Home >Backend Development >PHP Tutorial >Analysis of file locks, mutex locks, and read-write lock usage techniques in PHP programs, _PHP tutorial
File locks
The full name is advisory file lock, which is mentioned in the book. This type of lock is relatively common. For example, after mysql and php-fpm are started, there will be a pid file recording the process ID. This file is the file lock.
This lock can prevent a process from running repeatedly. For example, when using crontab, one task is limited to be executed every minute, but this process may run for more than one minute. If the process lock is not used to resolve the conflict, the two processes will be executed together. There is a problem.
Another benefit of using PID file lock is that it is convenient for the process to send stop or restart signals to itself. For example, the command to restart php-fpm is
kill -USR2 `cat /usr/local/php/var/run/php-fpm.pid`
Send the USR2 signal to the process recorded in the pid file. The signal belongs to process communication and will be discussed in another chapter.
The interface of PHP is flock, and the documentation is relatively detailed. Let’s take a look at the definition first, bool flock ( resource $handle , int $operation [, int &$wouldblock ] ).
It should be noted that this function is blocking by default. If you want to be non-blocking, you can add a bitmask LOCK_NB to the operation. Next, test it.
$pid_file = "/tmp/process.pid"; $pid = posix_getpid(); $fp = fopen($pid_file, 'w+'); if(flock($fp, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB)){ echo "got the lock \n"; ftruncate($fp, 0); // truncate file fwrite($fp, $pid); fflush($fp); // flush output before releasing the lock sleep(300); // long running process flock($fp, LOCK_UN); // 释放锁定 } else { echo "Cannot get pid lock. The process is already up \n"; } fclose($fp);
Save it as process.php, run php process.php &, then run php process.php again and you will see the error message. flock also has a shared lock, LOCK_SH.
Mutex locks and read-write locks
Mutex in sync module:
Mutex is a compound word, mutual exclusion. Use pecl to install the sync module, pecl install sync. The SyncMutex in the document only has two methods, lock and unlock. Let’s go directly to the code test. I didn't write it in IDE, so the cs is extremely ugly, please ignore it.
$mutex = new SyncMutex("UniqueName"); for($i=0; $i<2; $i++){ $pid = pcntl_fork(); if($pid <0){ die("fork failed"); }elseif ($pid>0){ echo "parent process \n"; }else{ echo "child process {$i} is born. \n"; obtainLock($mutex, $i); } } while (pcntl_waitpid(0, $status) != -1) { $status = pcntl_wexitstatus($status); echo "Child $status completed\n"; } function obtainLock ($mutex, $i){ echo "process {$i} is getting the mutex \n"; $res = $mutex->lock(200); sleep(1); if (!$res){ echo "process {$i} unable to lock mutex. \n"; }else{ echo "process {$i} successfully got the mutex \n"; $mutex->unlock(); } exit(); }
Save as mutex.php, run php mutex.php, output is
parent process parent process child process 1 is born. process 1 is getting the mutex child process 0 is born. process 0 is getting the mutex process 1 successfully got the mutex Child 0 completed process 0 unable to lock mutex. Child 0 completed
Here sub-processes 0 and 1 are not necessarily in front. But there is always one who cannot get the lock. The parameter of SyncMutex::lock(int $millisecond) here is millisecond, which represents the blocking duration, and -1 means infinite blocking.
Read-write lock in sync module:
The method of SyncReaderWriter is similar, readlock, readunlock, writelock, writeunlock, just appear in pairs. There is no test code written, it should be consistent with the Mutex code, just replace the lock.
Event in sync module:
It feels more like Cond in golang, wait() blocks, and fire() wakes up a process blocked by Event. There is a good article introducing Cond. It can be seen that Cond is a fixed usage of locks. The same goes for SyncEvent.
The examples in the PHP documentation show that the fire() method seems to be used in web applications.
Test code
for($i=0; $i<3; $i++){ $pid = pcntl_fork(); if($pid <0){ die("fork failed"); }elseif ($pid>0){ //echo "parent process \n"; }else{ echo "child process {$i} is born. \n"; switch ($i) { case 0: wait(); break; case 1: wait(); break; case 2: sleep(1); fire(); break; } } } while (pcntl_waitpid(0, $status) != -1) { $status = pcntl_wexitstatus($status); echo "Child $status completed\n"; } function wait(){ $event = new SyncEvent("UniqueName"); echo "before waiting. \n"; $event->wait(); echo "after waiting. \n"; exit(); } function fire(){ $event = new SyncEvent("UniqueName"); $event->fire(); exit(); }
One fire() is deliberately written here, so the program will block, which proves that fire() only wakes up one process at a time.
pthreads module
Lock and unlock mutex:
Function:
pthread_mutex_lock (mutex) pthread_mutex_trylock (mutex) pthread_mutex_unlock (mutex)
Usage:
The thread uses the pthread_mutex_lock() function to lock the specified mutex variable. If the mutex is already locked by another thread, this call will block the thread until the mutex is unlocked.
pthread_mutex_trylock() will attempt to lock a mutex. However, if the mutex is already locked, the routine will return immediately with a "busy" error code. This routine may be useful in pthread_mutex_trylock().
Attempt to lock a mutex. However, if the mutex is already locked, the program will immediately return with a busy error value. This function is useful to prevent deadlock in the case of priority changes. A thread can use pthread_mutex_unlock() to unlock the mutex it occupies. This function can be called when one thread completes the use of protected data and other threads want to obtain a mutex to work on the protected data. An error will occur if the following situation occurs:
There is nothing "magical" about mutexes. In fact, they are the "gentleman's agreement" of the participating threads. When writing code, be sure to lock and unlock mutexes correctly.
Q: There are multiple threads waiting for the same locked mutex. When the mutex is unlocked, which thread will be the first to lock the mutex?
A: Unless the thread uses the priority scheduling mechanism, the thread will be allocated by the system scheduler, and the thread that will lock the mutex first is random.
#include<stdlib.h> #include<stdio.h> #include<unistd.h> #include<pthread.h> typedef struct ct_sum { int sum; pthread_mutex_t lock; }ct_sum; void * add1(void *cnt) { pthread_mutex_lock(&(((ct_sum*)cnt)->lock)); for(int i=0; i < 50; i++) { (*(ct_sum*)cnt).sum += i; } pthread_mutex_unlock(&(((ct_sum*)cnt)->lock)); pthread_exit(NULL); return 0; } void * add2(void *cnt) { pthread_mutex_lock(&(((ct_sum*)cnt)->lock)); for(int i=50; i<101; i++) { (*(ct_sum*)cnt).sum += i; } pthread_mutex_unlock(&(((ct_sum*)cnt)->lock)); pthread_exit(NULL); return 0; } int main(void) { pthread_t ptid1, ptid2; ct_sum cnt; pthread_mutex_init(&(cnt.lock), NULL); cnt.sum=0; pthread_create(&ptid1, NULL, add1, &cnt); pthread_create(&ptid2, NULL, add2, &cnt); pthread_join(ptid1,NULL); pthread_join(ptid2,NULL); printf("sum %d\n", cnt.sum); pthread_mutex_destroy(&(cnt.lock)); return 0; }
Semaphore
Semaphore in sync module:
The SyncSemaphore document shows that the difference between it and Mutex is that Semaphore can be obtained by multiple processes (or threads) at a time, while Mutex can only be obtained by one at a time. So in the constructor of SyncSemaphore, there is a parameter that specifies how many processes the semaphore can be obtained by.
public SyncSemaphore::__construct ([ string $name [, integer $initialval [, bool $autounlock ]]] ) is this $initialval (initial value)
$lock = new SyncSemaphore("UniqueName", 2); for($i=0; $i<2; $i++){ $pid = pcntl_fork(); if($pid <0){ die("fork failed"); }elseif ($pid>0){ echo "parent process \n"; }else{ echo "child process {$i} is born. \n"; obtainLock($lock, $i); } } while (pcntl_waitpid(0, $status) != -1) { $status = pcntl_wexitstatus($status); echo "Child $status completed\n"; } function obtainLock ($lock, $i){ echo "process {$i} is getting the lock \n"; $res = $lock->lock(200); sleep(1); if (!$res){ echo "process {$i} unable to lock lock. \n"; }else{ echo "process {$i} successfully got the lock \n"; $lock->unlock(); } exit(); }
At this time both processes can get the lock.
$key = ftok('/tmp', 'c'); $sem = sem_get($key); for($i=0; $i<2; $i++){ $pid = pcntl_fork(); if($pid <0){ die("fork failed"); }elseif ($pid>0){ //echo "parent process \n"; }else{ echo "child process {$i} is born. \n"; obtainLock($sem, $i); } } while (pcntl_waitpid(0, $status) != -1) { $status = pcntl_wexitstatus($status); echo "Child $status completed\n"; } sem_remove($sem); // finally remove the sem function obtainLock ($sem, $i){ echo "process {$i} is getting the sem \n"; $res = sem_acquire($sem, true); sleep(1); if (!$res){ echo "process {$i} unable to get sem. \n"; }else{ echo "process {$i} successfully got the sem \n"; sem_release($sem); } exit(); }
这里有一个问题,sem_acquire()第二个参数$nowait默认为false,阻塞。我设为了true,如果得到锁失败,那么后面的sem_release会报警告 PHP Warning: sem_release(): SysV semaphore 4 (key 0x63000081) is not currently acquired in /home/jason/sysvsem.php on line 33, 所以这里的release操作必须放在得到锁的情况下执行,前面的几个例子中没有这个问题,没得到锁执行release也不会报错。当然最好还是成对出现,确保得到锁的情况下再release。
此外,ftok这个方法的参数有必要说明下,第一个 必须是existing, accessable的文件, 一般使用项目中的文件,第二个是单字符字符串。返回一个int。
输出为
parent process parent process child process 1 is born. process 1 is getting the mutex child process 0 is born. process 0 is getting the mutex process 1 successfully got the mutex Child 0 completed process 0 unable to lock mutex. Child 0 completed