You, the person who uses rxjs in your daily life, may have noticed that since version 6.4. RxJS placed a deprecated annotation in the subscribe:
method@deprecated — Instead of passing separate callback arguments, use an observer argument. Signatures taking separate callback arguments will be removed in v8. Details: https://rxjs.dev/deprecations/subscribe-arguments
The justification is that using separate callbacks generates worse reading of the method, and therefore it is preferable to use subscribe arguments, destructuring the properties that the method returns.
To better understand what this looks like in practice, let's look at a quick example:
data.js
import { Observable } from "rxjs"; /** * Cria um observable que emite valores numéricos de 1 até 5, e então se finaliza. * * @returns {Observable<number>} Um observable que emite números de 1 até 5 em sequência. */ export const data = () => { return new Observable((observer) => { for (let i = 1; i } Um observable que emite um erro. */ export const dataWithError = () => { return new Observable((observer) => { observer.error("Aconteceu um erro!"); }); }; </number>
This will be our base file. The first method outputs numbers from 1 to 5 in sequence with the .next(); method, and as soon as the loop is finished, the observable is completed with the .complete(); method.
The second method creates an observable that throws an error immediately
PS: when the .error() method is called, the observable stops emitting values and cannot continue emitting values via .next() or be completed with .complete().
And let's get to the point.
We will use as a first example the way that is currently deprecated, and then I will show how to use the observable argument.
import { data, dataWithError } from "./data.js"; data().subscribe( (value) => console.log(value), (error) => {}, () => { console.log("completou"); } ); dataWithError().subscribe( () => {}, (error) => { console.error({ error }); } );
Note that because it is an example it is something more visible, but at the same time, we need to know the order of each callback (next, error and complete).
That said, let's get to how to use argument observables:
import { data, dataWithError } from "./data.js"; data().subscribe({ next: (data) => console.log(data), complete: () => console.log("completou"), }); dataWithError() .subscribe({ error: (error) => console.error({ error }) });
From this point on with the argument observables, we have a cleaner reading of what we are using within the subscribe method, not needing to declare callbacks or arguments that we will not use.
It is an easy migration to perform, and will leave your code without deprecation messages for this API.
The above is the detailed content of Migrating subscribe Callbacks to subscribe arguments in RxJS. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
