Left Packing Problem
Consider the scenario where there's an input array and an output array, but only certain elements satisfying a condition need to be written to the output array. What is the most efficient approach to achieve this using AVX2?
SSE Approach
The SSE approach involves using _mm_movemask_ps to extract a 4-bit mask from the input mask, and then using this mask to generate a shuffle control data with _mm_load_si128. Finally, _mm_shuffle_epi8 is employed to permute the values to align valid elements at the front of the SIMD register. This approach works well for 4-wide SSE vectors with a 16-entry look-up table (LUT).
AVX Limitations
However, for 8-wide AVX vectors, the LUT would require a significantly larger number of entries (256), each with 32 bytes, resulting in 8k of memory usage. It is surprising that AVX does not offer an instruction to simplify this process, such as a masked store with packing.
AVX2 Solution
Despite the lack of a dedicated instruction, it is possible to achieve efficient left packing in AVX2 using a combination of techniques:
- Use vpermps for variable-shuffle: _mm256_permutevar8x32_ps can be used to perform a lane-crossing variable-shuffle, allowing the data to be packed based on the mask.
- Generate masks on the fly: BMI2 provides the pext (Parallel Bits Extract) instruction, which can be used to extract bits from the input mask and generate the shuffle control data.
- Avoid pdep/pext on AMD CPUs: AMD CPUs before Zen 3 have significantly higher latency for pdep and pext, so alternative approaches may be necessary for optimal performance.
Algorithm
The algorithm for left packing in AVX2 involves the following steps:
- Extract indices from the input mask using pext.
- Unpack the indices to generate a shuffle mask.
- Use vpermps to shuffle the input data according to the shuffle mask.
Conclusion
This approach provides a highly efficient solution for left packing in AVX2. By utilizing vpermps, pext, and other BMI2 instructions, it is possible to pack data based on a mask with minimal overhead and latency.
The above is the detailed content of How Can AVX2 Be Used Most Efficiently for Left Packing with a Mask?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, performance and application scenarios. 1) The C# syntax is more concise, supports garbage collection, and is suitable for .NET framework development. 2) C has higher performance and requires manual memory management, which is often used in system programming and game development.

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

MinGW - Minimalist GNU for Windows
This project is in the process of being migrated to osdn.net/projects/mingw, you can continue to follow us there. MinGW: A native Windows port of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), freely distributable import libraries and header files for building native Windows applications; includes extensions to the MSVC runtime to support C99 functionality. All MinGW software can run on 64-bit Windows platforms.

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software