


Text compression & Code splitting & Modern image formats - Performance optimization
I tried the following to optimize my side project performance:
- text compression
- code splitting
- modern image formats.
Profiler
The app I built used Vite with pnpm. Modern web build tools automatically optimize web performance by default in the build process. So we can pnpm run build then pnpm dlx serve dist. Then use Lighthouse of Chrome DevTools as a guide to address each bottleneck it lists.
Enable text compression
It affects FCP and LCP.
The first thing that Lighthouse suggests is compressing text using algorithms like br or gzip.
The common practice is to add Accept-Encoding: gzip whenever making web requests. Since the app I am building serves the resource locally, I installed the vite-plugin-compress to compress the files.
Step 1: install vite-plugin-compress
Step 2: configure the vite.config.js file, and add the plugin and some parameters. As Google Developers suggests, it should use br(brotliCompress) over gzip as much as possible.
For example
viteCompression({ verbose: true, disable: false, algorithm: 'brotliCompress', ext: '.br', }),
Step 3: run pnpm run build to compress
It successfully compressed .js and .css files.
Logs:
✨ [vite-plugin-compression]:algorithm=brotliCompress - compressed file successfully.
Vite would compress the file by default using .gzip, but brotliCompress can do better, compression during the build process:
Vite with gzip
vite v5.4.10 building for production...
✓ 654 modules transformed.index-B9QUW17e.css 8.60 kB │ gzip: 2.33 kB
PauseMenu-DjZ95K-6.js 1.77 kB │ gzip: 0.62 kB
index-ohAKp9W9.js 1,688.05 kB │ gzip: 454.20 kBVite-plugin-compression with br
✨ [vite-plugin-compression]:algorithm=brotliCompress - compressed file successfully:
PauseMenu-DjZ95K-6.js.br 1.73kb / brotliCompress: 0.51kb
index-B9QUW17e.css.br 8.40kb / brotliCompress: 1.97kb
index-ohAKp9W9.js.br 1648.49kb / brotliCompress: 345.30kb
Reducing unused JavaScript
It affects FCP and LCP.
Use the Coverage Tab in Google DevTools to see the scripts that have unused bytes over 20kbs.
Since I am using Vite with React, code splitting is the first thing about reducing unused JavaScript.
In React,
- Use
to wrap the whole App and provide a fallback UI, like Loading, this provides a fallback UI when the app is loading. - Use lazy() to wrap the components which not used on the initial page. For example, for games, when users press down the Esc key, a menu that you can wrap up pops up.
Serve images with modern formats
Chrome Developers suggests serving images in AVIF or WebP format. I chose WebP because it has more support across browsers.
The latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Opera support WebP, while AVIF support is more limited.
You can check WebP image format support info at Can I use.
You can install the cwebp library at WebP and use the command cwebp -q 50 images/flower1.jpg -o images/flower1.webp to convert .png to .webp.
This command converts, at a quality of 50 (0 is the worst; 100 is the best), the images/flower1.jpg file and saves it as images/flower1.webp.
The compression result is quite impressive. One of the files is reduced in size from 3.5 MB to 178kb. Even the low information intensity ones give 4x compression.
We can even write a simple .bat script to automatically convert all the .png images under the target folder into .webp images.
viteCompression({ verbose: true, disable: false, algorithm: 'brotliCompress', ext: '.br', }),
Reference
- Remove unused JavaScript
- View used and unused CSS with the Coverage tab.
- Serve images in modern formats.
- Creating WebP Images with the Command Line
- Precompiled Utilities
- WebP image format - Can I Use
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
The above is the detailed content of Text compression & Code splitting & Modern image formats - Performance optimization. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

JavaScript core data types are consistent in browsers and Node.js, but are handled differently from the extra types. 1) The global object is window in the browser and global in Node.js. 2) Node.js' unique Buffer object, used to process binary data. 3) There are also differences in performance and time processing, and the code needs to be adjusted according to the environment.

JavaScriptusestwotypesofcomments:single-line(//)andmulti-line(//).1)Use//forquicknotesorsingle-lineexplanations.2)Use//forlongerexplanationsorcommentingoutblocksofcode.Commentsshouldexplainthe'why',notthe'what',andbeplacedabovetherelevantcodeforclari

The main difference between Python and JavaScript is the type system and application scenarios. 1. Python uses dynamic types, suitable for scientific computing and data analysis. 2. JavaScript adopts weak types and is widely used in front-end and full-stack development. The two have their own advantages in asynchronous programming and performance optimization, and should be decided according to project requirements when choosing.

Whether to choose Python or JavaScript depends on the project type: 1) Choose Python for data science and automation tasks; 2) Choose JavaScript for front-end and full-stack development. Python is favored for its powerful library in data processing and automation, while JavaScript is indispensable for its advantages in web interaction and full-stack development.

Python and JavaScript each have their own advantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1. Python is easy to learn, with concise syntax, suitable for data science and back-end development, but has a slow execution speed. 2. JavaScript is everywhere in front-end development and has strong asynchronous programming capabilities. Node.js makes it suitable for full-stack development, but the syntax may be complex and error-prone.

JavaScriptisnotbuiltonCorC ;it'saninterpretedlanguagethatrunsonenginesoftenwritteninC .1)JavaScriptwasdesignedasalightweight,interpretedlanguageforwebbrowsers.2)EnginesevolvedfromsimpleinterpreterstoJITcompilers,typicallyinC ,improvingperformance.

JavaScript can be used for front-end and back-end development. The front-end enhances the user experience through DOM operations, and the back-end handles server tasks through Node.js. 1. Front-end example: Change the content of the web page text. 2. Backend example: Create a Node.js server.

Choosing Python or JavaScript should be based on career development, learning curve and ecosystem: 1) Career development: Python is suitable for data science and back-end development, while JavaScript is suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 2) Learning curve: Python syntax is concise and suitable for beginners; JavaScript syntax is flexible. 3) Ecosystem: Python has rich scientific computing libraries, and JavaScript has a powerful front-end framework.


Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

SublimeText3 English version
Recommended: Win version, supports code prompts!

DVWA
Damn Vulnerable Web App (DVWA) is a PHP/MySQL web application that is very vulnerable. Its main goals are to be an aid for security professionals to test their skills and tools in a legal environment, to help web developers better understand the process of securing web applications, and to help teachers/students teach/learn in a classroom environment Web application security. The goal of DVWA is to practice some of the most common web vulnerabilities through a simple and straightforward interface, with varying degrees of difficulty. Please note that this software

Dreamweaver Mac version
Visual web development tools

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
