I highly recommend Edison's post on Big-O complexity in JavaScript. It's the friendliest article I've seen on the topic.
Article No Longer Available
I'll be taking points from Edison here as I visualize Big-O time complexity with flowcharts.
O log(n)
Logarithmic Time
The way I visually understand time complexity is by looking at the iterator, i*2 for example , and looking at how many loops the function has.
O(n)
Linear Time
Linear time and logarithmic time look similar but the output is different because of the conditions of the loop. exampleLogarithmic(100) will return 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, whereas exampleLinear(100) simply loops through all positive integers under 100.
O(n^2)
Quadratic Time
The number of loops coincides with the exponent which n is raised to. You can literally see the function grow bigger as time complexity increases.
O(n^3)
Cubic Time
This isn't the only way to understand time complexity, but it is really helpful to literally see the function grow longer as time complexity increases. Sometimes code written in black and white
blocks doesn't get the point across to visual learners. <p>Now let's have a quiz. What is the time complexity of this function?</p> <p>Make your guess...<br><br> <img src="/static/imghwm/default1.png" data-src="https://img.php.cn/upload/article/000/000/000/173601046526425.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,p_40" class="lazy" alt="Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts"><br><br> It's linear! I can tell because there's one loop and the iterator doesn't cause the loop to skip over any integers.</p> <p>What is the time complexity of this function?<br><br> <img src="/static/imghwm/default1.png" data-src="https://img.php.cn/upload/article/000/000/000/173601046682236.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,p_40" class="lazy" alt="Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts"><br><br> Don't doubt yourself. Although this is a bit different from the first examples, it has linear time complexity.</p> <p>What is the time complexity of this function?<br><br> <img src="/static/imghwm/default1.png" data-src="https://img.php.cn/upload/article/000/000/000/173601046719860.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,p_40" class="lazy" alt="Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts"><br><br> You may see a pattern here. It's linear!</p><p>Now, if you've been following my train of logic, this may be a trick question:<br><br> <img src="/static/imghwm/default1.png" data-src="https://img.php.cn/upload/article/000/000/000/173601046876014.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,p_40" class="lazy" alt="Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts"></p> <p>I said that the number of loops denoted the exponent n is raised to. So why is does this have linear time complexity and not quadratic?</p> <p>This would have quadratic time complexity if it showed a for loop inside of another for loop. However, one for loop that runs <em>after</em> another for loop does not have quadratic but rather linear time complexity.</p> <p>Okay, so what is the time complexity of this function?<br><br> <img src="/static/imghwm/default1.png" data-src="https://img.php.cn/upload/article/000/000/000/173601046913700.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,p_40" class="lazy" alt="Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts"><br><br> There's nothing tricky here. This has quadratic time complexity.</p> <p>Now, for your last question - a question that questions all the other questions - what is this function's time complexity?<br><br> <img src="/static/imghwm/default1.png" data-src="https://img.php.cn/upload/article/000/000/000/173601047060673.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,p_40" class="lazy" alt="Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts"><br><br> I hope you're looking at the conditions of the for loop as well as the sheer number of loops. This has quadratic time complexity because of the loop condition i<n> <p>I generated the images in this post with my app, whose development process I described in another post:</p> <p><img src="/static/imghwm/default1.png" data-src="https://img.php.cn/upload/article/000/000/000/173601047160481.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,p_40" class="lazy" alt="Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts">[</p> <h2> How to get 100 on Lighthouse </h2> <h3> ender minyard ・ Aug 30 '20 ・ 2 min read </h3> <h2> webperf#speed#javascript#webdev </h2> <p>](/ender_minyard/how-i-got-100-on-lighthouse-2icd)</p> </n></p>
The above is the detailed content of Big O Notation: Understanding Time Complexity using Flowcharts. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

PhpStorm Mac version
The latest (2018.2.1) professional PHP integrated development tool

EditPlus Chinese cracked version
Small size, syntax highlighting, does not support code prompt function
