Achieving 100% Code Coverage: A Practical Guide
This article details how to achieve 100% code coverage for your project efficiently. Let's dive in!
Preparation
Before starting, identify these key components:
- Test Scope: Define the code segment to be tested (function, module, etc.).
- Third-Party Libraries: Choose testing libraries (e.g., Mocha).
- Report Format: Select the report format (e.g., lcov for Codecov).
Planning upfront streamlines the testing process.
Practical Implementation
This example uses a TypeScript file:
Create a test
folder in your project's root directory. Tests are placed in files with the .test.ts
extension (or similar, like .spec.ts
).
We'll use Mocha, Sinon, and c8 for coverage reporting:
"devDependencies": { "@types/mocha": "^10.0.9", "@types/sinon": "^17.0.3", "c8": "^10.1.2", "mocha": "^10.8.2", "sinon": "^19.0.2" }
These packages need to be installed. Additional libraries will be added later.
The following commands run tests and generate reports:
"scripts": { "test": "mocha --require ts-node/esm --experimental-specifier-resolution=node", "test:watch": "mocha --watch --require ts-node/esm --experimental-specifier-resolution=node", "coverage": "c8 --reporter=lcov npm run test", "coverage:default": "c8 npm run test" },
The test:watch
command is crucial; it automatically reruns tests on code changes, eliminating manual restarts.
TypeScript compilation requires additional modules:
"devDependencies": { "ts-node": "^10.9.2", "typescript": "^5.6.3" }
Example: Testing a Simple Function
Let's test this add
function:
add.test.ts
export function add(a: number, b: number): number { return a + b; }
The corresponding test file:
add.ts
import { strict as assert } from 'assert'; import { add } from '../add'; describe('Function add()', () => { it('should return 5 when adding 2 and 3', () => { const result = add(2, 3); assert.equal(result, 5); }); // ... more test cases ... });
This compares expected and actual results. Failing tests indicate issues. Thorough testing ensures that code modifications don't break existing functionality.
Testing DOM Interactions
To test DOM manipulations (e.g., click events), install jsdom
and jsdom-global
:
"devDependencies": { "@types/node": "^22.9.0", "jsdom": "^25.0.1", "jsdom-global": "^3.0.2", }
Configure these packages:
require("jsdom-global")(); global.DOMParser = window.DOMParser;
This allows Node.js to simulate a browser's DOM environment.
Testing Asynchronous Operations
For asynchronous functions (e.g., API calls), use nock
and node-fetch
:
"devDependencies": { "nock": "^13.5.6", "node-fetch": "^2.7.0", }
Configure these packages:
import fetch from "node-fetch"; global.fetch = fetch as any;
nock
mocks API responses, providing predictable and stable test environments. node-fetch
provides a browser-like fetch
implementation for Node.js.
Codecov Integration
To integrate with Codecov, create a GitHub repository and follow Codecov's setup instructions. GitHub Actions can automate report uploads. A sample GitHub Actions workflow:
"devDependencies": { "@types/mocha": "^10.0.9", "@types/sinon": "^17.0.3", "c8": "^10.1.2", "mocha": "^10.8.2", "sinon": "^19.0.2" }
This workflow runs tests and uploads coverage reports to Codecov on each push or pull request. A Codecov badge can then be added to your README.
Conclusion
By following these steps and adapting them to your specific needs, you can achieve and maintain 100% test coverage, improving code quality and reliability. Remember to refactor repetitive test code into reusable functions for better maintainability.
The above is the detailed content of How to get % code coverage? ✅. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

mPDF
mPDF is a PHP library that can generate PDF files from UTF-8 encoded HTML. The original author, Ian Back, wrote mPDF to output PDF files "on the fly" from his website and handle different languages. It is slower than original scripts like HTML2FPDF and produces larger files when using Unicode fonts, but supports CSS styles etc. and has a lot of enhancements. Supports almost all languages, including RTL (Arabic and Hebrew) and CJK (Chinese, Japanese and Korean). Supports nested block-level elements (such as P, DIV),
