I've been a big fan of Vue for a long time. I remember when I first started using it, the simplicity was a breath of fresh air, especially compared to the React projects I had been wrestling with. Vue 2 felt like it had a clear philosophy: be approachable, be straightforward, and let developers focus on the application, not the framework itself.
But lately, I've been spending more time in Vue 3, and honestly? I'm a bit confused. I'm starting to see some patterns that feel awfully familiar, and not in a good way. It's like I'm starting to see Vue 3... slowly morph into something resembling React.
Now, I'm not trying to bash Vue 3. It has a ton of great features, and the composition API is powerful. But I can't shake this feeling that we're losing some of the core principles that made Vue so unique in the first place.
The "Vue Way": What We Loved
Let's be real. A big part of Vue's appeal, especially Vue 2, was its ease of use. You had the straightforward Options API. Templates were a joy to work with; simple and intuitive. You could spin up a Vue app quickly without having to wade through complex configurations. The ecosystem felt manageable; you had a solid router (vue-router) and a state management pattern (vuex), and that was it! You could be very efficient using Vue.
Here’s a simple example of a Vue 2 component:
<template> <div> <p>{{ message }}</p> <button>Reverse</button> </div> </template> <script> export default { data() { return { message: "Hello Vue 2!", }; }, methods: { reverseMessage() { this.message = this.message.split("").reverse().join(""); }, }, }; </script>
Simple. Direct. Easy to understand. This was the Vue promise.
The Shift: When Things Started to Feel... Different
But with Vue 3, things started to shift. The introduction of the Composition API, while powerful, brings an entirely different mental model to the table. It feels... abstract. Suddenly, simple tasks now require more code. You can do the same things in both APIs, but in some situations, the complexity feels uncalled for.
Here’s an example of the same component in Vue 3, using the Composition API:
<template> <div> <p>{{ message }}</p> <button>Reverse</button> </div> </template> <script setup> import { ref } from 'vue'; const message = ref("Hello Vue 3!") function reverseMessage() { message.value = message.value.split("").reverse().join(""); } </script>
It does the same, but... doesn't it feel like more work? Look at how even a simple message variable now requires a ref and needs a value to access its content! It’s a bit much for something that was previously straightforward.
And it's not just the composition API. The state management space has also become more complicated. We now have Pinia, which is great, but now we have another choice to make. It starts feeling like "react-like" complexity, where there isn't a single way of doing things and the developer has to make many decisions before coding.
I'm also starting to see some Vue 3 projects that feel like they've gone completely off the deep end, with intricate setups and layers of abstraction for projects that might only need the basics. It is like the React way where you will see a hello world done with 10 libraries.
The Growing Ecosystem & Choices
I can't help but notice the growth of the Vue ecosystem. New tools and libraries seem to pop up constantly, which is both exciting and overwhelming.
It makes me think about a feeling that a lot of us React devs have: "option paralysis." And I'm starting to feel it with Vue 3:
Should I use Pinia or Vuex?
Which set of testing utilities should I go with?
Should I just create everything from scratch or adopt a big component library?
This was something I thought I left behind when I moved to Vue...
Am I Crazy?
I know, I know. Maybe I'm just missing something. Maybe these changes are all necessary for Vue to grow and adapt. Maybe it's just me and my preferences.
But I can't shake this feeling that the core appeal of Vue—its simplicity, its clarity, its "just works" nature—is being eroded a little bit. I'm worried that we're slowly but surely building a Vue ecosystem that looks and feels more like React. It's starting to feel like we are losing Vue unique identity.
So, what do you think? Am I alone in this? Are you seeing the same trends? I'd love to hear your perspective. Maybe I just need someone to convince me I'm wrong, or maybe we're all feeling a little bit of the same thing.
Let’s discuss in the comments!
The above is the detailed content of Vue lowly Turning Into React? (Im Honestly confused.). For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
