


contains and compareDocumentPosition methods to determine whether there is a relationship between HTML nodes_javascript skills
Since then I have done a lot of research on these methods and have used them on many occasions. They prove to be very useful in many tasks (especially abstract DOM selectors regarding structures).
1. DOMElement.contains(DOMNode)
This method was first used in IE to determine whether a DOM Node is contained in another DOM Element.
This method is useful when trying to optimize CSS selector traversal (like: "#id1 #id2"). You can get the element via getElementById and then use .contains() to determine if #id1 actually contains #id2.
Note: If the DOM Node and DOM Element are consistent, .contains() will return true , although an element cannot contain itself.
Here is a simple execution wrapper that can run in: Internet Explorer, Firefox, Opera, and Safari.
function contains(a, b) {
return a.contains ? a != b && a.contains(b) : !!(a.compareDocumentPosition(arg) & 16);
}
2. NodeA.compareDocumentPosition(NodeB)
This method is part of the DOM Level 3 specification, allowing you to determine the mutual position between two DOM Nodes. This method is more powerful than .contains(). One possible application of this method is to sort DOM Nodes into a specific and precise order.
Using this method you can determine a series of information about the position of an element. All this information will return a bit code (Bit, also known as binary bit).
Little is known about those. Bit code stores multiple data as a simple number (Translator's Note: 0 or 1). Your eventual on/off of individual numbers (Translator's Note: On/Off corresponds to 0/1) will give you a final result.
Here is the result returned from NodeA.compareDocumentPosition(NodeB) with the information you can get.
Bits Number Meaning
000000 0 The elements are consistent
000001 1 The node is in a different document (or one is outside the document)
000010 2 Node B is before node A
000100 4 Node A is in Node B Before
001000 8 Node B Contains Node A
010000 16 Node A Contains Node B
100000 32 Private Use of Browser
Now, this means a possible result would be something like :
<script> <BR>alert( document.getElementById("a").compareDocumentPosition(document. getElementById("b")) == 20); <BR></script>
Once a node A contains another node B, contains B (16) and precedes B (4 ), the final result is the number 20. If you look at what happens to the bits, it will increase your understanding.
000100 (4) 010000 (16) = 010100 (20)
This, without a doubt, helps to understand the single most confusing DOM API method. Of course, his worth is well deserved.
DOMNode.compareDocumentPosition is now available in Firefox and Opera. However, there are some tricks we can use to execute it in IE.
// Compare Position - MIT Licensed, John Resig
function comparePosition(a, b){
return a.compareDocumentPosition ?
a.compareDocumentPosition(b) :
a.contains ?
( a != b && a.contains(b) && 16)
( a != b && b.contains(a) && 8 )
( a.sourceIndex >= 0 && b.sourceIndex >= 0 ?
(a.sourceIndex (a.sourceIndex > b.sourceIndex && 2 ) :
1 ) :
0;
}
IE provides us with some methods and properties that we can use. To start, use the .contains() method (as we discussed earlier) to give us a result that contains (16) or is contained (8). IE also has a .sourceIndex attribute on all DOM Elements that corresponds to the position of the element in the document, for example: document.documentElement.sourceIndex == 0. Because we have this information, we can complete two compareDocumentPosition puzzles: in front (2) and in back (4). Additionally, if an element is not in the current document, .sourceIndex will be equal to -1, which gives us another answer (1). Finally, by extrapolating this process, we can determine that if an element is equal to itself, an empty bitcode (0) is returned.
This function works in Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera. But it has incomplete functionality in Safari (because it only has the contains() method and no .sourceIndex attribute. We can only get contains (16), is contained (8), and all other results will return (1) representing a disconnect).
PPK provides a great example of making new functionality available by creating a getElementsByTagNames method. Let’s adapt it into our new method:
/ / Original by PPK quirksmode.org
function getElementsByTagNames(list, elem) {
elem = elem || document;
var tagNames = list.split(','), results = [];
for ( var i = 0; i var tags = elem.getElementsByTagName( tagNames[i] );
for ( var j = 0; j results.push( tags[j] );
}
return results.sort(function(a, b){
return 3 - (comparePosition(a, b) & 6 );
});
}
We can now use it to build the directory of a site in order:
getElementsByTagNames("h1, h2, h3");
Although Firefox and Opera have taken some initiatives to implement this method. I'm still looking forward to seeing more browsers come in to help move forward

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools
