Home >Backend Development >C++ >Thread-Safe Dictionaries in .NET: ConcurrentDictionary vs. Custom Implementations?

Thread-Safe Dictionaries in .NET: ConcurrentDictionary vs. Custom Implementations?

DDD
DDDOriginal
2025-01-08 11:17:42558browse

Thread-Safe Dictionaries in .NET: ConcurrentDictionary vs. Custom Implementations?

.NET Thread-Safe Dictionary: ConcurrentDictionary vs. Custom Implementation

One way to ensure thread safety in a dictionary is to create a custom implementation, such as

derived from IDictionary. However, modern .NET versions offer a simpler and more elegant solution: SafeDictionary. ConcurrentDictionary The

class is designed for multi-threaded environments and has several advantages over manual methods: ConcurrentDictionary

  • Built-in thread safety: Has built-in thread synchronization mechanism, no need for explicit locking. ConcurrentDictionary
  • Simple code: Simplified API reduces code complexity, making the code clearer and easier to maintain.
  • High performance: Uses a lock-free algorithm to ensure maximum performance even under high concurrency. ConcurrentDictionary
Example:

<code class="language-csharp">var sharedDictionary = new ConcurrentDictionary<TKey, TValue>();

// 添加项(无需手动锁定)
sharedDictionary.TryAdd(key, value);</code>
By using

you can achieve thread safety without sacrificing the elegance or performance of your code. ConcurrentDictionary

The above is the detailed content of Thread-Safe Dictionaries in .NET: ConcurrentDictionary vs. Custom Implementations?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement:
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn