


Direct vs. Delegated Event Handling in jQuery: Which `.on()` Approach Should You Choose?
Delegating Event Handling in jQuery: Direct vs. Delegated .on()
The jQuery .on() method allows for registering event handlers on DOM elements. Two distinct approaches to event handling are direct and delegated binding. The direct binding directly attaches event handlers to specific elements, while delegated binding allows event handling on elements that match a selector within a parent element.
The last sentence of the given paragraph regarding delegated event handlers states that jQuery "runs the handler for any elements...matching the selector." This refers to the event bubbling mechanism in DOM.
When a delegated event handler is attached to a parent element using .on() with a selector, events are handled not only on the selected elements but also on their descendants that match the selector. As the event bubbles up the DOM tree, jQuery checks if any elements along the path match the selector and triggers the handler if a match is found.
To illustrate the difference, consider the following examples:
$("div#target span.green").on("click", function() { alert($(this).attr("class") + " is clicked"); });
This directly binds the click handler to all elements with the green class within the #target div. Each of these elements will independently handle click events.
In contrast, the following uses delegated binding:
$("div#target").on("click", "span.green", function() { alert($(this).attr("class") + " is clicked"); });
Here, the click event handler is attached to the #target div, but the selector "event bubbling" to elements matching "green." This means that any future elements with the "green" class created within the #target div will also trigger the click handler.
Delegated binding is particularly useful when dynamically adding and removing elements from the page, as it ensures that new elements inherit the event handling behavior without requiring manual binding.
The above is the detailed content of Direct vs. Delegated Event Handling in jQuery: Which `.on()` Approach Should You Choose?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
