


JavaScript uses window.name to solve cross-domain problems Page 1/2_javascript skills
window.name transmission technology was originally developed by Thomas Frank to solve some disadvantages of cookies (limit of 4 x 20 Kb per domain name, data can only be strings, Invented due to the complexity of setting and obtaining cookie syntax, etc.) (see the original text for details: 《Session variables without cookies》), and later Kris Zyp Based on this method, window.name transmission is enhanced and introduced to Dojo (dojox.io.windowName ), used to solve cross-domain data transmission problems. The basic principles and steps of
window.name transmission technology are:
name is an attribute of the global/window object in the browser environment, and when a new page is loaded in the frame, the attribute value of name remains unchanged. Change. By loading a resource within an iframe, the target page will set the frame's name attribute. This name attribute value can be obtained to access the information sent by the web service. But the name attribute is only accessible to frames with the same domain name. This means that in order to access the name attribute, when the remote web service page is loaded, the frame must be navigated back to the original domain. The same-origin policy still prevents other frames from accessing the name attribute. Once the name property is obtained, destroy the frame.
At the top level, the name attribute is unsafe, and any information set in the name attribute is available to all subsequent pages. However, the windowName module always loads resources in an iframe, and once the data is obtained, or when you browse a new page at the top level, the iframe will be destroyed, so other pages can never access the window.name property.
Basic implementation code, based on YUI, derived from the sample written by Ke Jun:
Copy code The code is as follows :
(function(){
var YUD = YAHOO.util.Dom, YUE = YAHOO.util.Event;
dataRequest = {
_doc: document ,
cfg: {
proxyUrl: 'proxy.html'
}
};
dataRequest.send = function(sUrl, fnCallBack){
if(!sUrl || typeof sUrl !== 'string'){
return;
}
sUrl = (sUrl.indexOf('?') > 0 ? '&' : '?') 'windowname=true';
var frame = this._doc.createElement('iframe'), state = 0, self = this;
this._doc.body.appendChild(frame);
frame.style.display = 'none';
var clear = function(){
try{
frame.contentWindow.document.write('');
frame.contentWindow .close();
self._doc.body.removeChild(frame);
}catch(e){}
};
var getData = function(){
try{
var da = frame.contentWindow.name;
}catch(e){}
clear();
if(fnCallBack && typeof fnCallBack === 'function'){
fnCallBack(da);
}
};
YUE.on(frame, 'load', function(){
if(state === 1){
getData();
} else if(state === 0){
state = 1;
frame.contentWindow.location = self.cfg.proxyUrl;
}
});
frame.src = sUrl;
};
})();

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software
