The .live method is similar to .bind(), except that it allows you to bind events to DOM elements. You can bind events to the DOM. For an element that doesn’t exist yet, take a look at the following example:
Let’s say you want to indicate when a user clicks on a link that they are leaving the site.
$(document).ready( function() {
$('a').click( function() {
alert("You are now leaving this site");
return true;
});
});
Note that .click() is just a simple method to implement the more general .bind(). The code below and above are equivalent to the above implementation.
$(document).ready( function() {
$('a').bind( 'click', function() {
alert("You are now leaving this site");
return true;
});
} );
But now add a link to the page via javascript.
$('body').append('Check it out!
However, when the user clicks on that link, the method will will not be called because the link does not exist when you bind the click event to all nodes on the page, so we replace .bind() with .live():
$(document).ready( function() {
$('a ').live( 'click', function() {
alert("You are now leaving this site");
return true;
});
});
Now if you add a new link to the page, the binding will also work.
.live() How it works The magic behind
.live() is that it does not bind the event to the elements you selected, but actually binds it to the DOM tree. With the node ($(document) in the example), it is passed in the element like a parameter.
Then when you click on an element, the click event will be passed up the DOM tree until it reaches the root node. The trigger for this .click() event has been created by .live() on the root node. This trigger method will first check whether the clicked target matches the selector called by .live(). So in the above example, it will be checked whether the clicked element matches $('a') in $('a').live(). If it matches, the binding method will be executed.
Because no matter what you click within the root node, the .click() event of the root node will be triggered, and this check will occur when you click on any element added to the root node.
All .live() can be .die()
If you know .bind(), then you definitely know .unbind(). Then, .die() and .live() have a similar relationship. In order to access the above binding (do not want the dialog box to pop up when the user clicks the link), we do this:
More specifically, if there are other events that are bound and need to be retained, such as hover or others, you can Only unbind the click event.
To be more specific, if the method name has been defined, you can unbind the specified method.
specialAlert = function() {
alert(" You are now leaving this site");
return true;
}
$(document).ready( function() {
$('a').live( 'click', specialAlert );
$('a').live( 'click', someOtherFunction );
});
// then somewhere else, we could unbind only the first binding
$('a ').die( 'click', specialAlert );
Questions about .die()
When using these functions, the .die() method has a disadvantage. You can only use the element selector used in the .live() method. For example, you cannot write it like this:
$(document).ready( function() {
$('a').live( 'click', function() {
alert(" You are now leaving this site");
return true;
});
});
// it would be nice if we could then choose specific elements
// to unbind , but this will do nothing
$('a.no-alert').die();
.die() event looks like the target selection is matched and released .live() binding, but in fact, $('a.no-alert') does not have a binding, so jquery cannot find any binding to remove it, and it will not work.
What’s worse is the following one:
$( document).ready( function() {
$('a,form').live( 'click', function() {
alert("You are going to a different page");
return true;
});
});
// NEITHER of these will work
$('a').die();
$('form').die ();
// ONLY this will work
$('a,form').die();
How to fix .die()
In my next article, I will suggest a new way of executing .die() that can provide a backwards-compatible mood behavior. Maybe if I have time, I will suggest that the jQuery core development team accept my suggestions and make modifications in the next release. I hope to have more of the methods I just wrote, including optional context parameters, allowing custom nodes to be attached to events, and Not the root node.
If you want more information and examples, you can check the documentation of jQuery .live() and .die().
Also note that .delegate() and .undelegate(), they can replace .live() and .die(), they are closely related.

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
