


A simple application based on Ajax form submission and background processing
Below I will bring you a simple application based on Ajax form submission and background processing. Let me share it with you now and give it as a reference for everyone.
First of all, let’s talk about form submission. To submit the form, you must first collect the form data (as for verification, I won’t talk about it. I’ll leave it for next time). With jquery, you can get the html. The value is still as simple as $("xxid").val() and so on, but if a form collects a lot of data, and there are many forms like this, it will definitely be troublesome to use this method, and it is easy to make mistakes in recording. Therefore, we can simply define a collection rule. For example, we can mark the data form control that is to be sent back to the server, and then retrieve the marked data together.
Let’s take the simplest stylistic input as an exampleUs Add a "datafield" attribute, and the stored value is the attribute name of the corresponding server-related class. With this mark, it will be easier to retrieve data at the front desk.
We can define a general method such as the following code
getFormData: function(formid) { var data = {}; //获取TEXT文件内容 $("#" + formid + " input[type=text]").each(function(i, o) { var jo = $(o); if (jo.attr("datafield")) { var str = jo.val(); str = str.replace(" ", ""); if (str !== "") { data[jo.attr("datafield")] = jo.val(); } } }); return data; }
This is a simple way to get all the text in the form and put it into a data object. As for I won’t go into details about how to get the values of other form controls, the principles are similar.
The next step is to send the data to the server. I will directly use ajax with jquery here.
var save = function(sender) { $(sender).prop("disabled", true); //禁用按钮,防止重复发送 var data = getFormData("form1"); var jsonobj = { jsondata: data }; var textdata = JSON.stringify(jsonobj); $.ajax({ type: "POST", contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", url: "xxxxx.aspx/Save", dataType: "json", data: textdata, success: function(msg) { if (msg.d == "1") { document.form1.reset(); alert("保存成功!"); } else if (msg.d == "0") { alert("保存失败!"); } }, complete: function(jqXHR, textStatus) { $(sender).prop("disabled", false); //还原按钮 } }); }
The "xxxxx.aspx/Save" here is the ajax processing page, and the other is a webmethod. We have done some processing to prevent customers from being too fast, service processing being too slow, and repeated clicks.
Such a form data collection and return to the server is completed. The JSON.stringify method of json2.js is used here to uniformly convert objects into json characters. The advantage is that you don’t have to consider the format of json to spell the json string yourself. It is simple and clean.
Then the client has collected the data, and the server should process the data. The key of the data we come from the front desk (json key) cannot all include all attributes of a certain data class. There are also many data classes, and only the server knows which class it is. So here we need to write a helper conversion class. There is another problem here. There may be many data classes. Do I have to write a method for each class? Isn’t that a pitfall? So we analyze the data format transmitted from the client to the server. It is a set of key-value pairs and does not repeat. It is equivalent to a Dictionary
After talking about so much, post the core code
public static T1 UpdateObjectByDic<T1>(T1 scrobj, IDictionary<string, string> sourceobject, bool ignoreCase) where T1 : new() { T1 result = scrobj; PropertyInfo[] pifresults = typeof(T1).GetProperties(); foreach (var dic in sourceobject) { foreach (PropertyInfo pifresult in pifresults) { if (string.Compare(dic.Key, pifresult.Name, ignoreCase) == 0) { pifresult.SetValue(result, ChangeType(dic.Value, pifresult.PropertyType), null); break; } } } return result; } public static Object ChangeType(object value, Type targetType) { Type convertType = targetType; if (targetType.IsGenericType && targetType.GetGenericTypeDefinition().Equals(typeof(Nullable<>))) { NullableConverter nullableConverter = new NullableConverter(targetType); convertType = nullableConverter.UnderlyingType; } return Convert.ChangeType(value, convertType); }
My T1 scrobj here is to make updates together. If a form is added, it is passed A new object comes in. If the order is updated, the original form data is passed in. By the way, here is the ChangeType method. Others are that some attributes in the data class are nullable (int? DateTime?, etc.). The traditional Convert.ChangeType will have exceptions, so I simply changed it. ignoreCase is the attribute (the value corresponding to the datafield in the front desk) Check whether it handles upper and lower case (usually regardless of case, if you want to handle case, I believe you will be drowned by the front desk's saliva).
This completes the background data processing core, and the calling part of the code is also posted
[WebMethod(EnableSession = true)] public static string Save(Dictionary<string, string> jsondata) { string result = "0"; Model.Project pro = ConvertHandle.UpdateObjectByDic< Model.Project>(jsondata,new Model.Project,true); pro.CreatorID = BLL.Sys_User.GetCurUser().ID.ToString(); pro.CreatorName = BLL.Sys_User.GetCurUser().Name; prohandle.Insert(pro); result = "1"; return result; }
Here is the core usage of the background specific processing method call, prohandle.Insert(pro) saves the class into the database , pro.CreatorID, pro.CreatorName are some other information about the project, which I won’t go into. At this point, the front-end data collection and background processing of a form are all finished except for the saving part, haha.
Finally, this is just a simple application. Like the front-end collection I mentioned, many front-end js frameworks have already been developed, and the considerations are much more comprehensive than mine. For background processing, this is Based on my simple collection at the front desk, many third-party frameworks have complete systems, but what I am talking about here is just a simple idea. When you don’t have so many controls at the moment, can you easily follow this path? accomplish. Of course, I strongly recommend not to reinvent the wheel, but you must understand the core function and principle of the wheel.
The above is what I compiled for everyone. I hope it will be helpful to everyone in the future.
Related articles:
MVC meets ajax form validation after bootstrap
AJAX request queue implementation
The above is the detailed content of A simple application based on Ajax form submission and background processing. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools
