The earliest curry function was a bit polymorphic, that is, branches were selected internally based on function parameters:
//http://www.openlaszlo.org/pipermail/laszlo-user/2005-March/000350.html
// ★★On 8 Mar 2005, at 00:06, Steve Albin wrote:
function add(a, b) {
if (arguments.length return add;
} else if (arguments.length return function(c) { return a c }
} else {
return a b;
}
}
var myadd = add( 2 );
var total = myadd(3);
A pioneer in Japan may have used very complex regular expressions and eval to come up with a method that is more similar to eval before he figured out that arguments can also be converted into arrays using Array’s native method. Modern currying means function.
function curry(fun) {
if (typeof fun != 'function') {
throw new Error("The argument must be a function.");
}
if (fun.arity == 0) {
throw new Error( "The function must have more than one argument.");
}
var funText = fun.toString();
var args = /function .*((.*))(. *)/.exec(funText)[1].split(', ');
var firstArg = args.shift();
var restArgs = args.join(', ');
var body = funText.replace(/function .*(.*) /, "");
var curriedText =
"function (" firstArg ") {"
"return function (" restArgs ")" body
"}";
eval("var curried =" curriedText);
return curried;
}
[Ctrl A Select all Note: If you need to introduce external Js, you need to refresh to execute
Then the popularity of closures , and with the discovery of the technology of array conversion arguments, the modern currying function finally made its debut. Just like the geographical discovery of the Age of Discovery in the 15th to 17th centuries, the world of JavaScript suddenly opened up a lot. The code is as follows:
//A simple modern currying function
function curry (fn, scope) {
var scope = scope || window;
var args = [];
for (var i=2, len = arguments.length; i args.push(arguments[i]);
};
return function() {
fn.apply(scope, args);
};
}
General currying functions only have two functions. The execution situation is as follows. The first execution has insufficient parameters and returns to the internal function, and the second execution is finally completed. However, we can still do some articles regarding this parameter. Look at the following function: The code is as follows:
function sum(){
var result=0;
for(var i=0, n=arguments.length; i
}
return result;
}
alert(sum(1,2,3,4,5)); // 15
There is no so-called insufficient parameter problem. If you pass in a parameter, it will also calculate . But what if no parameters are passed in? Correct, the difference is whether there are parameters or not. We can make it execute itself continuously if the parameters are present. Finally, it is executed once without parameters. In other words, the previous steps are used to store parameters. The code is as follows:
var sum2= curry(sum);
sum2 = sum2(1)(2)(3)(4)(5);
sum2(); // 15
Compared with the general currying function, this is a bit difficult . See the comments for details: The code is as follows:
var curry= function(fn){//原函数的参数为函数
return function(args){//内部函数的参数为数组,由于立即执行,因此直接到第三重去
//args是相对于第三重内部函数可是全局变量
var self= arguments.callee;//把自身保存起来(就是那个数组为参数的第二重函数)
return function(){ //这才是第二次调用的函数
if(arguments.length){//如果还有要添加的参数
[].push.apply(args,arguments);//apply把当前传入的所有参数放进args中
return self(args);
}else{
return fn.apply(this,args);//apply的第二参数为数组
}
}
}([]);
};
function sum(){
var result=0;
for(var i=0, n=arguments.length; i
}
return result;
};
var curry = function(fn){//原函数的参数为函数
return function(args){//内部函数的参数为数组,由于立即执行,因此直接到第三重去
var self= arguments.callee;//把自身保存起来
return function(){ //这才是第二次调用的函数
if(arguments.length){//如果还有要添加的参数
[].push.apply(args,arguments);
return self(args);
}
else return fn.apply(this,args);//执行
}
}([]);
};
var sum2= curry(sum);
sum2= sum2(1)(2)(3)(4)(5);
alert(sum2());
或者每次传入多个参数:
function sum(){
var result=0;
for(var i=0, n=arguments.length; i
}
return result;
};
var curry = function(fn){//原函数的参数为函数
return function(args){//内部函数的参数为数组,由于立即执行,因此直接到第三重去
var self= arguments.callee;//把自身保存起来
return function(){ //这才是第二次调用的函数
if(arguments.length){//如果还有要添加的参数
[].push.apply(args,arguments);
return self(args);
}
else return fn.apply(this,args);//执行
}
}([]);
};
var sum2= curry(sum);
sum2= sum2(1,2,3);
sum2= sum2(4,5,6);
sum2= sum2(7,8,9);
alert(sum2());
但上面的函数有不足之处,最后怎么也要放个括号,我们想只要参数足够就返回结果,多出的参数忽略。改进如下:
function curry(f) {
if (f.length == 0) return f;
function iterate(args) {
if (args.length return f.apply(null, args);
return function () {
return iterate(args.concat(Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments)));
};
}
return iterate([]);
}
[Ctrl+A 全选 注:如需引入外部Js需刷新才能执行]

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools
