I've always had a love-hate relationship with JavaScript's error handling. Its reliance on try-catch blocks and throwing exceptions might work for others, but it definitely frustrates me sometimes.
Consider this typical JavaScript error handling pattern:
async function fetchData(url) { try { const response = await fetch(url); if (!response.ok) { throw new Error(`HTTP error! Status: ${response.status}`); } const data = await response.json(); console.log(data); } catch (error) { console.error("Error fetching data:", error.message); } }
That's a lot of code and we still don't know the type of the error.
My opinion is that when dealing with errors, you want to know what caused the error, where it came from, and what type of error it is and handle it right away. Especially when you're in a server environment. For me
The golang way
I prefer to handle errors like how golang handles them, basically error as values.
data, err := getData() if err != nil { // handle error }
This way you handle the error right away and you don't have to worry about the rest of the code running if there's an error.
Supabase does the same thing with their supabase-js library.
const { data, error } = await supabase.from("users").select("*"); if (error) { // handle error }
Graceful Error Handling with Hono RPC
Let us talk about the main star of the show
const onSubmit = async (data: SignUpSchema) => { const res = await callRpc(api.auth.signup.$post({ json: data })); if (res.error) { toast.error(res.error); return; } toast.success("Account created successfully"); router.navigate({ to: "/" }); };
This function might not look much, but it provides type-safe JSON parameters via RPC. It handles all errors and returns an object containing either data or error, with the data type inferred from the RPC definition based on the endpoint's return type.
Setting up the graceful error handling
Setup Hono Rpc using the official documentation
Setting up the Hono error handler
The backend should always return a text response with the error message and status code.
export const errorHandler = (err: Error | HTTPException, c: Context) => { console.log("=== Caught Error ==="); if (err instanceof HTTPException) { return c.text(err.message, err.status); } if (err instanceof z.ZodError) { return c.text(err.errors.map((err) => err.message).join(",\n"), 400); } console.error(err); return c.text("Something went wrong", 500); }; // Add as a errorHandler on the Hono instance const app = new Hono(); app.onError(errorHandler);
Based on the Hono's documentation you should throw HTTPException like this
import { HTTPException } from "hono/http-exception"; app.post("/", async (c, next) => { if (somethingWentWrong) { throw new HTTPException(401, { message: "Custom error message" }); } return c.json({ message: "Success" }); });
Now we know that if there's an error, we will always receive a text response with the error message and status code.
3. Setting up the error handler in the frontend
import { ClientResponse, hc } from "hono/client"; import type { ApiRoutes } from "../../../backend/app"; const client = hc<apiroutes>("/"); export const callRpc = async <t>( rpc: Promise<clientresponse>> ): Promise => { try { const data = await rpc; if (!data.ok) { const res = await data.text(); return { data: null, error: res }; } const res = await data.json(); return { data: res as T, error: null }; } catch (error) { return { data: null, error: (error as Error).message }; } }; export default client.api; </clientresponse></t></apiroutes>
callRpc will automatically infer the type of the data based on the RPC definition and return an object containing either data or error.
4. Usage
Everything is typesafe from what you send to what you receive
const onSubmit = async (data: SignUpSchema) => { const res = await callRpc(api.auth.signup.$post({ json: data })); if (res.error) { toast.error(res.error); return; } toast.success("Account created successfully"); router.navigate({ to: "/" }); };
I have been working in a codebase where it is set up like this and it is the smoothest developer experience I have had. I'm just here to share it.
Drawbacks
- The backend is limited to returning text for errors and JSON for success responses
- Doing this pattern shifts away from the idiomatic way of handling errors in javascript
- You have to handle the error right away, which might not be what you want
The above is the detailed content of Elegant Error Handling and End to End typesafety with Hono RPC. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

SecLists
SecLists is the ultimate security tester's companion. It is a collection of various types of lists that are frequently used during security assessments, all in one place. SecLists helps make security testing more efficient and productive by conveniently providing all the lists a security tester might need. List types include usernames, passwords, URLs, fuzzing payloads, sensitive data patterns, web shells, and more. The tester can simply pull this repository onto a new test machine and he will have access to every type of list he needs.

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
