This article mainly analyzes the three major reasons for not using js anonymous functions. The function of anonymous functions is to avoid the pollution of global variables and conflict of function names. Please refer to this article for the three major reasons for js anonymous functions. I hope you can Help everyone.
The basic form of an anonymous function is (function(){...})();
The front brackets contain the function body, and the following brackets are to pass parameters to the anonymous function And execute it immediately
The role of anonymous functions is to avoid the pollution of global variables and conflict of function names
No matter when you read the code, you must pay attention to anonymous functions. Sometimes they are called lambdas, sometimes anonymous functions, either way I think they are difficult to use.
If you don’t know what an anonymous function is, here’s a quote:
An anonymous function is a function that is dynamically declared at runtime. They are called anonymous functions because unlike ordinary functions, they do not have function names. — Helen Emerson, Helenephant.com
The form of an anonymous function is as follows:
function () { ... code ... } OR (args) => { ... code .. }
I am trying to make everyone understand today the idea of generally only using anonymous functions when absolutely necessary. Anonymous functions should not be preferred and should be used only if the reasons are known. When you understand this idea, your code will become cleaner, easier to maintain, and easier to track bugs. Let’s start with three reasons to avoid using anonymous functions: When you write code, no matter how good you are at typing code, you will always encounter errors. Sometimes these errors are easy to detect, sometimes not.
If you know where these errors come from, then the errors can be easily detected. To find errors, we use this tool called a stack trace. If you don't know about stack traces, Google has a great introduction.
Suppose there is a very simple project now:
function start () { (function middle () { (function end () { console.lg('test'); })() })() }
There is a very stupid mistake in the above code, a spelling mistake (console.log). In a small project, this spelling error is not a big problem. If this is a small section of a very large project with many modules, the problem is huge. Assuming you didn't make this stupid mistake, the new junior engineer will commit it to the code base before he goes on vacation!
Now, we must track it down. Using our carefully named function, we get the following stack trace:
Thanks for naming your functions, junior developers! Now we can easily track down the bug.
But... once we solved this problem, we found that there was another bug. This time it was from a more senior developer. This person knows about lambdas
As a result they stumble upon a bug and it's our job to track it down.
The following is the code:
(function () { (function () { (function () { console.lg('test'); })(); })(); })();
Not surprisingly, this developer also forgot how to spell console.log! This is too much of a coincidence! It's a shame that none of them named their functions.
So what will the console output?
Well, we at least still have line numbers, right? In this example, it looks like we have about 7 lines of code. What happens if we deal with a large block of code? Like ten thousand lines of code? What should we do if the span of line numbers is so large? If there is a code map file after the code is folded, is the rendering of line numbers useless at all?
I think the answer to these questions is quite simple. The answer is: thinking about these things will make your whole day miserable.
Readability
Hey, I heard that you still don’t believe it. You're still attached to your anonymous function, and the bug has never occurred. Well I have to apologize to you for thinking your code is perfect. Let's take a look at this!
Look at the following two pieces of code:
function initiate (arguments) { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { try { if (arguments) { return resolve(true); } return resolve(false); } catch (e) { reject(e); } }); } initiate(true) .then(res => { if (res) { doSomethingElse(); } else { doSomething(); } ).catch(e => { logError(e.message); restartApp(); } );
This is a very abnormal example, but I believe you already understand what I am going to say. Our method returns a promise, and we use this promise object/method to handle different possible responses.
You may think that these few pieces of code are not difficult to read, but I think they can be better!
What would happen if we removed all anonymous functions?
function initiate (arguments) { return new Promise(checkForArguments); } function checkForArguments (resolve, reject) { try { if (arguments) { return resolve(true); } return resolve(false); } catch (e) { reject(e); } } function evaluateRes (res) { if (res) { doSomethingElse(); } else { doSomething(); } } function handleError (e) { logError(e.message); restartApp(); } initiate(true) .then(evaluateRes) .catch(handleError);
Okay, let’s be clear: this part of the code is longer, but I think it’s more than just more readable! Our carefully named functions are different from anonymous functions in that we know what their function is as soon as we see their name. This avoids obstacles when evaluating code.
This also helps to clarify the relationship. Instead of creating a method, passing it in, and then running the logic, in the second example the arguments are given to then and catch just points to the function where everything happens.
There’s nothing more I can say to you about being more readable. But maybe if you're not convinced yet, I can try one final argument.
Related recommendations:
The problem of setting anonymous functions for button loops in jsCommonly used anonymous functionsDetailed explanation of js anonymous function usage and parameter passing examplesThe above is the detailed content of Why not use JS anonymous functions. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools