How are 'pop-ups' developed? State-driven or imperative?
This article brings you relevant knowledge about front-end development pop-up windows. It mainly introduces how front-end development engineers can quickly and efficiently develop pop-up windows. For those who are interested, let’s take a look below. I hope it will be useful to everyone. helpful.
As a front-end development engineer, developing various pop-up windows is commonplace, but how to do it quickly, efficiently and with a unified style is a problem.
State driven
In today's front-end technology stacks are Vue
, React
, using state driven is a common way. For example, if we want to introduce a pop-up window to our page, click a button to pop up:
<template> <div> <Modal1 v-show="visible" @close="closeModal" /> <button @click="showModal" >click</button> </div> </template> <script> import Modal1 from './modals/Modal1.vue' export default { components: { Modal1 }, data() { return { visible: false } }, methods: { // 弹出弹窗 showModal(){ this.visible = true }, // 关闭弹窗,并传回数据 closeModal(data) { this.visible = false // 拿到 data todo something } } }
There is a problem with the above. The variables that control the display and hiding of the pop-up window, the logic for displaying the pop-up window, and the callback logic for closing the pop-up window are scattered in different places. The place.
Assuming that this page has more than one pop-up window, then write it like this:
<template> <div> <Modal1 v-show="visible1" @close="closeModal1" /> <Modal2 v-show="visible2" @close="closeModal2" /> <Modal3 v-show="visible3" @close="closeModal3" /> <button @click="showModal1" >click</button> <button @click="showModal2" >click</button> <button @click="showModal3" >click</button> </div> </template> <script> import Modal1 from './modals/Modal1.vue' import Modal2 from './modals/Modal2.vue' import Modal3 from './modals/Modal3.vue' export default { components: { Modal1, Modal2, Modal3 }, data() { return { visible1: false, visible2: false, visible3: false, } }, methods: { // 弹出弹窗 showModal1(){ this.visible1 = true }, // 关闭弹窗,并传回数据 closeModal1(data) { this.visible1 = false // 拿到 data todo something }, showModal2(){ this.visible2 = true }, // 关闭弹窗,并传回数据 closeModal2(data) { this.visible2 = false // 拿到 data todo something }, showModal3(){ this.visible3 = true }, // 关闭弹窗,并传回数据 closeModal3(data) { this.visible3 = false // 拿到 data todo something }, } }
It is not too verbose to write like this.
Imperative Development (Functional)
I developed promise-modal This library can be used to develop Promise functional pop-ups in React projects.
Installation
npm i promise-modal
Use
your Modal component to write like this, we will pass in the two props callbackResolve
and callbackReject
In your component, you need to call them when closing the Modal.
import React, { useState } from 'react' import { Modal, Button } from 'antd' import PropTypes from 'prop-types' const TestModal = (props) => { const { title, callbackResolve, callbackReject } = props const [isModalVisible, setIsModalVisible] = useState(true) const handleOk = () => { setIsModalVisible(false) callbackResolve(true) } const handleCancel = () => { setIsModalVisible(false) callbackReject(false) } return ( <Modal destroyOnClose title={title} visible={isModalVisible} onOk={handleOk} onCancel={handleCancel}> <p>Some contents...</p> <p>Some contents...</p> </Modal> ) } TestModal.propTypes = { title: PropTypes.string.isRequired, callbackResolve: PropTypes.func.isRequired, callbackReject: PropTypes.func.isRequired, } export default TestModal
Pass your Modal component into the create function
import { create } from 'promise-modal' import TestModal from './TestModal' // 如果你使用 Class 组件 export default (data) => create(TestModal, data) // 如果你使用函数式组件和 hooks,你必须创建一个自定义 hooks 返回 export const useTestModal = () => { const showTestModal = (data) => create(TestModal, data) return showTestModal }
Use Modal in business code, just like the Promise function.
import { useTestModal } from './modals/TestModal' const showTestModal = useTestModal() // use Promise.then showTestModal({ title: 'Test Modal', }) .then((response) => { console.log('response: ', response) }) .catch((error) => { console.log('error: ', error) }) // use await const res = await showTestModal({ title: 'Test Modal', }) console.log('res: ', res) // do something here
Of course, there has always been controversy between imperative and state-driven development:
This is You Yuxi’s point of view, supporting state-driven development:
There are also some netizens who support imperative style:
Intercepted fragments:
For the user, he only needs to focus on what he wants to show and the rules to show, without additional Pay attention to irrelevant logic such as showing and hiding the pop-up window - the call itself is to be displayed.
Changed to an imperative call, the user does not need to introduce components, mount components, declare callbacks, interrupt the logic flow, and can only focus on their own data.
My opinion
- When the state drives multiple pop-up components, the code is too redundant.
- For large teams, front-line business developers have different levels of levels, different code styles, decentralized state drivers, and everyone has different styles such as variable naming. The styles cannot be unified, resulting in messy code. Unable to maintain.
- Promise functional style means that users of pop-up windows do not need to care about logic such as display and hiding. The principle of proximity is that only when the business reaches this point and the pop-up window should appear, the corresponding pop-up window function is called.
- Of course, this method increases the work of pop-up window developers, but reduces the mental burden of pop-up window users.
- This library implicitly passes in two props,
callbackResolve
andcallbackReject
. The dependency source is unclear, which brings new mental burden. I don’t have a good idea for the moment, so PR is welcome.
Finally
When developing pop-up windows, would you rather use state-driven or imperative methods? Is imperative suitable for your team or project? Give it a try.
Related tutorials: "Web front-end development video tutorial"
The above is the detailed content of How are 'pop-ups' developed? State-driven or imperative?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools
