


About the response level of javascript bubbling events under IE browser and Firefox_javascript skills
Suppose there is such a tag on our page:
Now add this script to the page:
< ;script type="text/javascript">
window.onload=function(){ //Bind events on elements at each level
window.onclick=func;
document. onclick=func;
document.getElementById("timeDiv").onclick=func;
document.body.onclick=func;
}
function func(){ //Response function, output response The element
document.getElementById("timeDiv").innerHTML =this "
";
}
Open the page under firefox and IE 8, in the tag testDiv ( Click on the gray square), and the results are as follows:
Results under firefox
Results of IE 8
As you can see, the results of the two are not the same? Why exactly is this happening?
It turns out that this is caused by the different levels of support for bubbling events in IE and Firefox. (If you don’t know much about bubbling events, you can check the relevant information first)
(1) In IE 6 and subsequent versions, the level supported by bubbling events reaches the document object.
(2) In Firefox (Mozilla 1.0 and later to be precise), support for bubbling events has been extended to the window object.
As a result, the above event response results are different.
Also, there is something interesting, have you noticed it? It is the response sequence of event targets. (The response sequence of bubbling events... seems a bit nonsense) We know that Firefox supports two event models at the same time, namely: capturing events and bubbling events. Here it is obvious that the event processing function acts in the bubbling stage. That is to say, if we use the traditional method of directly assigning values to event handler function attributes, for example:
document.body.onclick=func;
The event handler will be added to the bubbling phase of the event.
The above is an introduction to the bubbling event response level in IE and Firefox. At the same time, it also introduces the default processing of direct assignment of traditional event processing functions. For detailed explanation, please refer to "Javascript Advanced Programming" written by Nicholas C. Zakas.
PS: The above content is only personal reading notes. If there are any errors or omissions, please feel free to correct me. At the same time, I hope that more front-end enthusiasts can share your experiences!

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools