The most basic way of annotating a function in typescript is like this
function add(a: number, b: number): number{ // logic } // or const add = (a: number, b: number): number => { //logic }
optional parameters are annotated with question marks param? like this
function optional(a: number, b?: number){ console.log(a) }
But what about callback functions, or functions where the type of the arguments and the return types are related (in that case, generic).
Function Values
Observe this JavaScript function
function multiplier(factor){ return value => factor * value }
so that we can use the function like this;
const n = multiplier(6) n(8) // 48
Function values are annotated in typescript like this
(param1: type, param2: type)=> type // or const add: (a: number, b: number)=> number = function (a, b){ return a + b }
So to annotate the multiplier function, we have
function multiplier(factor: number): (value: number) => number{ return value => factor * value }
Your IDE (preferably) VSCode, will automatically infer the type of value (to be number) in the function logic
Generic functions
This function annotation is wrong
function pickFirst(array: Array<t>): T{ return array[0] } </t>
Naturally this throws an error that
Cannot find name T
therefore, the format of annotating generic functions is
function fnName <t>(param: T): U{ //logic } </t>
Observe where the generic names were declared. so, to correctly annotate the function above;
function pickFirst<t>(array: Array<t>): T{ return array[0] } </t></t>
Now that works.
But what about Generic functions that have function parameters.
For instance, we want to annotate a custom map function named myMap which was written like this in Javascript
function myMap(arr, fn){ rreturn arr.map(fn) }
We can annotate it like this
function myMap<input output>(arr: Input[], fn: (item: Input, index?: number) => Output): Output[]{ return arr.map(fn) }
What we should note in the snippet above is that the fn function takes an item of the same type of the Input array and returns an Output type.
What about the static Array.from() method?
function myFrom<type>(iterable: Iterable<type>): Array<type>{ // logic } </type></type></type>
or the array.filter() method?
function myFilter<input>(arr: Input[], fn: (item: Input) => boolean): Input[]{ return arr.filter(fn) }
Generic constraints
You can also constrain generic variables to types that have a particular property. For instance,
function pickInnerFirst<t extends number>(array: Array<t>): T{ return array[0][0] } </t></t>
This function picks the very first element in a 2 dimensional array
This ensures that it only works for arrays and strings (mostly) in such a way that
pickOne([12, 20, 30]) // wont work.
We can also use interfaces
interface Lengthly{ length: number; } function pickInnerFirst<t extends lengthly>(array: Array<t>): T{ return array[0][0] } </t></t>
Function Interfaces
In case you don't know, Functions are objects and they have properties
const add = (a, b) => a + b console.log(add.toString()) //(a, b) => a + b // also console.log(Object.getPrototypeOf(add) == Function.prototype) //true console.log(Object.getPrototypeOf(Function.prototype) == Object.prototype) //true
The second example indicated that the add function is a child of Object.prototype (even though its not a direct child) and therefore is an object.
Funny enough, you can attach properties to a function in JavaScript
function add(a: number, b: number): number{ // logic } // or const add = (a: number, b: number): number => { //logic }
This snippet will return
function optional(a: number, b?: number){ console.log(a) }
Observe that at A we attached a property called description to the function which can only be possible with objects.
That is to conclude that;
Objects can be described with interfaces (normally). For functions, this is also possible. however, it is only something you should consider when you are adding special properties to your functions.
function multiplier(factor){ return value => factor * value }
At comment A is where we describe the arguments and return types of the function.
So, to annotate the earlier code in typescript,
const n = multiplier(6) n(8) // 48
Observe the way we used the interface in the shout function at A.
Why should I understand how to annotate functions in Typescript?
Well, it helps in building a much smarter type system which in turn reduces your chances of bugs. If you are building a library or a framework, you might have to use some or most of the concepts mentioned here.
If you are just using libraries, these concepts are not really necessary, even though they can give you a much deeper understanding of the libraries you are working with.
If you have any questions or there are mistakes in this writing, feel free to share them in the comments below ⭐
The above is the detailed content of Annotating Functions in Typescript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
