


How to Efficiently Implement a 64-Bit Atomic Counter Using Only 32-Bit Atomics?
Implementing a 64-Bit Atomic Counter Using 32-Bit Atomics
In embedded systems, creating a 64-bit atomic counter using only 32-bit atomics is often necessary. A common approach is to leverage a generation count with the least significant bit serving as a read lock. However, the question arises whether there are other potential methods and whether the suggested implementation is optimal.
Alternative Approaches
The recommended implementation is a viable approach, but there are alternative methods to consider:
- SeqLock Pattern: This technique utilizes a monotonically increasing generation count with alternating odd and even values. Readers spin until the generation count is stable and the read lock bit (least significant bit) is unset. This method offers improved performance in scenarios with multiple readers but only a single writer.
- Direct 64-Bit Atomic Operations: While less common, some systems may support 64-bit atomic operations natively. In such cases, using atomic operations directly for both halves of the 64-bit counter can eliminate the need for locks or sequence counters.
Design Considerations
Regarding the provided implementation, there are a few areas that can be optimized:
- Atomic Read-Modify-Write (RMW) for Generation Count: Instead of using atomic RMW operations for the generation count, it's possible to employ pure loads and stores with release ordering. This change reduces the overhead associated with RMW operations.
- Atomic Increment for Payload: It's unnecessary to utilize atomic RMW for incrementing the payload; pure loads, increments, and stores suffice. This modification further reduces the overhead of maintaining the counter.
Additional Considerations
- ARM Load-Pair Instructions: Some ARM architectures support efficient load-pair instructions (e.g., ldrd or ldp) that can simultaneously load both 32-bit halves of a 64-bit value. Taking advantage of these instructions can enhance performance.
- Compiler Optimizations: Compilers may not always generate optimal code for atomic operations on large structures like uint64_t. Avoiding atomic access to such structures and instead using volatile keyword and memory barriers can result in more efficient code.
Conclusion
The suggested technique for constructing a 64-bit atomic counter using 32-bit atomics is appropriate, especially in scenarios with a single writer and multiple readers. However, other options like the SeqLock pattern or direct 64-bit atomic operations may be more suitable in specific situations. By addressing the outlined design considerations and exploring additional optimizations, programmers can further improve the efficiency of their implementations.
The above is the detailed content of How to Efficiently Implement a 64-Bit Atomic Counter Using Only 32-Bit Atomics?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.

The choice of C XML framework should be based on project requirements. 1) TinyXML is suitable for resource-constrained environments, 2) pugixml is suitable for high-performance requirements, 3) Xerces-C supports complex XMLSchema verification, and performance, ease of use and licenses must be considered when choosing.

C# is suitable for projects that require development efficiency and type safety, while C is suitable for projects that require high performance and hardware control. 1) C# provides garbage collection and LINQ, suitable for enterprise applications and Windows development. 2)C is known for its high performance and underlying control, and is widely used in gaming and system programming.

C code optimization can be achieved through the following strategies: 1. Manually manage memory for optimization use; 2. Write code that complies with compiler optimization rules; 3. Select appropriate algorithms and data structures; 4. Use inline functions to reduce call overhead; 5. Apply template metaprogramming to optimize at compile time; 6. Avoid unnecessary copying, use moving semantics and reference parameters; 7. Use const correctly to help compiler optimization; 8. Select appropriate data structures, such as std::vector.

The volatile keyword in C is used to inform the compiler that the value of the variable may be changed outside of code control and therefore cannot be optimized. 1) It is often used to read variables that may be modified by hardware or interrupt service programs, such as sensor state. 2) Volatile cannot guarantee multi-thread safety, and should use mutex locks or atomic operations. 3) Using volatile may cause performance slight to decrease, but ensure program correctness.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

ZendStudio 13.5.1 Mac
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

MantisBT
Mantis is an easy-to-deploy web-based defect tracking tool designed to aid in product defect tracking. It requires PHP, MySQL and a web server. Check out our demo and hosting services.

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
