


Detailed explanation of the differences between various js sorting methods and sort methods
I had a sudden thought today and wanted to know whether the sort method has advantages over various sortings. This article mainly shares with you the difference between various sorting methods and sort methods based on js (detailed explanation), which has a good reference value. I hope to be helpful. Let’s follow the editor to take a look, I hope it can help everyone.
nbsp;html> <meta> <meta> <title>图片列表生成交互组件</title> <style> * { margin: 0; border: 0; } html, body { height: 100%; } #p { height: 100%; width: 100%; } </style> <p></p> <script></script> <script> // ---------- 一些排序算法 Sort = { // 利用sort进行排序 systemSort:function(array){ return array.sort(function(a, b){ return a - b; }); }, // 冒泡排序 bubbleSort:function(array){ var i = 0, len = array.length, j, d; for(; i<len; i++){ for(j=0; j<len; j++){ if(array[i] < array[j]){ d = array[j]; array[j] = array[i]; array[i] = d; } } } return array; }, // 快速排序 quickSort:function(array){ //var array = [8,4,6,2,7,9,3,5,74,5]; //var array =[0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 0; var j = array.length - 1; var Sort = function(i, j){ // 结束条件 if(i == j ){ return }; var key = array[i]; var tempi = i; // 记录开始位置 var tempj = j; // 记录结束位置 while(j > i){ // j <<-------------- 向前查找 if(array[j] >= key){ j--; }else{ array[i] = array[j] //i++ ------------>>向后查找 while(j > ++i){ if(array[i] > key){ array[j] = array[i]; break; } } } } // 如果第一个取出的 key 是最小的数 if(tempi == i){ Sort(++i, tempj); return ; } // 最后一个空位留给 key array[i] = key; // 递归 Sort(tempi, i); Sort(j, tempj); } Sort(i, j); return array; }, // 插入排序 insertSort:function(array){ // http://baike.baidu.com/image/d57e99942da24e5dd21b7080 // http://baike.baidu.com/view/396887.htm // var array = [0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 1, j, temp, key, len = array.length; for(; i < len; i++){ temp = j = i; key = array[j]; while(--j > -1){ if(array[j] > key){ array[j+1] = array[j]; }else{ break; } } array[j+1] = key; } return array; }, // 希尔排序 shellSort:function(array){ // http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/%E5%B8%8C%E5%B0%94%E6%8E%92%E5%BA%8F // var array = [13,14,94,33,82,25,59,94,65,23,45,27,73,25,39,10]; // var tempArr = [1750, 701, 301, 132, 57, 23, 10, 4, 1]; // reverse() 在维基上看到这个最优的步长 较小数组 var tempArr = [1031612713, 217378076, 45806244, 9651787, 2034035, 428481, 90358, 19001, 4025, 836, 182, 34, 9, 1]; //针对大数组的步长选择 var i = 0; var tempArrLength = tempArr.length; var len = array.length; var len2 = parseInt(len/2); for(;i < tempArrLength; i++){ if(tempArr[i] > len2){ continue; } tempSort(tempArr[i]); } // 排序一个步长 function tempSort(temp){ //console.log(temp) 使用的步长统计 var i = 0, j = 0, f, tem, key; var tempLen = len%temp > 0 ? parseInt(len/temp) + 1 : len/temp; for(;i < temp; i++){// 依次循环列 for(j=1;/*j < tempLen && */temp * j + i < len; j++){ //依次循环每列的每行 tem = f = temp * j + i; key = array[f]; while((tem-=temp) >= 0){ // 依次向上查找 if(array[tem] > key){ array[tem+temp] = array[tem]; }else{ break; } } array[tem + temp ] = key; } } } return array; } }; testArrs = []; for (var i = 10000000; i > 0; i--) { testArrs.push(i); } function test(fun,arr) { console.log(arr); var oldTime = +new Date(); var new_arr = Sort[fun](arr); var newTime = +new Date(); console.log(new_arr); console.log(newTime-oldTime); } /* * sort排序 systemSort * 冒泡排序 bubbleSort * 快速排序 quickSort * 插入排序 insertSort * 希尔排序 shellSort * * */ test("systemSort",testArrs); </script>
The above method passes the test time, and then analyzes which sorting method saves time. Time is life. Using the correct method can save a lot of time, especially when big data is running.
First look at the time it takes to process an array of 10,000 lengths:
* sort sorting systemSort 11
* bubble sorting bubbleSort 169
* quick sorting quickSort 144
* Insertion sorting insertSort 139
* Hill sorting shellSort 3
Test 100,000-long array data:
* sort sorting systemSort 63
* Bubble sorting bubbleSort 16268
* Quick sort quickSort reports an error directly
* Insertion sort insertSort 13026
* Hill sort shellSort 8
Test an array with a length of one million:
* sort sorting systemSort 575
* Bubble sort bubbleSort time is unknown
* Quick sort quickSort reports an error directly
* Insertion sort insertSort crashes directly
* Hill sort shellSort 93
Test 10 million long Array:
* sort sorting systemSort 7039
* Bubble sort bubbleSort not tested
* quick sort quickSort not tested
* insertion sort insertSort not tested
* Hill sorting shellSort 1225
Testing an array of 100 million long:
* sort sorting systemSort crashes directly
* Bubble sort bubbleSort not tested
* Quick sort quickSort not tested
* Insertion sort insertSort Not tested
* Hill sorting shellSort 19864
Finally passed the test. In the worst case, it was found that Hill sorting is still the best, and it is even faster than the system sorting. It is really surprising. In this way, everyone can see what method needs to be used for sorting under what circumstances, right?
Then we test in random situations:
nbsp;html> <meta> <meta> <title>图片列表生成交互组件</title> <style> * { margin: 0; border: 0; } html, body { height: 100%; } #p { height: 100%; width: 100%; } </style> <p></p> <script></script> <script> // ---------- 一些排序算法 Sort = { // 利用sort进行排序 systemSort:function(array){ return array.sort(function(a, b){ return a - b; }); }, // 冒泡排序 bubbleSort:function(array){ var i = 0, len = array.length, j, d; for(; i<len; i++){ for(j=0; j<len; j++){ if(array[i] < array[j]){ d = array[j]; array[j] = array[i]; array[i] = d; } } } return array; }, // 快速排序 quickSort:function(array){ //var array = [8,4,6,2,7,9,3,5,74,5]; //var array =[0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 0; var j = array.length - 1; var Sort = function(i, j){ // 结束条件 if(i == j ){ return }; var key = array[i]; var tempi = i; // 记录开始位置 var tempj = j; // 记录结束位置 while(j > i){ // j <<-------------- 向前查找 if(array[j] >= key){ j--; }else{ array[i] = array[j] //i++ ------------>>向后查找 while(j > ++i){ if(array[i] > key){ array[j] = array[i]; break; } } } } // 如果第一个取出的 key 是最小的数 if(tempi == i){ Sort(++i, tempj); return ; } // 最后一个空位留给 key array[i] = key; // 递归 Sort(tempi, i); Sort(j, tempj); } Sort(i, j); return array; }, // 插入排序 insertSort:function(array){ // http://baike.baidu.com/image/d57e99942da24e5dd21b7080 // http://baike.baidu.com/view/396887.htm // var array = [0,1,2,44,4,324,5,65,6,6,34,4,5,6,2,43,5,6,62,43,5,1,4,51,56,76,7,7,2,1,45,4,6,7]; var i = 1, j, temp, key, len = array.length; for(; i < len; i++){ temp = j = i; key = array[j]; while(--j > -1){ if(array[j] > key){ array[j+1] = array[j]; }else{ break; } } array[j+1] = key; } return array; }, // 希尔排序 shellSort:function(array){ // http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/%E5%B8%8C%E5%B0%94%E6%8E%92%E5%BA%8F // var array = [13,14,94,33,82,25,59,94,65,23,45,27,73,25,39,10]; // var tempArr = [1750, 701, 301, 132, 57, 23, 10, 4, 1]; // reverse() 在维基上看到这个最优的步长 较小数组 var tempArr = [1031612713, 217378076, 45806244, 9651787, 2034035, 428481, 90358, 19001, 4025, 836, 182, 34, 9, 1]; //针对大数组的步长选择 var i = 0; var tempArrLength = tempArr.length; var len = array.length; var len2 = parseInt(len/2); for(;i < tempArrLength; i++){ if(tempArr[i] > len2){ continue; } tempSort(tempArr[i]); } // 排序一个步长 function tempSort(temp){ //console.log(temp) 使用的步长统计 var i = 0, j = 0, f, tem, key; var tempLen = len%temp > 0 ? parseInt(len/temp) + 1 : len/temp; for(;i < temp; i++){// 依次循环列 for(j=1;/*j < tempLen && */temp * j + i < len; j++){ //依次循环每列的每行 tem = f = temp * j + i; key = array[f]; while((tem-=temp) >= 0){ // 依次向上查找 if(array[tem] > key){ array[tem+temp] = array[tem]; }else{ break; } } array[tem + temp ] = key; } } } return array; } }; testArrs = []; for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testArrs.push(Math.random()); } function test(fun,arr) { var oldTime = +new Date(); var new_arr = Sort[fun](arr); var newTime = +new Date(); console.log(fun); console.log(newTime-oldTime); } /* * sort排序 systemSort * 冒泡排序 bubbleSort * 快速排序 quickSort * 插入排序 insertSort * 希尔排序 shellSort * * */ test("systemSort",testArrs); //test("bubbleSort",testArrs); //test("quickSort",testArrs); test("insertSort",testArrs); test("shellSort",testArrs); </script>
Test a 10 million-long array:
* sort sorting systemSort 8842
* Bubble sorting bubbleSort not tested
* quick sort quickSort not tested
* insertion sort insertSort 45
* Hill sorting shellSort 1133
In unknown situations and relatively good situations, insertion sort is most efficient
Related recommendations:
Summary of PHP array sorting method
Detailed explanation of the use of sorting methods in javascript algorithms
Introduction to php array functions and summary of array sorting methods
The above is the detailed content of Detailed explanation of the differences between various js sorting methods and sort methods. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment