Clear web page history and block the back button!_javascript tips
This article introduces various solutions for disabling the browser back button that can be found on the Internet, and analyzes their respective advantages, disadvantages and applicable occasions.
1. Overview
Many people have asked, "How can I 'disable' the browser's back button?", or "How can I prevent users from clicking the back button to return to previously visited pages?" "This question is also one of the most frequently asked questions on the ASP forum. Unfortunately, the answer is very simple: we can't disable the browser's back
button.
At first I was incredulous that someone would want to disable the browser’s back button. Later, I was relieved to see that so many people wanted to disable the back button
(the only ones they wanted to disable were the back button, not the browser's forward button). Because by default, after submitting the form, the user can return to the form page through the
back button (instead of using the "Edit" button!), and then edit and submit the form again to insert new records into the database. This is something we
don’t want to see.
So I decided to find a way to avoid this situation. I visited many websites and consulted various implementation methods introduced by these websites. If you
frequently visit ASP programming websites, you may have seen some of the content introduced in this article. The task of this article is to introduce all possible methods to everyone, and then find
the best method!
2. Disable caching
Among the many solutions I found, one of them suggested disabling page caching. Specifically, use a server-side script as follows:
Response.ExpiresAbsolute = Now() - 1
Response.Expires = 0
Response.CacheControl = "no-cache"
%>
This method is very effective! It forces the browser to revisit the server to download the page instead of reading the page from cache. When using this method, the programmer's main task is to create a session-level variable that determines whether the user can still view the page that is not suitable for access via the back button. Since the browser
the user should be allowed to open the page.
For example, suppose we have the following form:
Response.Expires = 0
Response.CacheControl = "no-cache"
If Len(Session( "FirstTimeToPage")) > 0 then
&single; The user has visited the current page and is now returning to visit again.
&single; Clear session variables and redirect the user to the login page.
Session("FirstTimeToPage") = ""
Response.Redirect "/Bar.asp"
Response.End
End If
&single; If the program runs here, it means that the user can view Current page
&single; The following starts creating the form
%>
code:
Session("FirstTimeToPage") = "NO"
In this way, if the user who has opened SomePage.asp clicks the back button, the browser The server will be re-requested to download the page. The server checks that Session
("FirstTimeToPage") contains a value, so it clears Session("FirstTimeToPage") and redirects the user to other pages. Of course,
all of this requires the user to have cookies enabled, otherwise the session variables will be invalid. (For more explanation of this problem, see For session variables
to work, must the Web visitor have cookies enabled?)
In addition, we can also use client-side code to prevent the browser from caching Web pages:
If you use the above method to force the browser to no longer cache web pages, you must pay attention to the following points:
"Pragma: no-cache" only prevents the browser from caching the page when using a secure connection. For pages that are not protected by security, "Pragma: no-cache"
is treated the same as "Expires: -1". At this time, the browser still caches the page, but marks the page as expiring immediately.
In IE 4 or 5, the "Cache-Control" META HTTP-EQUIV tag is ignored and has no effect.
In practical applications we can add all these codes. However, since this method does not work in all browsers, it is not recommended. But
If it is an intranet environment and the administrator can control which browser the user uses, I think some people will still use this method.
3. Other methods
The method we are going to discuss next is centered on the back button itself, rather than the browser cache. Here is an article Rewiring the Back Button that is
worth referencing. However, I noticed that if this method is used, although the user will not see the page where he previously entered data when he clicks the back button, he only needs to click
twice. This is not the effect we want, because Many times, stubborn users are able to find ways to bypass preventive measures.
Another way to disable the back button is to use client-side JavaScript to open a window without a toolbar. This makes it difficult for the user to return to the previous page, but
not impossible. A safer, but rather annoying, method is to open a new window when the form is submitted and at the same time close the window where the form is located. But I feel
that this method is not worthy of serious consideration, because we can’t let users open a new window every time they submit a form.
So, can we add JavaScript code to the page that we don’t want users to return to? The JavaScript code added to this page can
be used to produce the effect of clicking the forward button, thus counteracting the action caused by the user clicking the back button. The JavaScript code used to implement this function is as follows
:
Again, although this method works, it is far from the "best method". Later, I saw someone suggesting using location.replace to move from one
page to another. The principle of this method is to replace the current history record with the URL of the new page, so that there is only one page in the browsing history, and the
back button never becomes available. I think this is probably what many people are looking for, but it's still not the best approach in every situation. An example of using this
method is as follows:
Disable links back to this page
Try this link:
Disable links back to this page!
The disadvantage of this approach is that simply using Response.Redirect will no longer work because every time the user goes from one page to another,
we have to clear location.history with client code . Also note that this method clears the last access history record, not all
access records.
Click the link above and you will open a simple HTML page. Click the back button again, and you can see that what is opened is not this page, but the page
before this page! (Of course, you must enable client-side JavaScript code in the browser.)
After some careful searching, I found that I still couldn’t find a way to completely disable the browser’s back button. All of the methods
described here can prevent users from returning to the previous page to varying degrees and in different ways, but they all have their own limitations. Since there is no way to completely disable the back button
, the best solution is to use a mix of client-side and server-side scripts.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft