Sharing of precautions when using cloneNode under IE_javascript skills
cloneNode is a method on the HtmlElement prototype chain, used to create a copy of the specified dom node. It accepts a Boolean parameter include_all. If include_all is set to true, the copy will have all the child nodes of the specified node.
However, the script tag is also a dom node, and cloneNode is still valid for it. It has been measured that various browsers (especially IE) have inconsistent execution results of cloneNode. The main phenomena are the following two:
IE, at least IE8 and below, when cloning a node, if the node contains a script node, the script content of the script node may be executed again.
For non-IE browsers, the script content of the script node contained in a cloneNode node will not be executed again.
I am very satisfied with the performance of browsers other than IE. Regarding the "possibility" of IE mentioned above, there are two situations:
If cloneNode is a script node, regardless of whether the node is Neither external link scripts nor embedded scripts will be executed again.
If you cloneNode another node, the embedded scripts contained under the node will not be executed, but the external link scripts contained will be executed again.
Here is a demo that reproduces the problem of cloneNode under IE.
Are you going to get dizzy after seeing this? The solution is very simple. No matter what browser it is, just remove all script tags under the target node before cloning Node. Because the script has already been executed, removing its tags will not have any impact, as follows:
function cloneNode(dom){
var scripts = dom.getElementsByTagName("script");
for(var i = scripts - 1, s; i >= 0; i --){
s = scripts[i];
s.parentNode .removeChild(s);
}
return dom.cloneNode(true);
}
Therefore, we must pay attention when using cloneNode(true) Thinking: Are all the child nodes in the copied node required? Try to get rid of all the unnecessary ones to avoid negative effects. For another example, if the copied div contains an iframe, and the iframe page has the script parent.xxx..., then these scripts in the iframe will inevitably be executed again. , there is nothing wrong with the iframe page itself (not necessarily), but because it operates on the parent, the impact of this parent is difficult to estimate. The solution is to cloneNode and then kill the iframe contained in the copy. Of course, if the iframe cannot be killed as required by the plot, the script in the iframe page will make its own judgment.
In addition, if the cloneNode target node contains the link tag, this may also have some impact. I have not done experiments. If it is useless, I will removeChild to avoid future troubles.

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
