


Briefly talk about the implicit binding of this in JavaScript_Basic knowledge
Let’s look at an example first
function foo() { console.log( this.a ); } var obj = { a: 2, foo: foo }; obj.foo(); // 2
This points to obj, because the call-site when foo is executed (can be understood as the scope when calling) is above obj. Note that it is at runtime and has nothing to do with where it is declared.
call-site and call-stack
Call-site is temporarily understood as the call domain, and call-stack is the call stack. The following code can help us understand
function baz() { // call-stack is: `baz` // so, our call-site is in the global scope console.log( "baz" ); bar(); // <-- call-site for `bar` }
Call bar() in baz(), so the calling domain of bar is baz. At this time, the call stack of bar is only baz; and baz itself is exposed in the global scope, so its calling domain also affects the global scope. in the domain.
function bar() { // call-stack is: `baz` -> `bar` // so, our call-site is in `baz` console.log( "bar" ); foo(); // <-- call-site for `foo` } function foo() { // call-stack is: `baz` -> `bar` -> `foo` // so, our call-site is in `bar` console.log( "foo" ); } baz(); // <-- call-site for `baz`
After understanding it, look back at the example at the beginning and it will become much clearer. In fact, this just points to its call-site
There are also ways to play as follows:
function foo() { console.log( this.a ); } var obj2 = { a: 42, foo: foo }; var obj1 = { a: 2, obj2: obj2 }; obj1.obj2.foo(); // 42 Implicitly Lost(隐式丢失) function foo() { console.log( this.a ); } var obj = { a: 2, foo: foo }; var bar = obj.foo; // function reference/alias! var a = "oops, global"; // `a` also property on global object bar(); // "oops, global"
Although bar refers to foo on obj, it is actually equivalent to directly referencing foo, so it will be bound to the global by default.
function foo() { console.log( this.a ); } function doFoo(fn) { // `fn` is just another reference to `foo` fn(); // <-- call-site! } var obj = { a: 2, foo: foo }; var a = "oops, global"; // `a` also property on global object doFoo( obj.foo ); // "oops, global"

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor
