I've been a big fan of Vue for a long time. I remember when I first started using it, the simplicity was a breath of fresh air, especially compared to the React projects I had been wrestling with. Vue 2 felt like it had a clear philosophy: be approachable, be straightforward, and let developers focus on the application, not the framework itself.
But lately, I've been spending more time in Vue 3, and honestly? I'm a bit confused. I'm starting to see some patterns that feel awfully familiar, and not in a good way. It's like I'm starting to see Vue 3... slowly morph into something resembling React.
Now, I'm not trying to bash Vue 3. It has a ton of great features, and the composition API is powerful. But I can't shake this feeling that we're losing some of the core principles that made Vue so unique in the first place.
The "Vue Way": What We Loved
Let's be real. A big part of Vue's appeal, especially Vue 2, was its ease of use. You had the straightforward Options API. Templates were a joy to work with; simple and intuitive. You could spin up a Vue app quickly without having to wade through complex configurations. The ecosystem felt manageable; you had a solid router (vue-router) and a state management pattern (vuex), and that was it! You could be very efficient using Vue.
Here’s a simple example of a Vue 2 component:
<template> <div> <p>{{ message }}</p> <button>Reverse</button> </div> </template> <script> export default { data() { return { message: "Hello Vue 2!", }; }, methods: { reverseMessage() { this.message = this.message.split("").reverse().join(""); }, }, }; </script>
Simple. Direct. Easy to understand. This was the Vue promise.
The Shift: When Things Started to Feel... Different
But with Vue 3, things started to shift. The introduction of the Composition API, while powerful, brings an entirely different mental model to the table. It feels... abstract. Suddenly, simple tasks now require more code. You can do the same things in both APIs, but in some situations, the complexity feels uncalled for.
Here’s an example of the same component in Vue 3, using the Composition API:
<template> <div> <p>{{ message }}</p> <button>Reverse</button> </div> </template> <script setup> import { ref } from 'vue'; const message = ref("Hello Vue 3!") function reverseMessage() { message.value = message.value.split("").reverse().join(""); } </script>
It does the same, but... doesn't it feel like more work? Look at how even a simple message variable now requires a ref and needs a value to access its content! It’s a bit much for something that was previously straightforward.
And it's not just the composition API. The state management space has also become more complicated. We now have Pinia, which is great, but now we have another choice to make. It starts feeling like "react-like" complexity, where there isn't a single way of doing things and the developer has to make many decisions before coding.
I'm also starting to see some Vue 3 projects that feel like they've gone completely off the deep end, with intricate setups and layers of abstraction for projects that might only need the basics. It is like the React way where you will see a hello world done with 10 libraries.
The Growing Ecosystem & Choices
I can't help but notice the growth of the Vue ecosystem. New tools and libraries seem to pop up constantly, which is both exciting and overwhelming.
It makes me think about a feeling that a lot of us React devs have: "option paralysis." And I'm starting to feel it with Vue 3:
Should I use Pinia or Vuex?
Which set of testing utilities should I go with?
Should I just create everything from scratch or adopt a big component library?
This was something I thought I left behind when I moved to Vue...
Am I Crazy?
I know, I know. Maybe I'm just missing something. Maybe these changes are all necessary for Vue to grow and adapt. Maybe it's just me and my preferences.
But I can't shake this feeling that the core appeal of Vue—its simplicity, its clarity, its "just works" nature—is being eroded a little bit. I'm worried that we're slowly but surely building a Vue ecosystem that looks and feels more like React. It's starting to feel like we are losing Vue unique identity.
So, what do you think? Am I alone in this? Are you seeing the same trends? I'd love to hear your perspective. Maybe I just need someone to convince me I'm wrong, or maybe we're all feeling a little bit of the same thing.
Let’s discuss in the comments!
The above is the detailed content of Vue lowly Turning Into React? (Im Honestly confused.). For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript's applications in the real world include server-side programming, mobile application development and Internet of Things control: 1. Server-side programming is realized through Node.js, suitable for high concurrent request processing. 2. Mobile application development is carried out through ReactNative and supports cross-platform deployment. 3. Used for IoT device control through Johnny-Five library, suitable for hardware interaction.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor