


JavaScript techniques for determining when the DOM is loaded_javascript techniques
One difficulty with working with HTML DOM documents is that JavaScript can be executed before the DOM is fully loaded, which can cause a lot of potential problems for your code. The rendering and operation sequence of the browser is roughly as follows:
HTML parsing completed
External scripts and style sheets loaded
Scripts are parsed and executed within the document
HTML DOM is fully constructed
Images and external content loading
Web page completes loading
Scripts in the head of the web page and loaded from external files will be executed before the HTML is actually constructed. As mentioned before, this is a critical issue because the scripts executed in these two places cannot access the DOM that does not yet exist. Fortunately, we have several remedies.
Currently, the most commonly used level is to completely wait for the entire page to load before performing DOM operations. This technology only needs to use the load event of the window object to bind a function, which can be triggered after the page is loaded.
addEvent(window, "load", function(){
// do something
});
The simplest operation is the slowest. In the sequential list of the loading process, you will notice that whether the page is loaded or not is completely controlled by the last step. This means that if the page has a lot of pictures, videos, etc., the user may have to log in for a while before JavaScript is executed.
Another progression can be used to listen to DOM loading status, probably the most complex (from an implementation perspective), but also the most efficient.
This technology checks whether the HTML DOM document has been loaded with the attributes necessary for execution as quickly as possible without blocking the browser loading. Here are a few key points for checking whether the HTML DOM is available:
document: You need to know whether the DOM document has been loaded. If you check quickly enough, with luck you'll see undefined.
document.getElementsByTagName and document.getElementById: Frequently use the document.getElementsByTagName and document.getElementById functions to check the document. When these functions exist, it indicates that the DOM has been loaded.
document.body: As an added bonus, checks if the element has been fully loaded. Theoretically the previous check should already be able to make a judgment, but I found that in some cases it's still not enough.
Using these checks is enough to determine whether the DOM is available ("sufficient" here means that there may be a certain millisecond time difference). This method has few flaws. Using the aforementioned checks alone, the script should run relatively well in modern browsers. However, more recently (2008?) Firefox implemented caching improvements such that the window load event can actually fire before the script can check whether the DOM is available. In order to take advantage of this, I also attached checks to the window loading event in order to achieve faster execution speed.
Finally, the domReady function collects references to all functions that need to be executed when the DOM is available. Once the DOM is considered available, these references are called and executed one by one in sequence.
// The function that monitors whether the DOM is available
function domReady(f) {
// If the DOM has been loaded, Mashan executes the function
if(domReady.done) return f();
// If we have added a function
if(domReady.timer) {
// Assume it is in the list of functions to be executed
domReady.ready.push(f);
} else {
// Bind the page after loading An event in case it completes first.
addEvent(window, "load", isDOMReady);
// Initialize the array of execution functions
domReady.ready = [f];
// Check whether the DOM is available as quickly as possible
domReady.timer = setInterval(isDOMReady, 13);
}
}
// Check whether the DOM is operational
function isDOMReady() {
// If we It can be judged that the DOM is possible, ignore
if(domReady.done) return false;
// Check whether several functions and elements are possible
if(document && document.getElementsByTagName && document.getElementById && document.body) {
// If available, we stop checking
clearInterval(domReady.timer);
domReady.timer = null;
// Execute all waiting functions
for(var i = 0; i domReady.ready[i]();
// Record that we have finished here
domReady.ready = null;
domReady.done = true;
}
}
}
Now let’s see how it is performed in an HTML document. Assume that the domReady function has been written to an external file named domready.js
<script> <BR>domReady(function(){ <BR>alert("The DOM is loaded!"); <BR>// do something <BR>}); <BR></script>
Testing DOM Loading

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
