


Hey everyone!
I’ve been working on a lightweight React hook that I called useAsync that mimics some of the essential features of React Query (like fetching, caching, retries, etc.) but in a more compact, easily customizable package. Below is a quick breakdown of how it works internally, referencing the relevant code sections. If you want to see the entire code, head over to the repo:
Full Source Code on GitHub.
The hook is also available on npm as api-refetch.
Why Making My Own Hook?
While React Query and SWR are both great libraries, I wanted a more hands-on approach for a few reasons:
Lightweight Footprint
While React Query and SWR are feature-rich, they can be relatively large (React Query ~2.2 MB, SWR ~620 kB). api-refetch is around 250 kB, making it ideal for smaller apps where bundle size is a big concern. This hook as meant to be installed as a dependency of another library (Intlayer). As a result, the size of the solution was an important consideration.Easy to Customize & Optimize
I needed some specific capabilities—like storing/fetching data from local storage and managing parallel requests using a straightforward approach.
By cloning the repo or copying the code directly into your project, you can strip out any unwanted features and keep only what you need. This not only reduces bundle size but also minimizes unnecessary re-renders and increase, giving you a leaner, more performant solution tailored to your specific requirements.No Required Provider
I wanted to avoid Context Provider to make the hook global, and keep it's usage as simple as possible. So I made a version of the hooke based on a Zustand store (see example bellow).Learning Exercise
Building an async library from scratch is an excellent way to understand concurrency, caching, and state management internals.
In short, rolling my own hook was a chance to hone in on precisely the features I need (and skip the ones I don’t) while keeping the library small and easy to understand.
Covered Features
The React hook manage:
- Fetching & State Management: Handles loading, error, success, and fetched states.
- Caching & Storage: Optionally caches data (via React states or Zustand under the hood) and offers local storage support.
- Retries & Revalidation: Configurable retry limits and automatic revalidation intervals.
- Activation & Invalidation: Automatically activates and invalidates queries depending on other queries' or states. Example: automatically fetch some data when the user logs in. And invalidate it when the user logs out.
- Parallel Component Mount Fetching: Prevents multiple simultaneous requests for the same resource when multiple components mount at once.
How the Code Works
Below are the key points in api-refetch and short references to the relevant parts of the code in useAsync.tsx.
1. Fetching and Handling Parallel Mounting
- Code Snippet:
// This map stores any in-progress Promise to avoid sending parallel requests // for the same resource across multiple components. const pendingPromises = new Map(); const fetch: T = async (...args) => { // Check if a request with the same key + args is already running if (pendingPromises.has(keyWithArgs)) { return pendingPromises.get(keyWithArgs); } // Otherwise, store a new Promise and execute const promise = (async () => { setQueryState(keyWithArgs, { isLoading: true }); // ...perform fetch here... })(); // Keep it in the map until it resolves or rejects pendingPromises.set(keyWithArgs, promise); return await promise; };
- Explanation: Here, we store any ongoing fetch in a pendingPromises map. When two components try to fetch the same resource simultaneously (by having the same keyWithArgs), the second one just reuses the ongoing request instead of making a duplicate network call.
2. Revalidation
- Code Snippet:
// Handle periodic revalidation if caching is enabled useEffect( () => { if (!revalidationEnabled || revalidateTime { fetch(...storedArgsRef.current); }, revalidateTime); return () => clearTimeout(timeout); }, [ /* dependencies */ ] );
- Explanation: Whenever you enable revalidation, api-refetch checks if the cached data is older than a specified revalidateTime. If it is, the data is automatically re-fetched in the background to keep your UI in sync without extra manual triggers.
3. Retry Logic
- Code Snippet:
useEffect( () => { const isRetryEnabled = errorCount > 0 && retryLimit > 0; const isRetryLimitReached = errorCount > retryLimit; if (!isEnabled || !enabled) return; // Hook is disabled if (!isRetryEnabled) return; // Retry is disabled if (isRetryLimitReached) return; // Retry limit has been reached if (!(cacheEnabled || storeEnabled)) return; // Useless to retry if caching is disabled if (isLoading) return; // Fetch is already in progress if (isSuccess) return; // Hook has already fetched successfully const timeout = setTimeout(() => { fetch(...storedArgsRef.current); }, retryTime); return () => clearTimeout(timeout); }, [ /* dependencies */ ] );
- Explanation: On error, the hook counts how many failed attempts have occurred. If it’s still below the retryLimit, it automatically waits retryTime milliseconds before trying again. This process continues until data is successfully fetched or the retry limit is reached.
4. Auto-Fetch
- Code Snippet:
// Auto-fetch data on hook mount if autoFetch is true useEffect( () => { if (!autoFetch) return; // Auto-fetch is disabled if (!isEnabled || !enabled) return; // Hook is disabled if (isFetched && !isInvalidated) return; // Hook have already fetched or invalidated if (isLoading) return; // Fetch is already in progress fetch(...storedArgsRef.current); }, [ /* dependencies */ ] );
- Explanation: With autoFetch set to true, the hook will automatically run the async function as soon as the component mounts—perfect for “fire-and-forget” scenarios where you always want the data on load.
See the Full Source on GitHub
Check out the complete code, which includes local storage logic, query invalidation, and more here:
- Full Source Code
Feel free to give it a try, report issues, or contribute if you’re interested. Any feedback is much appreciated!
Example of use
Installation
Copy the code or code the (repo)[https://github.com/aymericzip/api-refetch]
Or
// This map stores any in-progress Promise to avoid sending parallel requests // for the same resource across multiple components. const pendingPromises = new Map(); const fetch: T = async (...args) => { // Check if a request with the same key + args is already running if (pendingPromises.has(keyWithArgs)) { return pendingPromises.get(keyWithArgs); } // Otherwise, store a new Promise and execute const promise = (async () => { setQueryState(keyWithArgs, { isLoading: true }); // ...perform fetch here... })(); // Keep it in the map until it resolves or rejects pendingPromises.set(keyWithArgs, promise); return await promise; };
Quick Example
// Handle periodic revalidation if caching is enabled useEffect( () => { if (!revalidationEnabled || revalidateTime { fetch(...storedArgsRef.current); }, revalidateTime); return () => clearTimeout(timeout); }, [ /* dependencies */ ] );
That’s it! Give it a try, and let me know how it goes. Feedback, questions, or contributions are more than welcome on GitHub.
GitHub: api-refetch
Happy coding!
The above is the detailed content of Showcase of a Lightweight Hook for Async Data Fetching & Caching in React. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools
