Home >Java >javaTutorial >Extension of custom annotations based on shiro - detailed explanation with pictures and text
Here we mainly adopt shiro's custom annotation solution. This article mainly solves the following problems.
How to associate the page with the api interface through logic.
Usage of shiro’s own annotations.
How to write custom annotations.
In the structural relationship between tables, the page and interface tables are ultimately associated with the permissions table (For details, please see my previous article "Miscellaneous Talk about Permission Design").
We now hope to replace it with another solution to achieve a low cost while taking into account a certain degree of permission control. Here we introduce two concepts. Business module, Operation type.
Business module
Concept: Abstracting the business module in the system into a kind of data, we can Express it in the form of a string, for example: role management corresponds to role-manage, user management corresponds to user-manage, etc. We divide the business modules existing in the system through the "principle of least privilege" and finally form a batch of distributable data.
Principles of use: The api interface, page and function are essentially logically related to the business module. Therefore, we can use the api interface and page ( and function points) to perform logical matching to determine the relationship between the page and the interface.
Operation type
Concept: Abstract all operation types in the system into one We can also express this kind of data in the form of strings, for example: add corresponds to new addition, allot corresponds to allocation, etc. We divide all operation types in the system through "data licenses" according to business modules, and finally form a batch of distributable data.
Usage Principle: The page is the display, the function point is the action, and the interface is the resource provision for the final action. The resources to be called are determined through the "business module" , the "operation type" determines how the resource is used. Through the two, you can roughly and accurately determine whether the interface triggered by the function point of the page is within the authentication.
Now that these two concepts are proposed, what is their final actual use? Let us first think about it from the following perspectives.
Is the data in the page table in the database or the api interface table true and valid?
The actual use of the page or interface is based on the existence of functions or the existence of data in the database table.
In the permission structure, is the only way to store "control objects" is the database?
Let's look at these issues from the conclusion. First of all, the "control object" can be stored not only in the database but also in the code or in the configuration file. It does not necessarily have to be In the database; then to answer the second question, when the interface information exists in the database but the server has not developed this interface, there is a problem with the database information itself, or the new interface in the database must be the server side The interface that has been deployed can take effect; then there is the first question, then the data in the "control object" table in the database is not necessarily true and valid. So we can come up with the following solution
We can use the annotation form to supplement the data information of "Business Module" and "Operation Type" on the interface, Both types of information can be stored in constant classes.
When adding and creating the page table structure and page function table structure in the database, add the "Business Module" and "Operation Type" fields .
You can store the "business module" and "operation type" information in the dictionary table of the database.
The addition of modules or operations will inevitably bring about the addition of interfaces, which will lead to a system deployment activity. This operation and maintenance cost cannot be reduced. It cannot be reduced by table structure.
However, this solution is only suitable for non-strong control interface projects. In strong control interface projects, the page and the interface must still be bound, although this will bring huge operation and maintenance costs. In addition, it can also be divided by interface routing rules, for example: /api/page/xxxx/ (only used for pages), /api/mobile/xxxxx (only used for mobile terminals) will classify interfaces that are only used by pages. This The class interface only performs authentication but not authorization, which can also achieve the purpose.
After a theoretical idea is approved, the rest is put into technical practice. We use the security framework of Apache Shiro here. , applied in Spring Boot environment. Briefly explain the following annotations of Shiro.
Annotation name | Function |
---|---|
Acts on classes, methods, and instances. When called, the current subject must be authenticated. | |
acts on classes, methods, and instances. When called, the subject can be in the guest state. | |
Acts on classes, methods, and instances. When calling, you need to determine whether the project contains the Permission (permission information) in the current interface. | |
acts on classes, methods, and instances. When calling, you need to determine whether the subject contains the Role (role information) in the current interface. | |
acts on classes, methods, and instances. When calling, it is necessary to determine whether the subject is a user currently in the application. |
/** * 用于认证的接口的注解,组合形式默认是“或”的关系 */ @Target({ElementType.METHOD}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) public @interface Auth { /** * 业务模块 * @return */ String[] module(); /** * 操作类型 */ String[] action(); }
/** * Auth注解的操作类 */ public class AuthHandler extends AuthorizingAnnotationHandler { public AuthHandler() { //写入注解 super(Auth.class); } @Override public void assertAuthorized(Annotation a) throws AuthorizationException { if (a instanceof Auth) { Auth annotation = (Auth) a; String[] module = annotation.module(); String[] action = annotation.action(); //1.获取当前主题 Subject subject = this.getSubject(); //2.验证是否包含当前接口的权限有一个通过则通过 boolean hasAtLeastOnePermission = false; for(String m:module){ for(String ac:action){ //使用hutool的字符串工具类 String permission = StrFormatter.format("{}:{}",m,ac); if(subject.isPermitted(permission)){ hasAtLeastOnePermission=true; break; } } } if(!hasAtLeastOnePermission){ throw new AuthorizationException("没有访问此接口的权限"); } } } }
/** * 拦截器 */ public class AuthMethodInterceptor extends AuthorizingAnnotationMethodInterceptor { public AuthMethodInterceptor() { super(new AuthHandler()); } public AuthMethodInterceptor(AnnotationResolver resolver) { super(new AuthHandler(), resolver); } @Override public void assertAuthorized(MethodInvocation mi) throws AuthorizationException { // 验证权限 try { ((AuthHandler) this.getHandler()).assertAuthorized(getAnnotation(mi)); } catch (AuthorizationException ae) { if (ae.getCause() == null) { ae.initCause(new AuthorizationException("当前的方法没有通过鉴权: " + mi.getMethod())); } throw ae; } } }
/** * shiro的aop切面 */ public class AuthAopInterceptor extends AopAllianceAnnotationsAuthorizingMethodInterceptor { public AuthAopInterceptor() { super(); // 添加自定义的注解拦截器 this.methodInterceptors.add(new AuthMethodInterceptor(new SpringAnnotationResolver())); } }
/** * 启动自定义注解 */ public class ShiroAdvisor extends AuthorizationAttributeSourceAdvisor { public ShiroAdvisor() { // 这里可以添加多个 setAdvice(new AuthAopInterceptor()); } @SuppressWarnings({"unchecked"}) @Override public boolean matches(Method method, Class targetClass) { Method m = method; if (targetClass != null) { try { m = targetClass.getMethod(m.getName(), m.getParameterTypes()); return this.isFrameAnnotation(m); } catch (NoSuchMethodException ignored) { } } return super.matches(method, targetClass); } private boolean isFrameAnnotation(Method method) { return null != AnnotationUtils.findAnnotation(method, Auth.class); } }The overall sequence of ideas: define
annotation class (define variables that can be used by the business) ->Defineannotation processing class(do business logic processing through variables in the annotation)->Defineannotation interceptor->defineaop aspect class->Finally define Shiro’s custom annotation enablement class. The writing ideas for other custom annotations are similar to this one.Related recommendations:
Custom annotation mapping thinkPHP21 custom tag library import method detailed explanation
About custom annotations in Java Detailed introduction
Detailed explanation of shiro authorization implementation
The above is the detailed content of Extension of custom annotations based on shiro - detailed explanation with pictures and text. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!