search
HomeWeb Front-endJS TutorialUrlencode encoding and decoding method under Javascript with decodeURIComponent

Regarding the encoding results of ASP (Server.UrlEncode), PHP (urlencode()) function, or the Chinese characters written directly into COOKIES through dynamic languages ​​such as asp and php, when reading with JS, you will encounter a The encoding problem is that the final string is encoded by urlencode, and it is sometimes necessary to read the data from JS on the client side.

This article will briefly talk about how to solve this problem in js through the system's own functions.

I believe that friends who have encountered this problem should know something about it. Currently, some custom functions under js are popular on the Internet to solve this problem, such as vbscript (URLDecode()), javascript (UrlDecode() ))wait. Neither of these two functions can communicate well with each other asp (Server.UrlEncode) and php (urlencode()).
About vbscript (function URLDecode()) and javascript (function UrlDecode()) will also be reproduced at the end of this article.

The protagonist of this article is javascript (UrlDecodedecodeURIComponent()). This function name is so common that I personally don’t really understand it. After all, there are many system functions in js and it is easy to miss it. Worry discovered this function by accident!

Encoding function: encodeURIComponent()
Decoding function: decodeURIComponent()
decodeURIComponent() syntax

decodeURIComponent(URIstring) 
参 数:(URIstring)必需。一个字符串,含有编码 URI 组件或其他要解码的文本。 
返回值:URIstring 的副本,其中的十六进制转义序列将被它们表示的字符替换。

Example:

<script type="text/javascript"> 
var test1="烦恼"; 
var test2="%E7%83%A6%E6%81%BC"; 
document.write("编码(原="+test1+"):"+encodeURIComponent(test1)+ "<br />"); 
document.write("解码(原="+test2+"):"+decodeURIComponent(test2)); 
</script>

Result:

编码(原=烦恼):%E7%83%A6%E6%81%BC 
解码(原=%E7%83%A6%E6%81%BC):烦恼

Note: This article is only tested in UTF-8 encoding environment. Because in different encoding environments, the compiled code of asp (Server.UrlEncode) seems to be different and needs to be tested!
Attached reprint:
vbscript (function URLDecode())

<script type="text/VBscript"> 
<!-- 
Function URLDecode(enStr) 
    dim deStr,strSpecial 
    dim c,i,v 
    deStr="" 
    strSpecial="!""#$%&&#39;()*+,.-_/:;<=>?@[\]^`{|}~%" 
    for i=1 to len(enStr) 
        c=Mid(enStr,i,1) 
        if c="%" then 
            v=eval("&h"+Mid(enStr,i+1,2)) 
            if inStr(strSpecial,chr(v))>0 then 
            deStr=deStr&chr(v) 
            i=i+2 
            else 
            v=eval("&h"+ Mid(enStr,i+1,2) + Mid(enStr,i+4,2)) 
            deStr=deStr & chr(v) 
            i=i+5 
            end if 
        else 
            if c="+" then 
            deStr=deStr&" " 
            else 
            deStr=deStr&c 
            end if 
        end if 
    next 
    URLDecode=deStr 
End function 
//--> 
</script>

javascript (function UrlDecode()) actually uses vbscript softly. It seems that in the javascript environment, for asc, hex, chr related Conversion, such as str.charCodeAt(0).toString(16) and String.fromCharCode(str). Under different encodings, the encoding results for Chinese are not uniform.
For example: vbscript str2asc/asc2str

<script type="text/vbscript"> 
Function str2asc(strstr) 
str2asc = hex(asc(strstr)) 
End Function 
Function asc2str(ascasc) 
asc2str = chr(ascasc) 
End Function 
MsgBox str2asc("a") 
MsgBox asc2str("&H61")&#39;16进制转的61 转到 10进制就是 97 
</script>

javascript str2asc/asc2str

<script type="text/javascript"> 
function str2asc(str){ 
return str.charCodeAt(0).toString(16); 
} 
function asc2str(str){ 
return String.fromCharCode(str); 
} 
alert(str2asc("a"));// 
alert(asc2str("0x61"));// 
</script>

Demonstration:

<script type="text/vbscript"> 
            Function str2asc(strstr) 
            str2asc = hex(asc(strstr)) 
            End Function 
            Function asc2str(ascasc) 
            asc2str = chr(ascasc) 
            End Function 
</script> 
<script type="text/javascript"> 
    /*这里开始时UrlEncode和UrlDecode<a href="/?tag=%E5%87%BD%E6%95%B0" target="_blank">函数</a>*/ 
    function UrlEncode(str){ 
        var ret=""; 
        var strSpecial="!\"#$%&&#39;()*+,/:;<=>?[]^`{|}~%"; 
        var tt= ""; 
        for(var i=0;i<str.length;i++){ 
        var chr = str.charAt(i); 
        var c=str2asc(chr); 
        tt += chr+":"+c+"n"; 
        if(parseInt("0x"+c) > 0x7f){ 
        ret+="%"+c.slice(0,2)+"%"+c.slice(-2); 
        }else{ 
        if(chr==" ") 
        ret+="+"; 
        else if(strSpecial.indexOf(chr)!=-1) 
        ret+="%"+c.toString(16); 
        else 
        ret+=chr; 
        } 
        } 
        return ret; 
    } 
    function UrlDecode(str){ 
        var ret=""; 
        for(var i=0;i<str.length;i++){ 
        var chr = str.charAt(i); 
        if(chr == "+"){ 
        ret+=" "; 
        }else if(chr=="%"){ 
        var asc = str.substring(i+1,i+3); 
        if(parseInt("0x"+asc)>0x7f){ 
        ret+=asc2str(parseInt("0x"+asc+str.substring(i+4,i+6))); 
        i+=5; 
        }else{ 
        ret+=asc2str(parseInt("0x"+asc)); 
        i+=2; 
        } 
        }else{ 
        ret+= chr; 
        } 
        } 
        return ret; 
    } 
    alert(UrlDecode("%C2%D2%C2%EB")); 
</script>

For more urlencode encoding and decoding methods under Javascript, please attach decodeURIComponent related articles. Follow PHP Chinese website!

Statement
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Javascript Data Types : Is there any difference between Browser and NodeJs?Javascript Data Types : Is there any difference between Browser and NodeJs?May 14, 2025 am 12:15 AM

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScript Comments: A Guide to Using // and /* */JavaScript Comments: A Guide to Using // and /* */May 13, 2025 pm 03:49 PM

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

Python vs. JavaScript: A Comparative Analysis for DevelopersPython vs. JavaScript: A Comparative Analysis for DevelopersMay 09, 2025 am 12:22 AM

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Python vs. JavaScript: Choosing the Right Tool for the JobPython vs. JavaScript: Choosing the Right Tool for the JobMay 08, 2025 am 12:10 AM

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript: Understanding the Strengths of EachPython and JavaScript: Understanding the Strengths of EachMay 06, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScript's Core: Is It Built on C or C  ?JavaScript's Core: Is It Built on C or C ?May 05, 2025 am 12:07 AM

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript Applications: From Front-End to Back-EndJavaScript Applications: From Front-End to Back-EndMay 04, 2025 am 12:12 AM

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Python vs. JavaScript: Which Language Should You Learn?Python vs. JavaScript: Which Language Should You Learn?May 03, 2025 am 12:10 AM

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.

See all articles

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

mPDF

mPDF

mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

WebStorm Mac version

WebStorm Mac version

Useful JavaScript development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version

Dreamweaver Mac version

Visual web development tools