When is .then(success, fail) Considered an Antipattern for Promises?
The .then(success, fail) syntax in promises can be seen as an antipattern in some cases. Let's explore the reasons and compare it with the .then().catch() approach.
Control Flow Differences
.then(success, fail) returns a promise that rejects if the callback function throws an error. Thus, if the success logger fails, the error will be passed to the subsequent .catch() handler, not the fail callback.
Antipattern Scenario
In the following scenario, using .then(success, fail) becomes problematic:
some_promise_call() .then(function(res) { logger.log(res) }, function(err) { logger.log(err) })
If the success logging function fails, the error won't be caught by the fail callback, but by the next .catch() handler in the chain. This can disrupt the intended error handling logic.
Prefer .then().catch()
Instead, the recommended approach is to use .then() and .catch() separately:
some_promise_call() .then(function(res) { logger.log(res) }) .catch(function(err) { logger.log(err) })
In this case, the .catch() handler will also catch any errors thrown by the success logging function. This ensures all errors are handled in a consistent manner.
Exception Handling Intent
While the .then().catch() syntax provides better error handling, the .then(success, fail) antipattern can be useful in situations where you want to:
- Handle errors specifically in a given step.
- Take different actions based on whether an error occurred or not.
However, it's important to remember that this pattern introduces branching into the control flow, which may not be desirable in certain circumstances.
Alternative Options
Instead of .then(success, fail), the .done() or .finally() methods can be used to handle completion or errors consistently.
// Handle errors and completion together some_promise_call() .catch(function(e) { return e; // it's OK, we'll just log it }) .done(function(res) { logger.log(res); }); // Handle completion always, regardless of errors some_promise_call() .finally(function() { logger.log('Promise completed'); });
The above is the detailed content of When is `then(success, fail)` an Antipattern for Promises?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SAP NetWeaver Server Adapter for Eclipse
Integrate Eclipse with SAP NetWeaver application server.
