


How vue+springboot implements single sign-on cross-domain issues (detailed tutorial)
This article mainly introduces the solution to the cross-domain problem of single sign-on by separating the front-end and back-end of vue springboot. Friends who need it can refer to it
I have been working on a back-end management system recently, and the front-end is very popular nowadays. vue.js, the background is based on springboot. Because the backend system does not have a login function, but the company requires unified login, the login authentication uses the authentication system of the .net project team. That means doing single sign-on. As for students who don’t know what single sign-on is, I suggest you go to the all-purpose Du Niang.
When I first received this requirement, I thought with disdain: Just logging in is not important. However, the development process slapped me hard (a hot slap). . . , so I must record this lesson carefully this time to avoid stepping into such pitfalls in the future.
The first problem I faced was cross-domain. The browser console directly reported CORS. With my many years of development experience, I decisively configured the cross-domain configuration in the background. The code is as follows:
@Configuration public class CorsConfiguration { @Bean public WebMvcConfigurer corsConfigurer() { return new WebMvcConfigurerAdapter() { @Override public void addCorsMappings(CorsRegistry registry) { registry.addMapping("/**") .allowedHeaders("*") .allowedMethods("*") .allowedOrigins("*"); } }; } }
This configuration allows all mapping, all request headers, all request methods, and all sources. After changing the configuration, I decisively restarted the project to see the effect. I found that there was no way to redirect to the single sign-in page. Seeing that the browser error was caused by cross-domain, I first added the code of my login interceptor
public boolean preHandle(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, Object handler) throws Exception { //用户已经登录 if (request.getSession().getAttribute("user") != null) { return true; } //从单点登录返回之后的状态,本系统还不处于登录状态 //根据code值去获取access_token,然后再根据access_token去获取用户信息,并将用户信息存到session中 String state = request.getParameter("state"); String uri = getUri(request); if (isLoginFromSSO(state)) { String code = request.getParameter("code"); Object cacheUrl = request.getSession().getAttribute(state); if (cacheUrl == null) { response.sendRedirect(uri); return false; } HttpUtil client = new HttpUtil(); StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); sb.append("code=").append(code) .append("&grant_type=").append("authorization_code") .append("&client_id=").append(SSOAuth.ClientID) .append("&client_secret=").append(SSOAuth.ClientSecret) .append("&redirect_uri=").append(URLEncoder.encode((String) cacheUrl)); String resp = client.post(SSOAuth.AccessTokenUrl, sb.toString()); Map<String, String> map = new Gson().fromJson(resp, Map.class); //根据access_token去获取用户信息 String accessToken = map.get("access_token"); HttpUtil http = new HttpUtil(); http.addHeader("Authorization", "Bearer " + accessToken); String encrypt = http.get(SSOAuth.UserUrl); String userinfo = decryptUserInfo(encrypt); //封装成user对象 User user = new Gson().fromJson(userinfo, User.class); request.getSession().setAttribute("user", user); return true; } //跳转到单点登录界面 state = Const._SSO_LOGIN + Const.UNDERLINE + RandomUtil.getUUID(); request.getSession().setAttribute(state, uri); String redirectUrl = buildAuthCodeUrl(uri, state); response.sendRedirect(redirectUrl); return false; }
The front-end vue requests the back-end login interface directly using
window.location.href=this.$api.config.baseUrl+"/system/user/login"
and then the front-end accesses the system , you can jump directly to the single sign-on page. But when I entered my account and password and clicked to log in, I jumped back to the system and found that all request data interfaces could not be accessed normally. Debug found that all requests did not carry user information and were recognized by the interceptor as not logged in, so all requests could not pass. .
Why am I clearly logged in and the interceptor also sets user information to the session? Why are the cookies gone? I initiated a request again and found that the JsessionId of each request was different. After checking a lot of information, I found that I needed to add a configuration that allows authentication information to be added to the front end
axios.defaults.withCredentials=true;
The background also needs to make a corresponding configuration allowCredentials(true);
@Bean public WebMvcConfigurer corsConfigurer() { return new WebMvcConfigurerAdapter() { @Override public void addCorsMappings(CorsRegistry registry) { registry.addMapping("/**") .allowedHeaders("*") .allowedMethods("*") .allowedOrigins("*").allowCredentials(true); } }; }
After adding this configuration, re-execute the operation process and find that it works normally after logging in. Jump to the system and the page data is displayed normally.
Just when I thought I was done, I suddenly clicked on a page and the data could not be displayed normally. I was so confused. I quickly F12 and found a request method I had never seen before, the OPTIONS request. It turns out that this request method is obviously POST, why did it become OPTIONS? So I ordered several other POST requests and found that they all turned into OPTIONS requests. I was confused and quickly checked the information of OPTIONS requests. The Internet said that OPTIONS requests are called "pre-check requests", which means that in your formal Before the request is executed, the browser will first initiate a pre-check request. Only after the pre-check request passes can the formal request be executed. After reading it, I suddenly realized that OPTIONS was intercepted, so I could no longer execute my POST request. Then I just let the pre-check request pass. Just add this judgment to the interceptor
//option预检查,直接通过请求 if ("OPTIONS".equals(request.getMethod())){ return true; }
In this way, if the interceptor finds that the request is a pre-check request, it will pass directly and the next step can be performed. POST request.
The above is what I compiled for everyone. I hope it will be helpful to everyone in the future.
Related articles:
Solving the problem that webpack cannot access 127.0.0.1
##Using Async and Await function
Passing template to component in Angular
The above is the detailed content of How vue+springboot implements single sign-on cross-domain issues (detailed tutorial). For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
