Home >Backend Development >C++ >Why Use `static_cast` Over Traditional C-Style Casting in C ?
Traditional C-style casting techniques, such as simple function-style casting or casting using C-style syntax, often fail to distinguish between different types of casting operations. This can lead to confusion and potential errors. static_cast
static_cast performs a safe conversion between types that are related by assignment or inheritance. It is safe when a valid conversion exists or when there is an appropriate constructor to make the conversion possible. In contrast, a reinterpret_cast or const_cast is always dangerous and requires the programmer to explicitly assure the compiler that they know what they are doing.
Consider the following example:
class CDerivedClass : public CMyBase {...}; class CMyOtherStuff {...} ; CMyBase *pSomething; // filled somewhere
The following two casts are compiled identically and are both safe:
CDerivedClass *pMyObject; pMyObject = static_cast<CDerivedClass*>(pSomething); pMyObject = (CDerivedClass*)pSomething;
However, when casting to a type that is not related, static_cast will generate a compiler error, while traditional casting will not:
CMyOtherStuff *pOther; // Compiler error: Can't convert pOther = static_cast<CMyOtherStuff*>(pSomething); // No compiler error, but dangerous pOther = (CMyOtherStuff*)pSomething;
Traditional C-style casts are also harder to read and locate in code, especially in complex expressions. In comparison, static_cast and other modern casting syntax are easier to identify, making it simpler to ensure their correctness. This can be especially useful for automated code analysis tools.
By using static_cast
The above is the detailed content of Why Use `static_cast` Over Traditional C-Style Casting in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!