Home >Backend Development >C++ >When Do `std::unique_ptr` and `std::shared_ptr` Require a Complete Definition of T?
Is std::unique_ptr
In C programming, the behavior of templates within the standard library often depends on the completeness of the types they instantiate. While most templates require complete types, std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr are exceptions.
std::unique_ptr and Incomplete Types
std::unique_ptr allows incomplete types in certain contexts, but not all. Specifically, it requires a complete type when:
Otherwise, it can work with incomplete types, such as for:
std::shared_ptr and Incomplete Types
std::shared_ptr follows similar rules as std::unique_ptr, but with two key differences:
It requires a complete type when:
Implications for Implementation
These completeness requirements mean that different implementations of std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr may handle incomplete types differently. For example, the Visual Studio 2010-SP1 implementation may require a complete definition of the type T to instantiate std::unique_ptr
Standard Requirements
The standard for std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr does not explicitly state that they cannot work with incomplete types. However, the requirements on their behavior under certain circumstances imply that a complete type is necessary. This is explained in the C Standard, which states that the validity of certain operations depends on the completeness of the type instantiated with the template.
In conclusion, while std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr allow incomplete types in specific contexts, they require complete types for certain operations. This requirement stems from the standard's specifications and may impact the behavior of the templates in different implementations.
The above is the detailed content of When Do `std::unique_ptr` and `std::shared_ptr` Require a Complete Definition of T?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!