Below I will share with you an article (detailed explanation) on the differences between various sorting methods and sort methods based on js. It has a good reference value and I hope it will be helpful to everyone.
I had a whim today and wanted to know whether the sort method has advantages over various sortings, so I made a test by referring to other people's codes. The results were surprising. Here is the code.
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=0"> <title>图片列表生成交互组件</title> <style> * { margin: 0; border: 0; } html, body { height: 100%; } #p { height: 100%; width: 100%; } </style> </head> <body> <p id="p"></p> <script src="myNeedExtend.js"></script> <script> // ---------- 一些排序算法 Sort = { // 利用sort进行排序 systemSort:function(array){ return array.sort(function(a, b){ return a - b; }); }, // 冒泡排序 bubbleSort:function(array){ var i = 0, len = array.length, j, d; for(; i<len; i++){ for(j=0; j<len; j++){ if(array[i] < array[j]){ d = array[j]; array[j] = array[i]; array[i] = d; } } } return array; }, // 快速排序 quickSort:function(array){ //var array = [8,4,6,2,7,9,3,5,74,5]; //var array =[0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 0; var j = array.length - 1; var Sort = function(i, j){ // 结束条件 if(i == j ){ return }; var key = array[i]; var tempi = i; // 记录开始位置 var tempj = j; // 记录结束位置 while(j > i){ // j <<-------------- 向前查找 if(array[j] >= key){ j--; }else{ array[i] = array[j] //i++ ------------>>向后查找 while(j > ++i){ if(array[i] > key){ array[j] = array[i]; break; } } } } // 如果第一个取出的 key 是最小的数 if(tempi == i){ Sort(++i, tempj); return ; } // 最后一个空位留给 key array[i] = key; // 递归 Sort(tempi, i); Sort(j, tempj); } Sort(i, j); return array; }, // 插入排序 insertSort:function(array){ // http://baike.baidu.com/image/d57e99942da24e5dd21b7080 // http://baike.baidu.com/view/396887.htm // var array = [0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 1, j, temp, key, len = array.length; for(; i < len; i++){ temp = j = i; key = array[j]; while(--j > -1){ if(array[j] > key){ array[j+1] = array[j]; }else{ break; } } array[j+1] = key; } return array; }, // 希尔排序 shellSort:function(array){ // http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/%E5%B8%8C%E5%B0%94%E6%8E%92%E5%BA%8F // var array = [13,14,94,33,82,25,59,94,65,23,45,27,73,25,39,10]; // var tempArr = [1750, 701, 301, 132, 57, 23, 10, 4, 1]; // reverse() 在维基上看到这个最优的步长 较小数组 var tempArr = [1031612713, 217378076, 45806244, 9651787, 2034035, 428481, 90358, 19001, 4025, 836, 182, 34, 9, 1]; //针对大数组的步长选择 var i = 0; var tempArrLength = tempArr.length; var len = array.length; var len2 = parseInt(len/2); for(;i < tempArrLength; i++){ if(tempArr[i] > len2){ continue; } tempSort(tempArr[i]); } // 排序一个步长 function tempSort(temp){ //console.log(temp) 使用的步长统计 var i = 0, j = 0, f, tem, key; var tempLen = len%temp > 0 ? parseInt(len/temp) + 1 : len/temp; for(;i < temp; i++){// 依次循环列 for(j=1;/*j < tempLen && */temp * j + i < len; j++){ //依次循环每列的每行 tem = f = temp * j + i; key = array[f]; while((tem-=temp) >= 0){ // 依次向上查找 if(array[tem] > key){ array[tem+temp] = array[tem]; }else{ break; } } array[tem + temp ] = key; } } } return array; } }; testArrs = []; for (var i = 10000000; i > 0; i--) { testArrs.push(i); } function test(fun,arr) { console.log(arr); var oldTime = +new Date(); var new_arr = Sort[fun](arr); var newTime = +new Date(); console.log(new_arr); console.log(newTime-oldTime); } /* * sort排序 systemSort * 冒泡排序 bubbleSort * 快速排序 quickSort * 插入排序 insertSort * 希尔排序 shellSort * * */ test("systemSort",testArrs); </script> </body> </html>
The above method passes the test time, and then analyzes which sorting method saves time. Time is life. Using the correct method can save a lot of time, especially when big data is running.
First look at the time it takes to process an array of 10,000 lengths:
* sort sorting systemSort 11
* Bubble sort bubbleSort 169
* quick sort quickSort 144
* insertion sort insertSort 139
* Hill sort shellSort 3
Test 100,000-long array data:
* sort sorting systemSort 63
* Bubble sorting bubbleSort 16268
* Quick sorting quickSort reports an error directly
* Insertion sorting insertSort 13026
* Hill sorting shellSort 8
Test an array with a length of one million:
* sort sort systemSort 575
* Bubble sort bubbleSort time unknown
* Quick sort quickSort reports an error directly
* Insertion sort insertSort crashes directly
* Hill sort shellSort 93
Test an array of 10 million long:
* sort sorting systemSort 7039
* Bubble sort bubbleSort not tested
* quick sort quickSort not tested
* insertion sort insertSort not tested
* Hill sorting shellSort 1225
Testing an array of 100 million long:
* sort systemSort crashes directly
* Bubble sort bubbleSort not tested
* Fast Sort quickSort Not tested
* Insertion sort insertSort Not tested
* Hill sort shellSort 19864
Finally passed the test,In the worst case , I found that Hill sorting is still the best, and it is even faster than the system sorting. It is really surprising. In this way, everyone can see what method needs to be used for sorting under what circumstances.
Then We test under random conditions:
<!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=0"> <title>图片列表生成交互组件</title> <style> * { margin: 0; border: 0; } html, body { height: 100%; } #p { height: 100%; width: 100%; } </style> </head> <body> <p id="p"></p> <script src="myNeedExtend.js"></script> <script> // ---------- 一些排序算法 Sort = { // 利用sort进行排序 systemSort:function(array){ return array.sort(function(a, b){ return a - b; }); }, // 冒泡排序 bubbleSort:function(array){ var i = 0, len = array.length, j, d; for(; i<len; i++){ for(j=0; j<len; j++){ if(array[i] < array[j]){ d = array[j]; array[j] = array[i]; array[i] = d; } } } return array; }, // 快速排序 quickSort:function(array){ //var array = [8,4,6,2,7,9,3,5,74,5]; //var array =[0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 0; var j = array.length - 1; var Sort = function(i, j){ // 结束条件 if(i == j ){ return }; var key = array[i]; var tempi = i; // 记录开始位置 var tempj = j; // 记录结束位置 while(j > i){ // j <<-------------- 向前查找 if(array[j] >= key){ j--; }else{ array[i] = array[j] //i++ ------------>>向后查找 while(j > ++i){ if(array[i] > key){ array[j] = array[i]; break; } } } } // 如果第一个取出的 key 是最小的数 if(tempi == i){ Sort(++i, tempj); return ; } // 最后一个空位留给 key array[i] = key; // 递归 Sort(tempi, i); Sort(j, tempj); } Sort(i, j); return array; }, // 插入排序 insertSort:function(array){ // http://baike.baidu.com/image/d57e99942da24e5dd21b7080 // http://baike.baidu.com/view/396887.htm // var array = [0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 1, j, temp, key, len = array.length; for(; i < len; i++){ temp = j = i; key = array[j]; while(--j > -1){ if(array[j] > key){ array[j+1] = array[j]; }else{ break; } } array[j+1] = key; } return array; }, // 希尔排序 shellSort:function(array){ // http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/%E5%B8%8C%E5%B0%94%E6%8E%92%E5%BA%8F // var array = [13,14,94,33,82,25,59,94,65,23,45,27,73,25,39,10]; // var tempArr = [1750, 701, 301, 132, 57, 23, 10, 4, 1]; // reverse() 在维基上看到这个最优的步长 较小数组 var tempArr = [1031612713, 217378076, 45806244, 9651787, 2034035, 428481, 90358, 19001, 4025, 836, 182, 34, 9, 1]; //针对大数组的步长选择 var i = 0; var tempArrLength = tempArr.length; var len = array.length; var len2 = parseInt(len/2); for(;i < tempArrLength; i++){ if(tempArr[i] > len2){ continue; } tempSort(tempArr[i]); } // 排序一个步长 function tempSort(temp){ //console.log(temp) 使用的步长统计 var i = 0, j = 0, f, tem, key; var tempLen = len%temp > 0 ? parseInt(len/temp) + 1 : len/temp; for(;i < temp; i++){// 依次循环列 for(j=1;/*j < tempLen && */temp * j + i < len; j++){ //依次循环每列的每行 tem = f = temp * j + i; key = array[f]; while((tem-=temp) >= 0){ // 依次向上查找 if(array[tem] > key){ array[tem+temp] = array[tem]; }else{ break; } } array[tem + temp ] = key; } } } return array; } }; testArrs = []; for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testArrs.push(Math.random()); } function test(fun,arr) { var oldTime = +new Date(); var new_arr = Sort[fun](arr); var newTime = +new Date(); console.log(fun); console.log(newTime-oldTime); } /* * sort排序 systemSort * 冒泡排序 bubbleSort * 快速排序 quickSort * 插入排序 insertSort * 希尔排序 shellSort * * */ test("systemSort",testArrs); //test("bubbleSort",testArrs); //test("quickSort",testArrs); test("insertSort",testArrs); test("shellSort",testArrs); </script> </body> </html>
Test a 10 million-long array:
* sort sorting systemSort 8842
* Bubble sort bubbleSort not tested
* Quick sort quickSort not tested
* Insertion sort insertSort 45
* Hill sort shellSort 1133
In unknown situations Under better circumstances, insertion sort is the most efficient
The above is what I compiled for everyone. I hope it will be helpful to everyone in the future.
Related articles:
Detailed explanation of the separation and combination of vue-admin and backend (flask)
Detailed explanation of the basics in Vue webpack Configuration
Explain the basic configuration in detail in Vue webpack
How to build a multi-person chat room in the nodejs express environment
The above is the detailed content of How to implement various sorting methods using js. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript is widely used in websites, mobile applications, desktop applications and server-side programming. 1) In website development, JavaScript operates DOM together with HTML and CSS to achieve dynamic effects and supports frameworks such as jQuery and React. 2) Through ReactNative and Ionic, JavaScript is used to develop cross-platform mobile applications. 3) The Electron framework enables JavaScript to build desktop applications. 4) Node.js allows JavaScript to run on the server side and supports high concurrent requests.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools