Redundant Atomic Writes Optimization
Why do compilers refrain from merging consecutive writes of the same value to a single atomic variable? Let's delve into this issue and uncover the underlying reasons.
The "As-If" Rule
According to the C standards, compilers are permitted to coalesce multiple atomic writes into a single operation. Even when these writes involve different values, the resulting behavior is still allowed to adhere to the "as-if" rule. This rule implies that the execution of the optimized code has the same observable effects as the original sequence of writes.
Compiler Behavior vs. Hardware Constraints
Despite being theoretically possible, compilers generally do not perform this optimization in practice. The primary reason for this is to avoid undesirable effects on performance and behavior when targeting real hardware.
Progress Bars and Other Examples
Consider the example of a progress bar. Optimizing multiple atomic writes to a single operation could lead to a situation where the progress bar stays at 0 and then abruptly jumps to 100%, potentially misleading users. Other scenarios where such optimization would be problematic include avoiding useless shared_ptr ref count increments and decrements in a loop.
Principle of Least Surprise
Programmers expect atomic writes to manifest in memory for every source store operation. Coalescing multiple writes violates this expectation, leading to potential confusion and incorrect behavior.
Quality-of-Implementation Issues
Compilers have difficulty determining when it is safe to optimize atomic writes without violating ordering rules and affecting other aspects of the program.
Future Optimizations and API Extensions
Discussions are ongoing within the C working group to extend the std::atomic API and provide programmers with finer control over optimization. This will enable compilers to perform optimizations where appropriate while ensuring the integrity and clarity of program behavior.
In the meantime, using volatile atomic or considering alternative implementations, such as shared_ptr_unsynchronized, can help avoid undesired optimization effects.
The above is the detailed content of Why Don't Compilers Merge Consecutive Atomic Writes?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

The main differences between C# and C are syntax, memory management and performance: 1) C# syntax is modern, supports lambda and LINQ, and C retains C features and supports templates. 2) C# automatically manages memory, C needs to be managed manually. 3) C performance is better than C#, but C# performance is also being optimized.

You can use the TinyXML, Pugixml, or libxml2 libraries to process XML data in C. 1) Parse XML files: Use DOM or SAX methods, DOM is suitable for small files, and SAX is suitable for large files. 2) Generate XML file: convert the data structure into XML format and write to the file. Through these steps, XML data can be effectively managed and manipulated.

Working with XML data structures in C can use the TinyXML or pugixml library. 1) Use the pugixml library to parse and generate XML files. 2) Handle complex nested XML elements, such as book information. 3) Optimize XML processing code, and it is recommended to use efficient libraries and streaming parsing. Through these steps, XML data can be processed efficiently.

C still dominates performance optimization because its low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it indispensable in game development, financial transaction systems and embedded systems. Specifically, it is manifested as: 1) In game development, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it the preferred language for game engine development; 2) In financial transaction systems, C's performance advantages ensure extremely low latency and high throughput; 3) In embedded systems, C's low-level memory management and efficient execution capabilities make it very popular in resource-constrained environments.

The choice of C XML framework should be based on project requirements. 1) TinyXML is suitable for resource-constrained environments, 2) pugixml is suitable for high-performance requirements, 3) Xerces-C supports complex XMLSchema verification, and performance, ease of use and licenses must be considered when choosing.

C# is suitable for projects that require development efficiency and type safety, while C is suitable for projects that require high performance and hardware control. 1) C# provides garbage collection and LINQ, suitable for enterprise applications and Windows development. 2)C is known for its high performance and underlying control, and is widely used in gaming and system programming.

C code optimization can be achieved through the following strategies: 1. Manually manage memory for optimization use; 2. Write code that complies with compiler optimization rules; 3. Select appropriate algorithms and data structures; 4. Use inline functions to reduce call overhead; 5. Apply template metaprogramming to optimize at compile time; 6. Avoid unnecessary copying, use moving semantics and reference parameters; 7. Use const correctly to help compiler optimization; 8. Select appropriate data structures, such as std::vector.

The volatile keyword in C is used to inform the compiler that the value of the variable may be changed outside of code control and therefore cannot be optimized. 1) It is often used to read variables that may be modified by hardware or interrupt service programs, such as sensor state. 2) Volatile cannot guarantee multi-thread safety, and should use mutex locks or atomic operations. 3) Using volatile may cause performance slight to decrease, but ensure program correctness.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 Linux new version
SublimeText3 Linux latest version

Safe Exam Browser
Safe Exam Browser is a secure browser environment for taking online exams securely. This software turns any computer into a secure workstation. It controls access to any utility and prevents students from using unauthorized resources.

WebStorm Mac version
Useful JavaScript development tools

VSCode Windows 64-bit Download
A free and powerful IDE editor launched by Microsoft

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
