


jQuery.autocomplete supports Chinese input (firefox) correction method_jquery
But the only regret is that when the Chinese input method is turned on, firefox3.0 automatically matches Chinese pinyin, but cannot trigger matching in time for input Chinese; while under my IE6.0, there is no such problem. .
Cause analysis:
The Autocomplete plug-in triggers automatic matching of user input characters through the "keydown" event (line 92 of jquery.autocomplete.js can be analyzed). In IE6, when the input method When it is turned on, the entered characters will not trigger "keydown". It will only be triggered after the Chinese input is completed, so there is no difference between Chinese input and Latin input; but under Firefox3.0, regardless of whether the input method is turned on or not, the keydown will be triggered." keydown" event, so after the Chinese input is completed, some of the Chinese Pinyin letters just typed will be automatically matched. ------So only Firefox has a problem.
Solution:
The most common method found on the Internet is to modify line 92 of jquery.autocomplete.js and replace "keydown" with "keyup", but this is not the fundamental solution, although it can be improved after this change. In Firefox, the input Chinese is automatically matched in a timely manner, but the important event mechanisms such as carriage return and tab in the original plug-in are destroyed. For example, after this change, if your input is in a form, carriage return will be changed from the original Entering the selected items into the input becomes directly submitting the form, which is not what we want.
The principle of my method is to add an event that the original plug-in triggers the query, that is, when the characters in the input input field change, the query is re-queried (calling its internal onChange function). This is mainly for firefox. Because our system is most accessed by IE and firefox. Firefox happens to have an input change event called oninput, so we only need to insert the following code in line 199 of the original jquery.autocomplete.js:
.bind("input", function() {
// @hack:support for inputing chinese characters in firefox
onChange(0, true);
});
After insertion, the code is as follows:
...
...
jQueryinput.unbind();
jQuery(input.form).unbind(".autocomplete");
}). bind("input", function() {
// @hack:support for inputing chinese characters in firefox
onChange(0, true);
});
...
2. Support multiple enter selections:
Modify line 91:
// only opera doesn't trigger keydown multiple times while pressed, others don't work with keypress at all
$input.bind(($.browser.opera ? "keypress" : "keydown") ".autocomplete", function(event) {
Modify to:
// only opera mozilla doesn' t trigger keydown multiple times while pressed, others don't work with keypress at all
$input.bind((($.browser.opera || $.browser.mozilla) ? "keypress" : "keydown") " .autocomplete", function(event) {

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor
