Home >Backend Development >C++ >How to Properly Handle Fire-and-Forget Async Methods in ASP.NET MVC?

How to Properly Handle Fire-and-Forget Async Methods in ASP.NET MVC?

DDD
DDDOriginal
2025-01-12 19:26:43401browse

How to Properly Handle Fire-and-Forget Async Methods in ASP.NET MVC?

Managing Fire-and-Forget Asynchronous Operations in ASP.NET MVC Controllers

Asynchronous "fire-and-forget" methods, such as DeleteFooAsync, are frequently encountered in asynchronous programming. While the conventional advice is to avoid async/await in these scenarios, this can be impractical when a synchronous counterpart is unavailable.

Simply handling unobserved exceptions using TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException is unreliable, as synchronization context issues can arise.

Wrapping the asynchronous method within a try-catch block, as shown below, addresses exceptions but proves cumbersome for numerous methods:

<code class="language-csharp">private async void DeleteFooWrapperAsync()
{
    try
    {
        await DeleteFooAsync();
    }
    catch (Exception exception)
    {
        m_log.Error("DeleteFooAsync failed: " + exception.ToString());
    }
}</code>

The most robust solution for fire-and-forget calls within an ASP.NET MVC controller is employing Task.Run:

<code class="language-csharp">Task foo = Task.Run(() => DeleteFooAsync());</code>

This offloads the asynchronous operation to a separate thread, preventing it from blocking the response and ensuring reliable execution.

The above is the detailed content of How to Properly Handle Fire-and-Forget Async Methods in ASP.NET MVC?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn