PHP study notes operator priority_PHP tutorial

Operator priority is an important knowledge point that a programmer must understand and master. Let’s take a look at the PHP operator priority article.

I saw a question in Lao Wang’s technical manual today:

代码如下	复制代码

What is the output?

This question may seem simple at first glance, but in fact it is not simple if you think about it carefully.

If we say Boolean and the previous part, it is due to a priority issue, but if it is just a priority issue, then the result should be:

代码如下	复制代码
$a = (100 && $b) = 200

The actual result is that the high-priority && is indeed given up to the low-priority =, so that $b = 200 is combined first.

The reason is that PHP does not fully comply with the definition of priority. This is also explained in the PHP manual:

Note: Although = has a lower precedence than most other operators, PHP will still allow expressions similar to the following: if (!$a = foo()), in which case the return value of foo() is put into $a.

I don’t personally express my opinion on such a design. Anyway, in C language, similar statements like this are judged to be grammatically incorrect. PHP adopts such a design, probably for historical reasons,

Curious students may want to know why. Netizen jayeeliu also asked before:

Hello laruence:

Ask a question about PHP operator priority

The code is as follows

Copy code

代码如下	复制代码
$t == 1 && $tt = 2

$t == 1 && $tt = 2

According to php operator priority should be

代码如下	复制代码
(($t == 1) && $tt) = 2

The code is as follows	Copy code
(($t == 1) && $tt) = 2

代码如下	复制代码
($t == 1) && ($tt = 2)

This order is executed, but it should actually be

The code is as follows	Copy code
($t == 1) && ($tt = 2)

I don’t quite understand.

代码如下	复制代码
expr_without_variable:  // 有隐规则存在, 相当于T_BOOLEAN_AND成为了"一元操作符".  |   expr T_BOOLEAN_AND  { zend_do_boolean_and_begin(&, & TSRMLS_CC); } exp

In fact, it is also simple. Operator priority is a means of selecting rules when there is an ambiguous grammar. However, in the definition of PHP's syntax analysis file, the equal sign and T_BOOLEAN_AND(&&) do not exist before Found a protocol conflict:

The code is as follows	Copy code
expr_without_variable: // There are implicit rules, which is equivalent to T_BOOLEAN_AND becoming a "unary operator". | expr T_BOOLEAN_AND { zend_do_boolean_and_begin(&$1, &$2 TSRMLS_CC); } exp

Finally, by the way, PHP corresponds to T_BOOLEAN_AND and also defines T_LOGICAL_AND(and) and T_LOGICAL_OR(or). The priority of both of these is lower than the equal sign, so there will be many sample codes for PHP introductory textbooks. Classic:

The code is as follows

Copy code

代码如下	复制代码
$result = mysql_query(*)  or die(mysql_error());

$result = mysql_query(*) or die(mysql_error());

Similarly, you can also use or to implement the function of the ternary operator (?:):

代码如下	复制代码
$person = $who or $person = "laruence";

The code is as follows	Copy code
$person = $who or $person = "laruence";

代码如下	复制代码
$person = empty($who)? "laruence" : $who;

//Equivalent to:

The code is as follows	Copy code
$person = empty($who)? "laruence" : $who;

结合方向	运算符
左	,
左	or
左	xor
左	and
右	print
右	= += -= *= /= .= %= &= |= ^= ~= >=
左	? :
左	||
左	&&
左	|
左	^
左	&
无	== != === !==
无	>=
左	>
左	+ - .
左	* / %
右	! ~ ++ -- (int) (float) (string) (array) (object) @
右	[
无	new

结合方向

运算符

左

,

左

or

左 xor 左 and 右 print 右 = += -= *= /= .= %= &= |= ^= ~= >= 左 ? :

左 || 左 && 左 | 左 ^ 左 & 无 == != === !== 无 >= 左 > 左 + - . 左 * / % 右 ! ~ ++ -- (int) (float) (string) (array) (object) @ 右 [ 无 new http://www.bkjia.com/PHPjc/632626.htmlwww.bkjia.comtruehttp://www.bkjia.com/PHPjc/632626.htmlTechArticle运算符优先级是一个程序员必须了解并且撑握的一个重要的知识点了，下面我们一起来看看PHP运算符优先级文章吧。 今天在老王的技术手册...