Home >Java >javaTutorial >How Do C#, Java Generics, and C Templates Compare in Performance, Flexibility, and Compatibility?
Comparative Analysis of Generics in C#, Java, and Templates in C
C# Generics
C# generics enable the declaration of type-safe collections, such as:
List<Person> foo = new List<Person>();
Behind the scenes, C# compiles a specialized List
Java Generics
Java generics operate similarly to C# generics:
ArrayList<Person> foo = new ArrayList<Person>();
However, Java utilizes "type erasure," where the type information is removed at runtime. This approach maintains compatibility with older code but may hinder performance due to the necessary casting and reduced visibility of type information through reflection.
C Templates
C templates facilitate the creation of generic code without relying on a virtual machine. Unlike C# and Java, these templates generate optimized machine code without the overhead of a runtime system. They offer unlimited flexibility to define templates with arbitrary constraints and support operations such as:
std::list<Person>* foo = new std::list<Person>(); string addNames<T>(T first, T second) { return first + second; } // Assuming T has the + operator
C templates provide the greatest flexibility and performance among the discussed approaches.
Pros and Cons
C# Generics
Pros:
Cons:
Java Generics
Pros:
Cons:
C Templates
Pros:
Cons:
The above is the detailed content of How Do C#, Java Generics, and C Templates Compare in Performance, Flexibility, and Compatibility?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!