Standard specifications
HTML5 specification document points out: If an element meets either of the following two rules, then the window object must have a corresponding attribute, and the attribute value is this object .
- If an element has an ID attribute, the attribute value of the ID attribute will become the attribute name of the window object.
- If an element has a name attribute, then the attribute value of the name attribute will become the attribute name of the window object. But the tag name of this element must be: a, applet, area, embed, form, frame, frameset, iframe, img, object, one of them.
Let's look at an example. Suppose there is a page that contains a div element with the ID attribute "foo":
In this way, the above div element can be accessed through window.foo (like other window properties), or the global variable foo. For example, in the Chrome console, you can do this:
> "foo" in window
true
> ; foo
Firefox
Firefox(14) Works slightly differently.
> "foo" in window
false
> typeof foo // Does this global variable exist?
object
//The error console output the following warning.//Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope.
//Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead.
> foo
[object HTMLDivElement]
//The error console output the following warning.// Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope.
//Use W3C standard document.getElementById() instead.> "foo" in window true
> "foo" in window
false
> typeof foo / / Does this global variable exist?
object
//The error console output the following warning.//Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope.
//Use W3C standard document. getElementById() instead.
> foo
[object HTMLDivElement]
//The error console output the following warning.//Element referenced by ID/NAME in the global scope.
//Use W3C standard document. getElementById() instead.> "foo" in window true
What is going on? When initialized, window does not have the attribute foo. But when this attribute is accessed for the first time (either directly through the window.foo attribute or through the global variable foo), it will be automatically created.
Translator's Note: I did not find warnings in Firefox14, 15, and 18, but there was indeed a warning when testing Firefox12.
[Note: The code in the example can only be effective when run through the script tag in the web page and cannot be run through the terminal. This is because the terminal uses different methods when handling global objects.]
Translator’s Note: I tried the code in the example in Firebug and didn’t find any difference.
Once you try to read the value of foo, although the div element will be returned normally, there will be a warning in the error console telling you that you should not do that. Obviously, such a warning is correct : You can use this feature when debugging in the terminal, but in actual code, you should not use it.
Cody Lindley wrote a jsPerf test to compare accessing foo via global variables with accessing foowindow.foo. Interestingly, only accessing window.foo in Firefox is faster.

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
