罗已经永远地离开了我们,但它的「遗产」却在人们预测足球比赛结果的尝试中持续存在。在艾伦图灵研究所(The Alan Turing Institute),随着2022年卡塔尔世界杯的持续进行,三位研究员Nick Barlow、Jack Roberts和Ryan Chan决定用一种AI算法预测今年的冠军归属。预测模型图

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator

AI Hentai Generator

Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Repo: How To Revive Teammates
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
R.E.P.O. Energy Crystals Explained and What They Do (Yellow Crystal)
2 weeks agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Hello Kitty Island Adventure: How To Get Giant Seeds
1 months agoBy尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download

A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows

This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

PhpStorm Mac version

PhpStorm Mac version

The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse

Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.