


How Can We Profile Function Exit Time in Embedded Systems with Limited Profiling Support?
Capturing Function Exit Time with __gnu_mcount_nc
Embedded platform profiling often encounters limited support, including unavailable implementations for performance analysis tools. Understanding how to profile function exit time despite only having access to entry information can be challenging.
GCC's -pg flag inserts hooks to __gnu_mcount_nc at the start of each function, providing entry timing data. However, without exit point hooks, it's difficult to determine the time spent within function bodies.
A common approach involves maintaining a shadow callstack and modifying return addresses to trigger exit hooks. This method, while effective, has limitations, particularly in multithreaded environments and with recursion.
Alternative Profiling Approach
Existing profiling tools like gprof don't collect exit timing directly. Instead, they rely on self-time estimation and caller-callee count information to approximate function costs. This approach has limitations in terms of accuracy and overhead.
Stack-Sampling
A more efficient and flexible approach is stack-sampling. Rather than counting PC samples, stack-sampling captures a snapshot of the call stack at random intervals. This allows for more precise estimation of function self-time without the overhead associated with PC-sampling.
Stack-sampling techniques can reveal valuable insights into not only function costs but also the underlying reasons for those costs. It highlights problem areas that may not be evident in call graphs or hot-spots.
Limitations of Visualization
While flame graphs and other visual representations can aid in profiling analysis, it's important to recognize their limitations. They may not clearly expose functions that contribute significantly to performance due to being called multiple times from different locations.
Key Points
- gprof does not profile exit timing using __gnu_mcount_nc.
- Stack-sampling provides a more robust alternative for estimating function self-time.
- Analysis of raw stack samples is valuable for identifying performance bottlenecks.
- Visualizations can be misleading, so it's crucial to focus on uncovering hidden issues.
The above is the detailed content of How Can We Profile Function Exit Time in Embedded Systems with Limited Profiling Support?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

There are significant differences in how C# and C implement and features in object-oriented programming (OOP). 1) The class definition and syntax of C# are more concise and support advanced features such as LINQ. 2) C provides finer granular control, suitable for system programming and high performance needs. Both have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on the specific application scenario.

Converting from XML to C and performing data operations can be achieved through the following steps: 1) parsing XML files using tinyxml2 library, 2) mapping data into C's data structure, 3) using C standard library such as std::vector for data operations. Through these steps, data converted from XML can be processed and manipulated efficiently.

C# uses automatic garbage collection mechanism, while C uses manual memory management. 1. C#'s garbage collector automatically manages memory to reduce the risk of memory leakage, but may lead to performance degradation. 2.C provides flexible memory control, suitable for applications that require fine management, but should be handled with caution to avoid memory leakage.

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.

C Learners and developers can get resources and support from StackOverflow, Reddit's r/cpp community, Coursera and edX courses, open source projects on GitHub, professional consulting services, and CppCon. 1. StackOverflow provides answers to technical questions; 2. Reddit's r/cpp community shares the latest news; 3. Coursera and edX provide formal C courses; 4. Open source projects on GitHub such as LLVM and Boost improve skills; 5. Professional consulting services such as JetBrains and Perforce provide technical support; 6. CppCon and other conferences help careers

C# is suitable for projects that require high development efficiency and cross-platform support, while C is suitable for applications that require high performance and underlying control. 1) C# simplifies development, provides garbage collection and rich class libraries, suitable for enterprise-level applications. 2)C allows direct memory operation, suitable for game development and high-performance computing.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Atom editor mac version download
The most popular open source editor