This article mainly introduces a brief discussion of webpack's processing of styles. Now I share it with you and give you a reference.
This article introduces the processing of styles by webpack and shares it with everyone. The details are as follows:
We can introduce style files in js
require('myStyle.css')
At this time we need to introduce the corresponding The webpack loader helps us parse this code.
css-loader with style-loader
First of all, we can introduce css-loader and style-loader to handle the parsing of css. Among them, css-loader is used To parse css files, style-loader is used to embed css files into js files
var path = require('path') module.exports = { context: path.join(__dirname, 'src') entry: './', module: { rules: [ { test: /\.css$/, include: [ path.join(__dirname, 'src') ], use: ['style-loader', 'css-loader'] } ] }, output: { path: path.join(__dirname, 'dist'), filename: '[name].bundle.[hash].js' } }
In the above code, the parsing order is from right to left, first use css-loader to parse out the css file After that, use style-loader to embed it into js code.
If you use less to write styles, you need to use less-loader to compile the style files into css files first, and then continue to use css-loader and style-loader. In addition, the loader loader can omit the following -loader. So the above code can be abbreviated to
module: { rules: [ { test: /\.css$/, include: [ path.join(__dirname, 'src') ], use: ['style', 'css', 'less'] } ] }
Generally, in the test environment, in order to compile css faster, this method will be used more often, but the js file compiled in this way will be relatively large, which is not suitable for production. environment.
Compile into a separate file
The above approach will package css and js together to reduce the number of actual requests, but because the compiled js file is relatively large , wasting bandwidth. Therefore, we use the extract-text-webpack-plugin plug-in to compile css files into independent files. We can use CDN to push this file to the node server, or load it on demand as appropriate, thereby optimizing the customer request link and accelerating page response.
var path = require('path'), ExtractTextPlugin = require('extract-text-webpack-plugin') module.exports = { context: path.join(__dirname, 'src'), entry: './', module: { rules: [{ test: /\.css$/, include: [ path.join(__dirname, 'src') ], use: ExtractTextPlugin.extract({ fallback: 'style', use: 'css' }) }] }, output: { path: path.join(__dirname, 'dist'), filename: '[name].bundle.[hash].js' }, plugins: [ new ExtractTextPlugin('[name].css') ] }
Through the above code, we use the extract-text-webpack-plugin plug-in to process all css files in the src directory. First, use the css-loader plug-in to parse out the css code. If the parsing fails, use style-loader The plug-in parses and finally generates the corresponding js file in the dist directory
Compatible with old browsers
In the past when we wrote styles, some styles required different browsers to add different Prefix, such as -webkit-. Now that we have the build tool, we no longer need to pay attention to these prefixes. The build tool will automatically add these prefixes for us.
For webpack, we naturally think that we need to use loader or plugin to help us do these things. After checking, we found that autoprefixer-loader has been abandoned and is no longer maintained. It is recommended to use posscss
postcss is used for The js plug-in that converts css styles in js needs to be used with other plug-ins. This is the same as babel6. It is just a converter itself and does not provide code parsing function.
Here we need the autoprefixer plugin to add prefixes to our styles. First download the module.
npm install -D autoprefixer
Then you can configure webpack
var autoprefixer = require('autoprefixer') module.exports = { ... module: { loaders: [ ... { { test: /\.css$/, loader: ExtractTextPlugin.extract(["css", "postcss"]) }, } ] }, postcss: [autoprefixer()], ... }
Look at the extracted style file and you will find that the prefix has been added
a { display: flex; } /*compiles to:*/ a { display: -webkit-box; display: -webkit-flex; display: -ms-flexbox; display: flex }
In addition, autoprefixer can also be used according to the target browser Versions generate different prefix numbers. For example, if most of the users of your application use a newer version of the browser, you can configure it as follows.
postcss: [autoprefixer({ browsers: ['last 2 versions'] })] This is the generated style, which will be a little different, or the above example
a { display: flex; } /*compiles to:*/ a { display: -webkit-flex; display: -ms-flexbox; display: flex; }
style Compression
We can use webpack's built-in plug-in UglifyJsPlugin to compress code, which can compress both js code and css code.
plugins: [ ... new webpack.optimize.UglifyJsPlugin({ compress: { warnings: false } }), ... ]
In fact, it cannot be said that it is compressing the css code. In essence, it is compressing the js code and then outputting this code to the css file.
Use CommonsChunkPlugin to extract public code
First of all, it must be clear that CommonsChunkPlugin is used when there are multiple entries, that is, when there are multiple entry files, these entry files There may be some common codes, and we can extract these common codes into independent files. It is very important to understand this. (It took me a long time to understand something, alas~~~~)
If the same css file is required in multiple entries, we can use CommonsChunkPlugin to extract these common style files into independent style file.
module.exports = { entry: { "A": "./src/entry.js", "B": "./src/entry2.js" }, ... plugins: [ new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin({ name: "commons", filename: "commons.js" }), ... ] }
Of course, not only common css will be extracted here, but if there is common js code, it will also be extracted into commons.js. There is an interesting phenomenon here. The name of the extracted css file will be the value of name in the parameter, and the js file name will be the value of filename.
CommonsChunkPlugin seems to only extract modules that are common to all chunks. If there are the following dependencies
// entry1.js var style1 = require('./style/myStyle.css') var style2 = require('./style/style.css') // entry2.js require("./style/myStyle.css") require("./style/myStyle2.css") // entry3.js require("./style/myStyle2.css")
After using the plug-in, you will find that the commons.css file is not generated at all.
If we only need to take the common code of the first two chunks, we can do this
module.exports = { entry: { "A": "./src/entry.js", "B": "./src/entry2.js", "C": "./src/entry3.js" }, ... plugins: [ new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin({ name: "commons", filename: "commons.js", chunks: ['A', 'B'] }), ... ] }
The above is what I compiled for everyone. I hope it will be helpful to everyone in the future.
Related articles:
About the child_process module in node (detailed tutorial)
What are the applications of child processes in Node.js Scenario
Detailed interpretation of the file system and stream in nodeJs
The above is the detailed content of How should webpack handle styles?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript is widely used in websites, mobile applications, desktop applications and server-side programming. 1) In website development, JavaScript operates DOM together with HTML and CSS to achieve dynamic effects and supports frameworks such as jQuery and React. 2) Through ReactNative and Ionic, JavaScript is used to develop cross-platform mobile applications. 3) The Electron framework enables JavaScript to build desktop applications. 4) Node.js allows JavaScript to run on the server side and supports high concurrent requests.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools