What are phantom reads and how does InnoDB prevent them (Next-Key Locking)?

InnoDB effectively prevents phantom reading through the Next-Key Locking mechanism. 1) Next-Key Locking combines row locks and gap locks to lock records and their gaps to prevent new records from being inserted. 2) In practical applications, by optimizing query and adjusting isolation levels, lock competition can be reduced and concurrency performance can be improved.

introduction

In the world of databases, phantom reads are like ghostly existences, silently but can cause unexpected trouble. Today we are going to discuss the nature of fantasy reading and how InnoDB prevents this phenomenon through the Next-Key Locking mechanism. Through this article, you will not only understand the definition and harm of illusion reading, but also gain a deep understanding of how InnoDB's lock mechanism ensures data consistency.

Review of basic knowledge

Before discussing fantasy reading, we need to understand some basic concepts first. Transaction is the basic unit of database operations, which ensures the atomicity, consistency, isolation and persistence (ACID) of a series of operations. The isolation level is a mechanism used to control visibility between transactions. Common ones include Read Uncommitted, Read Committed, Repeatable Read and Serializable.

InnoDB is a storage engine for MySQL, which supports row-level locking, which means it can lock individual rows instead of entire tables, thereby improving concurrency performance.

Core concept or function analysis

Definition and function of illusion reading

Phantom reading refers to returning different result sets when the same query is executed at different points in time in a transaction. This usually occurs in a multi-user environment, when one transaction is executed, another transaction inserts a new row or deletes an existing row, causing the query result of the previous transaction to change.

For example, suppose Transaction A performs a range query to find all products that cost less than $100. During transaction A's execution, transaction B inserts a new record for $50. When transaction A executes the same query again, it will find a record that did not exist before, which is the phantom reading.

How it works

The main reason for the occurrence of fantasy reading is that the isolation level of the transaction is not high enough. Phantom reading is possible at the isolation levels where reads are not submitted and reads have been submitted. And at the isolation level of repeatable reads and serialization, the database will take measures to prevent phantom reading.

InnoDB prevents phantom reading through Next-Key Locking. Next-Key Locking is a locking mechanism that combines row locks and gap locks. It not only locks the record itself, but also the gaps between the records, thus preventing other transactions from inserting new records in these gaps.

Let's look at a simple example to illustrate how Next-Key Locking works:

 -- Transaction A
START TRANSACTION;
SELECT * FROM products WHERE price < 100 FOR UPDATE;

-- Transaction B
START TRANSACTION;
INSERT INTO products (name, price) VALUES (&#39;New Product&#39;, 50);

When transaction A executes a SELECT statement, InnoDB locks all records with a price of less than 100 and the gap between these records. In this way, transaction B cannot insert new records in these gaps, thus avoiding phantom reading.

Example of usage

Basic usage

Let's look at a more specific example of how InnoDB uses Next-Key Locking to prevent phantom reading:

 -- Transaction A
START TRANSACTION;
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE amount > 1000 FOR UPDATE;

-- Transaction B
START TRANSACTION;
INSERT INTO orders (customer_id, amount) VALUES (1, 1500);

In this example, transaction A locks all orders with an amount greater than 1000 and its gaps between them, and transaction B tries to insert a new order, but it will be blocked until transaction A commits or rolls back.

Advanced Usage

In some cases, we may need a finer range of control locks. For example, if we want to lock only records within a specific range, we can use an explicit lock statement:

 -- Transaction A
START TRANSACTION;
SELECT * FROM inventory WHERE quantity > 10 AND quantity < 20 FOR UPDATE;

-- Transaction B
START TRANSACTION;
UPDATE inventory SET quantity = quantity - 1 WHERE item_id = 15;

In this example, transaction A locks the records with inventory between 10 and 20 and its gaps, and transaction B tries to update the records with inventory of 15, but will be blocked until transaction A commits or rolls back.

Common Errors and Debugging Tips

Common errors when using Next-Key Locking include lock waiting timeout and deadlock. The lock wait timeout occurs when the transaction waits for the lock time exceeds the set timeout time, while the deadlock occurs when two or more transactions wait for each other to release the lock.

To debug these problems, you can use the following methods:

• Use SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS command to view the current lock status and deadlock information.
• Adjust the innodb_lock_wait_timeout parameter to increase the timeout time of lock waiting.
• Use the innodb_deadlock_detect parameter to enable or disable deadlock detection.

Performance optimization and best practices

In practical applications, Next-Key Locking may have a performance impact because it increases the overhead of locking. Here are some optimizations and best practices:

• Minimize the range of locks and lock only necessary records and gaps.
• Optimistic locking is used to reduce lock usage, such as detecting concurrent conflicts through version numbers.
• Set the isolation level reasonably, select the appropriate isolation level according to the needs of the application, and avoid unnecessary locking.

In my actual project experience, I have encountered an inventory management system of an e-commerce platform. Due to frequent inventory updates and queries, it has caused serious lock competition problems. By optimizing query statements and adjusting isolation levels, we successfully reduce lock waiting time and improve the system's concurrency performance.

In general, understanding and correct use of Next-Key Locking is the key to ensuring database transaction consistency. I hope this article can help you better master this technology and avoid the trouble caused by phantom reading in practical applications.

The above is the detailed content of What are phantom reads and how does InnoDB prevent them (Next-Key Locking)?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!