Home >Backend Development >C++ >How Do Rvalue References and Move Semantics Impact C 11 Return Statements?
C 11 introduced rvalue references and move semantics to enhance performance by avoiding unnecessary copies and optimizing object creation. Understanding the differences between these techniques is crucial for writing efficient code.
Consider the following C 11 code examples:
First Example:
std::vector<int> return_vector() { std::vector<int> tmp {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; return tmp; } std::vector<int> &&rval_ref = return_vector();
Second Example:
std::vector<int>&& return_vector() { std::vector<int> tmp {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; return std::move(tmp); } std::vector<int> &&rval_ref = return_vector();
Third Example:
std::vector<int> return_vector() { std::vector<int> tmp {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; return std::move(tmp); } std::vector<int> &&rval_ref = return_vector();
First Example:
Second Example:
Third Example:
The recommended way to return a temporary object as a move-only lvalue reference (e.g., std::vector
std::vector<int> return_vector() { std::vector<int> tmp {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}; return tmp; } std::vector<int> rval_ref = return_vector();
This approach provides the best combination of performance and correctness.
The above is the detailed content of How Do Rvalue References and Move Semantics Impact C 11 Return Statements?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!