Home >System Tutorial >LINUX >The Arch Decision: Evaluating If a Leap From Manjaro to EndeavourOS Is Right for You
Manjaro vs. EndeavourOS: The choice of Arch Linux distribution
In the vast world of Linux distributions, choosing the right system is often difficult to make. Manjaro and EndeavourOS based on Arch Linux, these two shining stars are increasingly favored by users. They all originate from the Arch Linux ecosystem, but they are aimed at different types of users and provide a unique user experience. If you are a Manjaro user and are considering turning to EndeavourOS, this article will help you make an informed decision.
Background information
What is Manjaro? Manjaro is an Arch Linux-based distribution designed to provide a user-friendly experience. It adheres to the "install-ready" concept, is easy to get started, and is very suitable for Linux beginners. It provides a variety of desktop environments, such as XFCE, KDE and GNOME. Manjaro also has its own package manager, Pamac, making software installation a breeze. Automatic updates and built-in stability checks make it ideal for users who want the power of Arch Linux but are reluctant to face its complexity.
What is EndeavourOS? EndeavourOS is also a distribution based on Arch Linux, but it is closer to native Arch Linux. For intermediate to advanced users, EndeavourOS provides an almost streamlined experience, allowing users to customize the system according to their own wishes. While it also provides an installer, it is more manual than Manjaro's Calamaris installer. It aims to provide users with an Arch experience and minimize additional features, relying mainly on Arch User Repository (AUR) and Pacman for package management.
Comparative standards
For an objective comparison of Manjaro and EndeavourOS, we will evaluate it according to the following criteria:
Detailed comparison
Installation Easily: Manjaro provides an extremely user-friendly installation process through its Calamars installer. It is mostly automated and requires minimal user interaction.
EndeavourOS provides a more manual installation process. While it also provides an installer, it allows for more customization during the setup process, which may be more attractive to advanced users, but may be more intimidating for beginners.
Package Management: Manjaro uses Pamac for package management, which provides a simple and easy-to-use graphical interface. It also supports AUR, thus providing a wide range of software availability.
EndeavourOS is closer to the essence of Arch, using Pacman as its package manager. While it lacks the default graphical package management interface, it provides a more "Arch-style" experience for those who prefer the command line.
Desktop Environment: Manjaro offers a variety of desktop environments out of the box, such as XFCE, KDE and GNOME, all custom-made to enhance the user experience. This is great for users who want an optimized desktop environment without having to tweak too much.
EndeavourOS provides a more native desktop environment experience. While it also offers a variety of options, they are not as finely tuned as Manjaro, which gives users the flexibility to customize their desktops to their own wishes.
System Performance: Manjaro is optimized for performance, but it tends to consume more system resources due to additional features and custom environments.
EndeavourOS generally provides better system performance due to its leaner simplicity, especially on older hardware, and gives users greater control over what is installed on their systems.
Software Availability: Both distributions have access to the Arch User Repository (AUR), making software availability nearly unlimited. However, Manjaro offers a wider range of software in its official repository, while EndeavourOS relies more on AUR.
Community Support: Manjaro has a larger community, so it provides more timely online support through forums and tutorials. EndeavourOS has a smaller community, but very focused. Support is usually more professional, but may take longer to get.
Stability and Updates: Manjaro provides higher stability as it performs additional testing before publishing the package to the stable branch. This is very beneficial for users who prioritize stable systems over the latest updates.
EndeavourOS provides a more cutting-edge experience by releasing packages faster. This may cause the system to be less stable, but allows users to get new features and updates faster.
Pros and cons
Advantages of continuing to use Manjaro:
Advantages of Switching to EndeavourOS:
User reviews
"Switching to EndeavourOS is like taking off the auxiliary wheel. Before switching, I didn't realize how much I liked system customization."
"I've tried EndeavourOS, but Manjaro is more in line with my needs. It's stable and I don't have to take the time to adjust to get everything working properly," said Emily, a graphic designer.
in conclusion
Choose between Manjaro and EndeavourOS, depending on your needs and comfort level. If you prefer a system that works out of the box with security guarantees with additional features and stability, Manjaro is your go-to. However, if you like to dig deep into system customization and get updates as quickly as possible, EndeavourOS is your best bet.
Choosing a Linux distribution is a personal journey. We encourage you to try Manjaro and EndeavourOS to see which one is more in line with your needs and preferences. Do you have any experience or tips to share? We'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below.
The above is the detailed content of The Arch Decision: Evaluating If a Leap From Manjaro to EndeavourOS Is Right for You. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!