search
HomeWeb Front-endJS TutorialPerformance issues with JavaScript loop statements

Performance issues with JavaScript loop statements

Feb 28, 2017 pm 02:18 PM
javascriptloop statementPerformance issues

In most programming languages, loop statements consume most of the time
And loop statements are a very important programming pattern

In our JavaScript, there are four types of loops

  1. for loop

  2. while loop

  3. do-while loop

  4. for-in loop

The first three loops are also very common in other languages
The for-in loop may be new to students who have studied C/C++ in school
It will Search instance and prototype properties, so it incurs more overhead per iteration
The for-in loop ends up being only 1/7 as fast as the other three types
So, unless we explicitly need to iterate over an unknown number of properties object, otherwise we should try to avoid using for-in
Don’t use for-in loops to traverse arrays

We can iterate a clear object like this

var props = [&#39;prop1&#39;, &#39;prop2&#39;],      i = 0;while(i < props.length){
    fn(obj[props[i++]]);
}

This code creates an array of object properties based on the properties in the object, and then uses a while loop to traverse the property list and process the corresponding property values ​​
This eliminates the need to search for each property of the object, reducing the number of loops Overhead

The premise of the above approach is that the properties inside the object are known
If we don’t know the internal implementation of the object
We still have to deal with the properties of the object itself, we can only do this

for(var prop in obj){    if(obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)){
        //...
    }
}

The cost is that each iteration has to determine whether the property is the object's own property rather than an inherited property

Except for-in, the performance of other loops is similar, so you should go to Consider the needs and choose the loop type


I believe that friends who have just learned programming are all familiar with writing loops

for(var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
    fn(arr[i]);
}

Every time this loop statement iterates, it must search arr length attribute, this is very time-consuming
So we can optimize,

for(var i = 0, len = arr.length; i < len; i++){
    fn(arr[i]);
}

Cache the array length value to a local variable, so the problem is solved
The same goes for while, do-while
Depending on the array length, this can save about 25% of running time in many browsers


We can also slightly improve performance by reversing the order of the array

for(var i = items.length; i--;){
    process(items[i]);
}
var j = items.length;while(j--){
    process(items[j]);
}
var k = items.length - 1;do {
    process(items[k]);
}while(k--);

Do this every time The iteration control condition is reduced from two judgments (whether the number of iterations is less than the total number, whether it is true) to one judgment (whether it is true), which further improves the loop speed


A few final words

We all may have used some array methods such as arr.forEach() or some framework iteration methods such as jQuery's $().each() to traverse the array.
These methods execute an Functions
Although they are convenient, they are much slower than ordinary loops (calling external methods)
In all cases, loop-based iteration is about 8 times faster than function-based iteration
Therefore, when we can use ordinary loops (for, while, do-while) to solve problems, we try to use these ordinary loops

The above is the content of the performance issues of JavaScript loop statements. For more related content, please pay attention to PHP Chinese Net (www.php.cn)!



Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Java vs JavaScript: A Detailed Comparison for DevelopersJava vs JavaScript: A Detailed Comparison for DevelopersMay 16, 2025 am 12:01 AM

JavaandJavaScriptaredistinctlanguages:Javaisusedforenterpriseandmobileapps,whileJavaScriptisforinteractivewebpages.1)Javaiscompiled,staticallytyped,andrunsonJVM.2)JavaScriptisinterpreted,dynamicallytyped,andrunsinbrowsersorNode.js.3)JavausesOOPwithcl

Javascript Data Types : Is there any difference between Browser and NodeJs?Javascript Data Types : Is there any difference between Browser and NodeJs?May 14, 2025 am 12:15 AM

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScript Comments: A Guide to Using // and /* */JavaScript Comments: A Guide to Using // and /* */May 13, 2025 pm 03:49 PM

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

Python vs. JavaScript: A Comparative Analysis for DevelopersPython vs. JavaScript: A Comparative Analysis for DevelopersMay 09, 2025 am 12:22 AM

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Python vs. JavaScript: Choosing the Right Tool for the JobPython vs. JavaScript: Choosing the Right Tool for the JobMay 08, 2025 am 12:10 AM

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript: Understanding the Strengths of EachPython and JavaScript: Understanding the Strengths of EachMay 06, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScript's Core: Is It Built on C or C  ?JavaScript's Core: Is It Built on C or C ?May 05, 2025 am 12:07 AM

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript Applications: From Front-End to Back-EndJavaScript Applications: From Front-End to Back-EndMay 04, 2025 am 12:12 AM

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 English version

SublimeText3 English version

Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

PhpStorm Mac version

PhpStorm Mac version

The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool