Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Are Parentheses Optional in C# 3.0 Object Initializers?
Optional brackets in C# 3.0 object initializer constructor
In C# 3.0, when initializing an object using object initializer syntax, you can omit the parentheses around the constructor if the constructor does not have any parameters. This is because the curly brace after the type name indicates the beginning of the object's initializer.
Design Considerations
The decision to make brackets optional was driven by several factors, including:
Consideration of ambiguity
While optional parentheses pose no problem in the context of an object initializer, they can introduce ambiguity if applied to a default constructor call without an object initializer. Consider the following code:
<code class="language-c#">class P { class B { public class M { } } class C : B { new public void M(){} } static void Main() { new C().M(); // 1 new C.M(); // 2 } }</code>
Line 1 creates a new C object and calls instance method M. Line 2 creates a new B.M object and calls its constructor. If the parentheses on line 2 were optional, the program would be ambiguous because it is unclear whether C.M refers to the constructor of C or to the class M nested in B .
Heuristic-based disambiguation
To resolve potential ambiguities, the compiler uses heuristics to determine the intent of the code. For example, if there is a type, field, or method with the same name as a dot identifier, the dot identifier is considered to refer to that member. However, the heuristics used do not always lead to the expected interpretation, especially in complex code.
The above is the detailed content of Why Are Parentheses Optional in C# 3.0 Object Initializers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!