Building on the foundations of this guide on creating an in-memory cache, we’ll take it further by introducing configurable data persistence. By leveraging the Adapter and Strategy patterns, we’ll design an extensible system that decouples storage mechanisms from the caching logic, allowing seamless integration of databases or services as needed.
The Vision: Decoupling Like an ORM
The goal is to make the cache extensible without altering its core logic. Inspired by ORM systems, our approach involves a shared API abstraction. This allows storage — such as localStorage, IndexedDB, or even a remote database—to work interchangeably with minimal code changes.
The Storage Adapter Base Class
Here’s the abstract class defining the API for any persistence system:
export abstract class StorageAdapter { abstract connect(): Promise<void>; abstract add(key: string, value: unknown): Promise<void>; abstract get(key: string): Promise<unknown null>; abstract getAll(): Promise<record unknown>>; abstract delete(key: string): Promise<void>; abstract clear(): Promise<void>; } </void></void></record></unknown></void></void>
Any storage solution must extend this base class, ensuring consistency in interaction. For instance, here’s the implementation for IndexedDB:
Example: IndexedDB Adapter
This adapter implements the StorageAdapter interface to persist cache data in an IndexedDB store.
import { StorageAdapter } from './storage_adapter'; /** * IndexedDBAdapter is an implementation of the StorageAdapter * interface designed to provide a persistent storage mechanism * using IndexedDB. This adapter can be reused for other cache * implementations or extended for similar use cases, ensuring * flexibility and scalability. */ export class IndexedDBAdapter extends StorageAdapter { private readonly dbName: string; private readonly storeName: string; private db: IDBDatabase | null = null; /** * Initializes the adapter with the specified database and store * names. Defaults are provided to make it easy to set up without * additional configuration. */ constructor(dbName: string = 'cacheDB', storeName: string = 'cacheStore') { super(); this.dbName = dbName; this.storeName = storeName; } /** * Connects to the IndexedDB database and initializes it if * necessary. This asynchronous method ensures that the database * and object store are available before any other operations. * It uses the `onupgradeneeded` event to handle schema creation * or updates, making it a robust solution for versioning. */ async connect(): Promise<void> { return await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const request = indexedDB.open(this.dbName, 1); request.onupgradeneeded = (event) => { const db = (event.target as IDBOpenDBRequest).result; if (!db.objectStoreNames.contains(this.storeName)) { db.createObjectStore(this.storeName, { keyPath: 'key' }); } }; request.onsuccess = (event) => { this.db = (event.target as IDBOpenDBRequest).result; resolve(); }; request.onerror = () => reject(request.error); }); } /** * Adds or updates a key-value pair in the store. This method is * asynchronous to ensure compatibility with the non-blocking * nature of IndexedDB and to prevent UI thread blocking. Using * the `put` method ensures idempotency: the operation will * insert or replace the entry. */ async add(key: string, value: unknown): Promise<void> { await this._withTransaction('readwrite', (store) => store.put({ key, value })); } /** * Retrieves the value associated with a key. If the key does not * exist, null is returned. This method is designed to integrate * seamlessly with caching mechanisms, enabling fast lookups. */ async get(key: string): Promise<unknown null> { return await this._withTransaction('readonly', (store) => this._promisifyRequest(store.get(key)).then((result) => result ? (result as { key: string; value: unknown }).value : null ) ); } /** * Fetches all key-value pairs from the store. Returns an object * mapping keys to their values, making it suitable for bulk * operations or syncing with in-memory caches. */ async getAll(): Promise<record unknown>> { return await this._withTransaction('readonly', (store) => this._promisifyRequest(store.getAll()).then((results) => results.reduce((acc: Record<string unknown>, item: { key: string; value: unknown }) => { acc[item.key] = item.value; return acc; }, {}) ) ); } /** * Deletes a key-value pair by its key. This method is crucial * for managing cache size and removing expired entries. The * `readwrite` mode is used to ensure proper deletion. */ async delete(key: string): Promise<void> { await this._withTransaction('readwrite', (store) => store.delete(key)); } /** * Clears all entries from the store. This method is ideal for * scenarios where the entire cache needs to be invalidated, such * as during application updates or environment resets. */ async clear(): Promise<void> { await this._withTransaction('readwrite', (store) => store.clear()); } /** * Handles transactions in a reusable way. Ensures the database * is connected and abstracts the transaction logic. By * centralizing transaction handling, this method reduces * boilerplate code and ensures consistency across all operations. */ private async _withTransaction<t>( mode: IDBTransactionMode, callback: (store: IDBObjectStore) => IDBRequest | Promise<t> ): Promise<t> { if (!this.db) throw new Error('IndexedDB is not connected'); const transaction = this.db.transaction([this.storeName], mode); const store = transaction.objectStore(this.storeName); const result = callback(store); return result instanceof IDBRequest ? await this._promisifyRequest(result) : await result; } /** * Converts IndexedDB request events into Promises, allowing for * cleaner and more modern asynchronous handling. This is * essential for making IndexedDB operations fit seamlessly into * the Promise-based architecture of JavaScript applications. */ private async _promisifyRequest<t>(request: IDBRequest): Promise<t> { return await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { request.onsuccess = () => resolve(request.result as T); request.onerror = () => reject(request.error); }); } } </t></t></t></t></t></void></void></string></record></unknown></void></void>
Integrating the Adapter into the Cache
The cache accepts an optional StorageAdapter. If provided, it initializes the database connection, loads data into memory, and keeps the cache and storage in sync.
private constructor(capacity: number, storageAdapter?: StorageAdapter) { this.capacity = capacity; this.storageAdapter = storageAdapter; if (this.storageAdapter) { this.storageAdapter.connect().catch((error) => { throw new Error(error); }); this.storageAdapter.getAll().then((data) => { for (const key in data) { this.put(key, data[key] as T); } }).catch((error) => { throw new Error(error); }); } this.hash = new Map(); this.head = this.tail = undefined; this.hitCount = this.missCount = this.evictionCount = 0; }
Why Adapter and Strategy Patterns?
Using the Adapter pattern:
- Decouples the cache from specific storage mechanisms.
- Ensures extensibility for new storage backends.
Combining with the Strategy pattern:
- Enables runtime selection of the persistence layer.
- Simplifies testing by mocking different adapters.
Key Design Practices
- Abstract API: Keeps the cache logic agnostic of storage details.
- Singleton Cache: Ensures shared state consistency.
- Async Initialization: Avoids blocking operations during setup.
- Lazy Loading: Only loads persisted data when a storage adapter is provided.
Next Steps
This design is robust but leaves room for enhancements:
- Optimize sync logic for better performance.
- Experiment with additional adapters like Redis or SQLite.
Try It Out! ?
If you’d like to test the cache in action, it’s available as an npm package: adev-lru. You can also explore the full source code on GitHub: adev-lru repository. I welcome any recommendations, constructive feedback, or contributions to make it even better! ?
Happy coding! ?
The above is the detailed content of Enhancing LRU Cache with Configurable Data Persistence. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
