This time I will bring you an analysis of the use of chain calls in JS design patterns. What are the precautions for using chain calls in JS design patterns? The following is a practical case. Let’s take a look.
Anyone who has written jquery may know that the following code can be easily used in jquery:
// 不使用链式调用 const element = $(ele); element.addClass('red'); element.removeClass('green'); element.show(); // 链式调用 $(ele) .addClass('red') .removeClass('green') .show();
The calling method of jquery is a chain call. We can see from the above code that if we do not use chain calls, we will add a lot of repeated code, and it will be particularly redundant. By chaining calls, we can save a lot of code, and the code looks more elegant and neat. So, next, let's discuss how to implement a library that supports chain calls.
Anyone who knows the prototype chain knows that the instance generated by the constructor can access the properties and methods of its prototype object. Therefore, we let the definition in the prototype object The method finally returns this (the instance in which the method is called), and the prototype method can be called in a chain.
// 通过立即执行函数,声明了一个_$函数,并且将一个$函数挂载到window上,并且每次调用$()的时候,返回的其实是个_$实例,由于原型对象方法里,执行最后都会返回一个this,因此就可以执行链式调用。 (function () { // 构造函数 function _$(selector) { // ... } _$.prototype = { addClass: function (className) { // ... return this; }, removeClass: function (className) { // ... return this; }, show: function () { // ... return this; } }; _$.prototype.constructor = _$; // 每次调用$()的时候,返回的其实是个_$实例 window.$ = function () { return new _$(arguments); } })(); // 通过这种方式,我们就可以直接使用$的链式调用 $(ele) .addClass('red') .removeClass('green') .show();
Of course, the above code can actually be optimized, because assuming that someone has already defined the $ function in the library you introduced, then you will face the problem of naming conflicts. So, we can add an installer for it
(function () { // 构造函数 function _$(selector) { // ... } _$.prototype = { addClass: function (className) { // ... return this; }, removeClass: function (className) { // ... return this; }, show: function () { // ... return this; } }; _$.prototype.constructor = _$; // 增加一个安装器 window.installHelper = function (scope, interface) { scope[interface] = function () { return new _$(arguments); } } })(); // 而用户就可以这样使用它来自定义挂载对象以及其命名 installHelper(window, '$'); $(ele).show();
Of course, sometimes chain calls are not a good idea. Chained calls are suitable for assignor methods, but are not very friendly for getter methods. Because sometimes we want the method to return some data instead of returning this. For this situation, there are two main solutions. One is to not return this for the value getter method, but to directly return the data. The other method is to process data through callback methods:
// 第一种方法,当遇到取值器,则直接返回数据 (function () { // 构造函数 function _$(selector) { this.ele = document.querySelector(selector); // ... } _$.prototype = { addClass: function (className) { // ... return this; }, // 取值器 getClass: function () { // ... return this.ele.className; } }; _$.prototype.constructor = _$; })(); // 第二种方式,通过回调的方式来处理数据 (function () { // 构造函数 function _$(selector) { this.ele = document.querySelector(selector); // ... } _$.prototype = { addClass: function (className) { // ... return this; }, getClass: function (cb) { // ... cb.call(this, this.ele.className); return this; } }; _$.prototype.constructor = _$; })();
Through chain calls, we can simplify our code and make it more concise and easier to read. And we only need to make all methods of the class return this value, so that the class can be transformed into a class that supports method chain calling. And if you want the valuer method to also support chained calls, you can use callbacks in the valuer to solve this problem.
I believe you have mastered the method after reading the case in this article. For more exciting information, please pay attention to other related articles on the php Chinese website!
Recommended reading:
vue jquery Lodash sliding top floating fixed function implementation details
##jQuery steps to implement the electronic clock function Detailed explanation
#Detailed explanation of Angular5 route parameter passing
The above is the detailed content of Analysis of chain calls in JS design patterns. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
