


Detailed explanation of the problem of sending AJAX requests in JavaScript for loop_jquery
First of all, it is rare that this problem occurs because there are too many better solutions. When doing ajax today, an interesting thing is that a get request must be sent in each iteration. Because the iteration speed is too fast, the next iteration will be carried out before a request is completed. On chrome and ff, except for the last one Except for the request, all other requests have been cancelled. So what to do? Set a delay (not so good) or some other way?
There are many ways, such as setting sleep, iteration, etc. I use two other solutions.
1. Synchronous ajax request , and ajax request is asynchronous by default, so it should be set to false.
function creatXMLHttpRequest() { var xmlHttp; if (window.ActiveXObject) { return xmlHttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } else if (window.XMLHttpRequest) { return xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); } } function disButton(name, actionName, resquestParmName) { var path = document.getElementById("path").value; var xmlHttp = creatXMLHttpRequest(); var invoiceIds = new Array(); invoiceIds = document.getElementsByName(name); // 迭代的速度快于发送请求+收到回复的时间 所以一次get请求都还没有完成就进行了下一次请求 for (i = 0; i < invoiceIds.length; i++) { var invoiceId = invoiceIds[i].value; var url = path + "/" + actionName + ".action?" + resquestParmName + "=" + invoiceId; xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function() { if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4) { if (xmlHttp.status == 200) { var result = xmlHttp.responseText; if (result == "0") { document.getElementById("btn" + invoiceId).disabled = "disabled"; } } } } xmlHttp.open("GET", url, false); xmlHttp.send(null); } }
In this way, using synchronous ajax request, you will wait for the server to respond, execute the code, and then continue to iterate. But it seems that this is not recommended.
2. Use an asynchronous method , but remember that a new XMLHttpRequest object must be created for each iteration and cannot be reused.
function creatXMLHttpRequest() { var xmlHttp; if (window.ActiveXObject) { return xmlHttp = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } else if (window.XMLHttpRequest) { return xmlHttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); } } function disButton(name, actionName, resquestParmName) { var xmlHttp; var path = document.getElementById("path").value; var invoiceIds = new Array(); invoiceIds = document.getElementsByName(name); // 迭代的速度快于发送请求+收到回复的时间 所以一次get请求都还没有完成就进行了下一次请求 for (i = 0; i < invoiceIds.length; i++) { xmlHttp = creatXMLHttpRequest(); var invoiceId = invoiceIds[i].value; var url = path + "/" + actionName + ".action?" + resquestParmName + "=" + invoiceId; fu(xmlHttp,url,invoiceId); } } function fu(xmlHttp,url,invoiceId){ xmlHttp.onreadystatechange = function() { if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4) { if (xmlHttp.status == 200) { var result = xmlHttp.responseText; if (result == "0") { document.getElementById("btn" + invoiceId).disabled = "disabled"; } } } } // xmlHttp.open("GET", url, true); xmlHttp.send(null); }
Since the JS for loop and ajax run asynchronously, the for loop ends but ajax has not yet been executed. If an asynchronous request method is used, if a new XMLHttpRequest is made during each iteration, each request can be completed, but the result is still inaccurate, and some programs have not been executed.
Understand, it turns out that each iteration is to execute a few lines of code. The code for sending asynchronous ajax requests should be placed in a function, and this function should be called every iteration. That's it.
In terms of performance, For this iterative ajax request, it seems that the synchronous method has higher performance.
This problem has been solved and my understanding of ajax and http has been deepened.
The above introduces the problem of sending AJAX requests in the JavaScript for loop. I hope it will be helpful to friends who are interested in Javascript tutorials.

JavaScript runs in browsers and Node.js environments and relies on the JavaScript engine to parse and execute code. 1) Generate abstract syntax tree (AST) in the parsing stage; 2) convert AST into bytecode or machine code in the compilation stage; 3) execute the compiled code in the execution stage.

The future trends of Python and JavaScript include: 1. Python will consolidate its position in the fields of scientific computing and AI, 2. JavaScript will promote the development of web technology, 3. Cross-platform development will become a hot topic, and 4. Performance optimization will be the focus. Both will continue to expand application scenarios in their respective fields and make more breakthroughs in performance.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

Yes, the engine core of JavaScript is written in C. 1) The C language provides efficient performance and underlying control, which is suitable for the development of JavaScript engine. 2) Taking the V8 engine as an example, its core is written in C, combining the efficiency and object-oriented characteristics of C. 3) The working principle of the JavaScript engine includes parsing, compiling and execution, and the C language plays a key role in these processes.

JavaScript is at the heart of modern websites because it enhances the interactivity and dynamicity of web pages. 1) It allows to change content without refreshing the page, 2) manipulate web pages through DOMAPI, 3) support complex interactive effects such as animation and drag-and-drop, 4) optimize performance and best practices to improve user experience.

C and JavaScript achieve interoperability through WebAssembly. 1) C code is compiled into WebAssembly module and introduced into JavaScript environment to enhance computing power. 2) In game development, C handles physics engines and graphics rendering, and JavaScript is responsible for game logic and user interface.

JavaScript is widely used in websites, mobile applications, desktop applications and server-side programming. 1) In website development, JavaScript operates DOM together with HTML and CSS to achieve dynamic effects and supports frameworks such as jQuery and React. 2) Through ReactNative and Ionic, JavaScript is used to develop cross-platform mobile applications. 3) The Electron framework enables JavaScript to build desktop applications. 4) Node.js allows JavaScript to run on the server side and supports high concurrent requests.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool
